Different judgment frameworks for moral compliance and moral violation.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
22
01
2024
accepted:
04
07
2024
medline:
17
7
2024
pubmed:
17
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent decades, the field of moral psychology has focused on moral judgments based on some moral foundations/categories (e.g., harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity). When discussing the moral categories, however, whether a person judges moral compliance or moral violation has been rarely considered. We examined the extent to which moral judgments are influenced by each other across moral categories and explored whether the framework of judgments for moral violation and compliance would be different. For this purpose, we developed the episodes set for moral and affective behaviors. For each episode, participants evaluated valence, arousal, morality, and the degree of relevance to each of the Haidt's 5 moral foundations. The cluster analysis showed that the moral compliance episodes were divided into three clusters, whereas the moral violation episodes were divided into two clusters. Also, the additional experiment indicated that the clusters might not be stable in time. These findings suggest that people have different framework of judgments for moral compliance and moral violation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39014035
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66862-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-66862-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16432Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP20J00838
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 22H00090
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Mikhail, J. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
pubmed: 17329147
Carchidi, V. J. The nature of morals: How universal moral grammar provides the conceptual basis for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Hum. Rights Rev. 21(1), 65–92 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s12142-019-00576-8
Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures (Mouton, 1957).
doi: 10.1515/9783112316009
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. How moral foundations theory succeeded in building on sand: A response to Suhler and Churchland. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(9), 2117–2122 (2011).
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21638
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In The Innate Mind Vol. 3 (eds Carruthers, P. et al.) 367–391 (Oxford, 2007).
Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108(4), 814–834 (2001).
pubmed: 11699120
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 133(4), 55–66 (2004).
doi: 10.1162/0011526042365555
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P. & Haidt, J. Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE 7(8), e42366 (2012).
pubmed: 22927928
pmcid: 3424229
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
Atari, M. & Haidt, J. Ownership is (likely to be) a moral foundation. Behav. Brain Sci. 46, e326 (2023).
pubmed: 37813408
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2300119X
Atari, M. et al. Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 125(5), 1157–1188 (2023).
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000470
Atari, M. Culture of honor. In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (eds Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K.) 977–980 (Springer, 2020).
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_650
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A. & Whitehouse, H. Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Curr. Anthropol. 60(1), 47–69 (2019).
doi: 10.1086/701478
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M. & Park, L. The ‘“big three”’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the ‘“big three”’ explanations of suffering. In Morality and Health (eds Rozin, P. & Brandt, A.) (Routledge, 1997).
Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F. & Baron, J. Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moral–conventional distinction. Cognition 112(1), 159–174 (2009).
pubmed: 19439283
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.004
Sousa, P., Holbrook, C. & Piazza, J. The morality of harm. Cognition 113(1), 80–92 (2009).
pubmed: 19717146
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.015
Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In The Innate Mind. Foundations and the future Vol. 3 (eds Carruthers, P. et al.) 367–391 (Oxford University Press, 2008).
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195332827.003.0019
Mitchell, P. R. & Schoeffel, J. Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky (The New Press, 2002).
Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behav. Res. Methods 47(4), 1178–1198 (2015).
pubmed: 25582811
pmcid: 4780680
doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 96(5), 1029–1046 (2009).
doi: 10.1037/a0015141
Matsuo, A., Sasahara, K., Taguchi, Y. & Karasawa, M. Development and validation of the Japanese moral foundations dictionary. PLoS ONE 14(3), e0213343 (2019).
pubmed: 30908489
pmcid: 6433225
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213343
Crone, D. L., Bode, S., Murawski, C. & Laham, S. M. The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes. PLoS ONE 13(1), e0190954 (2018).
pubmed: 29364985
pmcid: 5783374
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190954
McCurrie, C. H., Crone, D. L., Bigelow, F. & Laham, S. M. Moral and Affective Film Set (MAAFS): A normed moral video database. PLoS ONE 13(11), e0206604 (2018).
pubmed: 30427897
pmcid: 6235297
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206604
Haidt, J. & Graham, J. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc. Justice Res. 20(1), 98–116 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Pettit, J. W., Kline, J. P., Gencoz, T., Gencoz, F. & Joiner, T. E. Jr. Are happy people healthier? The specific role of positive affect in predicting self-reported health symptoms. J. Res. Personal. 35(4), 521–536 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2001.2327
Orita, R. & Hattori, M. Positive and negative affects facilitate insight problem-solving in different ways: A study with implicit hints. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 61(2), 94–106 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/jpr.12237
Van Yperen, N. W. On the link between different combinations of Negative Affectivity (NA) and Positive Affectivity (PA) and job performance. Personal. Individ. Differ. 35(8), 1873–1881 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00036-9
Cunningham, M. R., Steinberg, J. & Grev, R. Wanting to and having to help: Separate motivations for positive mood and guilt-induced helping. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 38(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.181 (1980).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.181
Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H., Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. The visual impact of gossip. Science 332(6036), 1446–1448 (2011).
pubmed: 21596956
pmcid: 3141574
doi: 10.1126/science.1201574
Konishi, N., Oe, T., Shimizu, H., Tanaka, K. & Ohtsubo, Y. Perceived shared condemnation intensifies punitive moral emotions. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 7289 (2017).
pubmed: 28779134
pmcid: 5544740
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07916-z
Shirai, R. & Ogawa, H. Morality extracted under crowding impairs face identification. i-Perception https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695221104843 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/20416695221104843
pubmed: 35782829
pmcid: 9243483
JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.18.3) [Computer software] (2024).
Kurdi, B., Lozano, S. & Banaji, M. R. Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behav. Res. Methods 49(2), 457–470 (2017).
pubmed: 26907748
doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A. & Barrett, L. F. The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychol. Bull. 139(4), 917 (2013).
pubmed: 23231533
doi: 10.1037/a0030811
Lang, P. J. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. Am. Psychol. 50(5), 372 (1995).
pubmed: 7762889
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.372
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V. & Niknafs, A. NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. J. Stat. Softw. 61(6), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06 (2014).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v061.i06
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2023). http://www.R-project.org/ .
Friesen, A. Generational change? The effects of family, age, and time on moral foundations. The Forum 17(1), 121–140 (2019).
doi: 10.1515/for-2019-0005
Sağel, E. Age Differences in Moral Foundations Across Adolescence and Adulthood. Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University (2015).
Graham, J. et al. Mapping the moral domain. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 101(2), 366–385 (2011).
doi: 10.1037/a0021847
Atari, M., Lai, M. H. C. & Dehghani, M. Sex differences in moral judgments across 67 countries. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1201 (2020).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201
Turiel, E. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Kawamura, K. Y. Body image among Asian Americans. In Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance (ed. Cash, T. F.) 95–102 (Academic Press, 2012).
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384925-0.00039-0
Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. Janet Taylor Spence: Innovator in the study of gender. Sex Roles 77(11), 725–733 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0835-y
Niazi, F., Inam, A. & Akhtar, Z. Accuracy of consensual stereotypes in moral foundations: A gender analysis. PLoS ONE 15(3), e0229926 (2020).
pubmed: 32135546
pmcid: 7058411
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229926
Dymond, S., Dunsmoor, J. E., Vervliet, B., Roche, B. & Hermans, D. Fear generalization in humans: Systematic review and implications for anxiety disorder research. Behav. Ther. 46(5), 561–582 (2015).
pubmed: 26459838
doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.10.001
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G. & Hatemi, P. K. Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. Am. J. Political Sci. 61(2), 424–437 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/ajps.12255
Brown, M., Chua, K. J. & Lukaszewski, A. W. Formidability and socioeconomic status uniquely predict militancy and political moral foundations. Personal. Individ. Differ. 168, 110284 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110284
O’Hara, R. E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & Sinnott-Armstrong, N. A. Wording effects in moral judgments. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5(7), 547–554 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S1930297500001716
Barbosa, S. & Jiménez-Leal, W. It’s not right but it’s permitted: Wording effects in moral judgement. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 12(3), 308–313 (2017).
doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005908
Petrinovich, L. & O’Neill, P. Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethol. Sociobiol. 17(3), 145–171 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6
Blankenship, K. L., Craig, T. Y. & Machacek, M. G. The interplay between absolute language and moral reasoning on endorsement of moral foundations. Front. Psychol. 12, 569380 (2021).
pubmed: 33995164
pmcid: 8119991
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569380