Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults: An expert consensus statement using a Delphi method to produce a decision-making algorithm.

Biologic Delphi Guideline Psoriasis

Journal

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie
ISSN: 0151-9638
Titre abrégé: Ann Dermatol Venereol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 7702013

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 27 06 2023
accepted: 22 02 2024
medline: 17 7 2024
pubmed: 17 7 2024
entrez: 16 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review. A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal. Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors). This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
METHODS METHODS
The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal.
RESULTS RESULTS
Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39013256
pii: S0151-9638(24)00043-7
doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2024.103287
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103287

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

F Poizeau (F)

Univ Rennes, Rennes University Hospital, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France; Dermatology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France. Electronic address: florence.poizeau@chu-rennes.fr.

S Leducq (S)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; University of Tours, Nantes University, INSERM, SPHERE 1246, Tours, France; Dermatology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.

L Fardet (L)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Nogent-sur-Marne, France.

M Beylot-Barry (M)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Guillaume Chaby (G)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.

M Chastagner (M)

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

F Corgibet (F)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Dijon, France.

L Gouillon (L)

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

N Jouan (N)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Brest, France.

D Jullien (D)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

A Acher (A)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Caen, France.

F Amatore (F)

Dermatology, Nord University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

J-M Amici (JM)

Dermatology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

H Aubert (H)

Dermatology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

F Aubin (F)

Dermatology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.

N Beneton (N)

Dermatology, Le Mans Hospital, Le Mans, France.

D Bouilly (D)

Dermatology, Dijon, Dijon, France.

A-C Bursztejn (AC)

Dermatology, Nancy University Hospital, France.

C Buzenet (C)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Bayonne, France.

M Chamaillard-Pujol (M)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Bordeaux, France.

J Charles (J)

Dermatology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, La Tronche, France.

A-C Cottencin-Charriere (AC)

Dermatology, Private Practice, Lille, France.

B Duval Modeste (B)

Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

A Fauconneau (A)

Dermatology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France; Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Gradignan, France.

A-C Fougerousse (AC)

Dermatology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, Saint-Mandé, France; ResoPso, Paris, France.

C Girard (C)

Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.

C Goujon (C)

Dermatology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Lyon, France.

A Khemis (A)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Nice, France.

Y Le Ru (Y)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Brest, France.

C Lepelley-Dupont (C)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Vannes, France.

E Mahé (E)

Dermatology, Argenteuil Hospital, Argenteuil, France.

X Marcellin (X)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Villeurbanne, France.

C Nicolas (C)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Commercy, France.

V Pallure (V)

Dermatology, Perpignan Hospital, Perpignan, France.

J Parier (J)

Dermatology, Private Practitioner, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France.

N Quiles (N)

Dermatology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Marseille, France.

P-E Stoebner (PE)

Dermatology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.

M Tauber (M)

Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.

A Vermersch (A)

Dermatology, Calais Hospital, Calais, France.

M Viguier (M)

Dermatology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.

A P Villani (AP)

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

O Chosidow (O)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor APHP, Créteil, France.

B Guillot (B)

Centre of Evidence of The French Society of Dermatology, Paris, France; Dermatology, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Classifications MeSH