Understanding homologous recombination repair deficiency in biliary tract cancers: clinical implications and correlation with platinum sensitivity.

BRCAness DNA damage repair biliary tract cancer homologous recombination repair (HRR) precision oncology

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 01 04 2024
revised: 28 05 2024
accepted: 29 05 2024
medline: 17 7 2024
pubmed: 17 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) exhibit high mortality rates and significant heterogeneity in both clinical and molecular characteristics. This study aims to molecularly characterize a cohort of patients with BTC, with a specific focus on genomic alterations within homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in a real-world setting. We carried out a retrospective analysis on 256 patients with BTC treated at five Austrian centers and one German comprehensive cancer center between 2016 and 2023 utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling platforms to assess HRR status and its correlation with clinical outcomes after platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 67 patients (27.5%) exhibited HRR gene mutations (HRRm), with the most common pathogenic alterations in BAP1 (9%), ARID1A (7.8%), and ATM (6.1%). Time to failure of the first-line strategy (TFS) between patients with HRRm and non-HRRm treated with platinum agents was 7.9 and 6.7 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89; P = 0.49]. The overall survival (OS) estimates at 6, 18, and 24 months were 82%, 45%, and 39% in the HRRm group (median 16.01 months) and 81%, 42%, and 22% in the HRR group (median 15.68 months), respectively (Fleming-Harrington test P = 0.0004; log-rank P = 0.022). Significance did not persist in the multivariate analysis (HR 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.489-1.059; P = 0.095). An interaction between HRRm status and molecular-informed therapeutic strategies in later lines was noted. In the second-line treatment, OS following an irinotecan-based regimen was comparable to re-exposure to platinum-based agents (12.36 versus 10.13 months; HR 0.92; P = 0.85). No better outcome was noted for patients with HRRm versus patients with non-HRRm with second-line platinum agents (HR 1.45; P = 0.35). Patients with HRRm with BTC showed a potential advantage in OS following platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, presumably attributed to enhanced opportunities for targetable coalterations. Further investigation is needed to outline HRR within the scope of BTCs and detail a clinically meaningful sensitivity to platinum agents or targeted approaches with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) exhibit high mortality rates and significant heterogeneity in both clinical and molecular characteristics. This study aims to molecularly characterize a cohort of patients with BTC, with a specific focus on genomic alterations within homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in a real-world setting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
We carried out a retrospective analysis on 256 patients with BTC treated at five Austrian centers and one German comprehensive cancer center between 2016 and 2023 utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling platforms to assess HRR status and its correlation with clinical outcomes after platinum-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 67 patients (27.5%) exhibited HRR gene mutations (HRRm), with the most common pathogenic alterations in BAP1 (9%), ARID1A (7.8%), and ATM (6.1%). Time to failure of the first-line strategy (TFS) between patients with HRRm and non-HRRm treated with platinum agents was 7.9 and 6.7 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89; P = 0.49]. The overall survival (OS) estimates at 6, 18, and 24 months were 82%, 45%, and 39% in the HRRm group (median 16.01 months) and 81%, 42%, and 22% in the HRR group (median 15.68 months), respectively (Fleming-Harrington test P = 0.0004; log-rank P = 0.022). Significance did not persist in the multivariate analysis (HR 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.489-1.059; P = 0.095). An interaction between HRRm status and molecular-informed therapeutic strategies in later lines was noted. In the second-line treatment, OS following an irinotecan-based regimen was comparable to re-exposure to platinum-based agents (12.36 versus 10.13 months; HR 0.92; P = 0.85). No better outcome was noted for patients with HRRm versus patients with non-HRRm with second-line platinum agents (HR 1.45; P = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Patients with HRRm with BTC showed a potential advantage in OS following platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, presumably attributed to enhanced opportunities for targetable coalterations. Further investigation is needed to outline HRR within the scope of BTCs and detail a clinically meaningful sensitivity to platinum agents or targeted approaches with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39018588
pii: S2059-7029(24)01399-1
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103630
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103630

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

I-A Mavroeidi (IA)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

J Burghofer (J)

Laboratory for Molecular Genetic Diagnostics, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.

S Kalbourtzis (S)

Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

H Taghizadeh (H)

Department of Internal Medicine, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, St. Pölten.

G Webersinke (G)

Laboratory for Molecular Genetic Diagnostics, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.

G Piringer (G)

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz; Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz.

S Kasper (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen.

G Schreil (G)

Department of Internal Medicine, State Hospital Pyhrn Eisenwurzen, Steyr.

S T Liffers (ST)

Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

A Reichinger (A)

Department of Internal Medicine I for Hematology with Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology, and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz.

P Kirchweger (P)

Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz; Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz; Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz.

S Heibl (S)

Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.

R Hamacher (R)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen.

C A Schmitt (CA)

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz; Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz.

M Schuler (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Campus Essen, Essen, Germany.

G W Prager (GW)

Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

D Kersting (D)

Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen.

J Treckmann (J)

Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen.

H-U Schildhaus (HU)

Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Discovery Life Sciences Biomarker GmbH und Pathologie Nordhessen, Kassel, Germany.

H Rumpold (H)

Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz; Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz.

J T Siveke (JT)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: jens.siveke@uk-essen.de.

B Doleschal (B)

Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz; Department of Internal Medicine I for Hematology with Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology, and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz. Electronic address: bernhard.doleschal@ordensklinikum.at.

Classifications MeSH