American Society of Transplant Surgeons Normothermic Regional Perfusion Standards: Ethical, Legal, and Operational Conformance.
Journal
Transplantation
ISSN: 1534-6080
Titre abrégé: Transplantation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0132144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jul 2024
17 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
16
7
2024
pubmed:
16
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The American Society of Transplant Surgeons convened a multidisciplinary working group to address operational, ethical, and legal considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) procurement. The working group, comprising members from American Society of Transplant Surgeons and AST across various disciplines including transplant surgery, hepatology, critical care, and bioethics, collaborated to formulate recommendations and guidance for NRP procurement. The following topics were identified by the group as essential standards that need to be addressed for ethical, legal, and operational conformance: terminology; conceptualization of death in the context of NRP; and communication, logistics, and training and competency. Fourteen recommendations that support the ethical and legal acceptability of NRP in the United States and set expectations for the conduct of NRP procedures are provided.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The American Society of Transplant Surgeons convened a multidisciplinary working group to address operational, ethical, and legal considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) procurement.
METHODS
METHODS
The working group, comprising members from American Society of Transplant Surgeons and AST across various disciplines including transplant surgery, hepatology, critical care, and bioethics, collaborated to formulate recommendations and guidance for NRP procurement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The following topics were identified by the group as essential standards that need to be addressed for ethical, legal, and operational conformance: terminology; conceptualization of death in the context of NRP; and communication, logistics, and training and competency.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Fourteen recommendations that support the ethical and legal acceptability of NRP in the United States and set expectations for the conduct of NRP procedures are provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39012935
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005115
pii: 00007890-990000000-00811
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.
Références
Wall AE, Adams BL, Brubaker A, et al. The American Society of Transplant Surgeons consensus statement on normothermic regional perfusion. Transplantation. 2024;108:312–318.
Wall AE, Fiedler A, Karp S, et al. Applying the ethical framework for donation after circulatory death to thoracic normothermic regional perfusion procedures. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:1311–1315.
Croome KP, Barbas AS, Whitson B, et al.; American Society of Transplant Surgeons Scientific Studies Committee. American Society of Transplant Surgeons recommendations on best practices in donation after circulatory death organ procurement. Am J Transplant. 2023;23:171–179.
Glazier AK, Capron AM. Normothermic regional perfusion and US legal standards for determining death are not aligned. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:1289–1290.
Parent B, Caplan A, Moazami N, et al. Regarding normothermic regional perfusion: arguing by insistence is not a strong argument. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:1729–1730.
Dhanani S, Hornby L, van Beinum A, et al.; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Resumption of cardiac activity after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:345–352.
Bernat JL, Dominguez-Gil B, Glazier AK, et al. Understanding the brain-based determination of death when organ recovery is performed with DCDD in situ normothermic regional perfusion. Transplantation. 2023;107:1650–1654.
Greer DM, Shemie SD, Lewis A, et al. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: the World Brain Death Project. JAMA. 2020;324:1078–1097.
Manara A, Shemie SD, Large S, et al. Maintaining the permanence principle for death during in situ normothermic regional perfusion for donation after circulatory death organ recovery: a United Kingdom and Canadian proposal. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:2017–2025.
Frontera JA, Lewis A, James L, et al. Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death does not restore brain blood flow. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023;42:1161–1165.
Royo-Villanova M, Minambres E, Sanchez JM, et al. Maintaining the permanence principle of death during normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: results of a prospective clinical study. Am J Transplant. 2024;24:213–221.
Langmuur SJJ, Amesz JH, Veen KM, et al. Normothermic ex situ heart perfusion with the organ care system for cardiac transplantation: a meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2022;106:1745–1753.
Hoffman JRH, Hartwig MG, Cain MT, et al. Consensus statement: technical standards for thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion. Transplantation. 2024;108:1669–1680.
Brubaker AL, Sellers MT, Abt PL, et al. US liver transplant outcomes after normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery. JAMA Surg. 2024:e240520.
Bekki Y, Croome KP, Myers B, et al. Normothermic regional perfusion can improve both utilization and outcomes in DCD liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Transplant Direct. 2023;9:e1450.
Ran G, Wall AE, Narang N, et al. Post-transplant survival after normothermic regional perfusion versus direct procurement and perfusion in donation after circulatory determination of death in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024;43:S158–S159.