Noncomplex ventricular arrhythmia associated with greater freedom from recurrent ectopy at 1 year after mitral repair surgery.

arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse complex ventricular degenerative mitral valve disease malignant mitral prolapse mitral regurgitation mitral repair outcomes recurrent ventricular arrhythmia sudden cardiac death surgical mitral repair ventricular ectopy

Journal

JTCVS open
ISSN: 2666-2736
Titre abrégé: JTCVS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101768541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 07 06 2023
revised: 10 03 2024
accepted: 01 04 2024
medline: 17 7 2024
pubmed: 17 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The effect of mitral valve (MV) surgery on the natural history of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in patients with arrhythmic MV prolapse remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the cumulative incidence of VA at 1 year after surgical mitral repair. A retrospective review of progressively captured data identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent elective MV repair for significant degenerative mitral regurgitation as a first-time cardiovascular intervention in a quaternary reference center between January 2018 and December 2020. A subset of 62 consecutive patients with diagnosed arrhythmic MV prolapse was further evaluated for recurrent VA after MV repair. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years) and 26 of 62 (41.9%) were female. The median time from initial mitral regurgitation/MV prolaspe diagnosis-to-referral was 13.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.4-25) and from VA diagnosis-to-referral was 8 years (IQR, 3-10.6). Using the Lown-Wolf classification, complex VA (Lown grade ≥3) was identified in 36 of 62 patients (58%) at baseline, whereas 8 of 62 (13%) had a cardioverter/defibrillator implanted for primary (4/8) or secondary (4/8) prevention. Left ventricular myocardial scar was confirmed in 23 of 34 (68%) of patients scanned at baseline. The prevailing valve phenotype was bileaflet Barlow (59/62; 95.2%). All patients underwent surgical MV repair by the same team. Surgical repair was stabilized with an annuloplasty prosthesis (median size 36 mm [IQR, 34-38]). Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve repair (51/62; 82.3%), cryo-maze ± left atrial appendage exclusion (14/62, 23%), and endocardial cryoablation of VA ectopy (4/62; 6.5%). The 30-day and 1-year freedom from recurrent VA were 98.4% and 75.9%, respectively. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA at baseline. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA preoperatively. Complex baseline VA was the strongest predictor of recurrent VA (hazard ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-84.2; In a series of 62 consecutive patients operated electively for arrhythmic mitral prolapse, VA remained undetected in 75.9% of patients at 1 year. Freedom from recurrent VA was greater among patients without complex VA preoperatively, whereas baseline Lown grade ≥3 was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrent VA at 1 year. These findings attest to the importance of early recognition and prompt referral of patients with mitral prolapse and progressive VA to specialty interdisciplinary care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39015439
doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.005
pii: S2666-2736(24)00107-4
pmc: PMC11247206
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

94-113

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

D.P. received nonfinancial support from TOMTEC Imaging Systems GmbH (PI - research license for myocardial strain analysis software). M.M. has served as a consultant to Boston Scientific. D.A. is the National co-Principal Investigator for the Triluminate-II US Pivotal Trials, the Medtronic Apollo and CoreValve US Pivotal Trials, and ReChord US Pivotal Trial, respectively. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai receives royalty payments from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic for intellectual property related to D.A.’s involvement in the development of 3 mitral valve repair rings and a tricuspid valve repair ring. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Dimosthenis Pandis (D)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Navindra David (N)

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Ahmed Ei-Eshmawi (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Marc A Miller (MA)

Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.

Percy Boateng (P)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Ana Claudia Costa (AC)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Philip Robson (P)

The BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Maria Giovanna Trivieri (MG)

The BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Zahi Fayad (Z)

The BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Anelechi C Anyanwu (AC)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

David H Adams (DH)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Classifications MeSH