Optimal Timing of Delivery for Pregnant Individuals With Mild Chronic Hypertension.


Journal

Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 23 03 2024
accepted: 04 06 2024
medline: 16 7 2024
pubmed: 16 7 2024
entrez: 16 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes. We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported. We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38). Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39013178
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005676
pii: 00006250-990000000-01113
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : 5U01HL1208336
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : 5R01HL1208336
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23159331
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Financial Disclosure: Torri D. Metz reports personal fees from Pfizer for her role as a medical consultant for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, and grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for RSV vaccination in pregnancy study outside the submitted work. Sherri Longo reports that UAB received NIH funding for the CHAP trial and Ochsner was one of the sites participating in the trial. Ochsner received a subaward from UAB for participation in the trial. Ochsner is a subsite to UAB, who is in the MFMU network; therefore, they have participated in trials. They have participated in other studies with UAB, including the CSOAP trial. They have collaborated on studies with Tulane and have subawards. Kelly Gibson reports money was paid to her institution from NHLBI, NICHD, and Materna Medical. Lauren Plante reports receiving payment from Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis for textbook royalties. She also received an honorarium speaking fee from Monmouth Medical Center. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie and Nemo Health. Heather Frey and Wendy Kinzler received payment from UpToDate. Todd Rosen's institution received payment from Materna, Inc. and Myriad, Inc. Mary Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment for a Johnson & Johnson clinical trial. He received payment from Prehevbrio for serving on the data safety monitoring board for hepatitis vaccine in pregnancy. Namasivayam Ambalavanan received payment from Oak Hill Bio and for serving on the advisory board and holding intellectual property with AlveolusBio and Resbiotic. Alan T. N. Tita's institution received payment from Pfizer. Everett Magann received payment from UpToDate for co-authorship of the Ultrasound Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Volume chapter. Lorraine Dugoff reports that money was paid to her institution from Myriad and Natera. Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving funding from UpToDate and Moderna. Eugene Chang reports money was paid to his institution from Roche Diagnostics and Roche. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Références

Ananth CV, Duzyj C, Yadava S, Schwebel M, Tita ATN, Joseph KS. Changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy, United States, 1970 to 2010; Hypertension 2019; 74: 1089–95. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968
Bruno AM, Allshouse AA, Metz TD, Theilen LH. Trends in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the United States from 1989 to 2020. Obstet Gynecol 2022;140:83–6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004824
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004824
Butwick AJ, Druzin ML, Shaw GM, Guo N. Evaluation of US state-level variation in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2018741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18741
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18741
Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018;379:513–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 831. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2021;138:e35–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004447
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004447
Cluver C, Novikova N, Koopmans CM, West HM. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD009273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2
Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, Dugoff L, Sibai B, Lawrence K, et al. Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1781–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201295
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201295
Ram M, Berger H, Geary M, McDonald SD, Murray-Davis B, Riddell C, et al. Timing of delivery in women with chronic hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:669–77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002800
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002800
Harper LM, Biggio JR, Anderson S, Tita ATN. Gestational age of delivery in pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:1101–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001435
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001435
Kirkham K, Tohill S, Hutcheon JA, Dorling J, Gkini E, Moakes CA, et al. WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial. Pregnancy Hypertens 2023;32:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.002

Auteurs

Torri D Metz (TD)

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, and University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, University of Pennsylvania and Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, and Magee Women's Hospital and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, and Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, Columbia University and Weill Cornell University, New York, and NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, Long Island, and NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, Flushing, New York, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, and University of South Alabama at Mobile, Mobile, Alabama, UnityPoint Health-Meriter Hospital/Marshfield Clinic, Madison, and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, The Ohio State University, Columbus, and Wright State University and Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, University of Colorado, Aurora, and Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Stanford University, Stanford, and Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, California, Beaumont Hospital, Michigan, Grosse Pointe, Michigan, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, and University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas; the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, and the Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; the Department of Biostatistics, the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, and the Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; St. Luke's University Health Network, Fountain Hill, and the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania; MetroHealth System, Cleveland, and the Fetal Care Center of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Intermountain Healthcare, Ogden, Utah; Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware; St. Peters University Hospital, New Brunswick, Virtua Health, Marlton, and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, New Jersey; Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California; the Department of Obstetrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Obstetrics and Gynecology/Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and the Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Classifications MeSH