Potential of non-contrast spiral breast CT to exploit lesion density and favor breast cancer detection: A pilot study.

Breast CT Breast density Breast neoplasm Malignant breast lesion

Journal

European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 11 02 2024
revised: 30 06 2024
accepted: 10 07 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the density values of breast lesions and breast tissue using non-contrast spiral breast CT (nc-SBCT) imaging. In this prospective study women undergoing nc-SBCT between April-October 2023 for any purpose were included in case of: histologically proven malignant lesion (ML); fibroadenoma (FA) with histologic confirmation or stability > 24 months (retrospectively); cysts with ultrasound correlation; and women with extremely dense breast (EDB) and no sonographic findings. Three regions of interest were placed on each lesion and 3 different area of EDB. The evaluation was performed by two readers (R1 and R2). Kruskal-Wallis test, intraclass correlation (ICC) and ROC analysis were used. 40 women with 12 ML, 10 FA, 15 cysts and 9 with EDB were included. Median density values and interquartile ranges for R1 and R2 were: 60.2 (53.3-67.3) and 62.5 (55.67-76.3) HU for ML; 46.3 (41.9-59.5) and 44.5 (40.5-59.8) HU for FA; 35.3 (24.3-46.0) and 39.7 (26.7-52.0) HU for cysts; and 28.7 (24.2-33.0) and 33.3 (31.7-36.8) HU for EDB. For both readers, densities were significantly different for ML versus EDB (p < 0.001) and cysts (p < 0.001) and for FA versus EDB (p=/<0.003). The AUC was 0.925 (95 %CI 0.858-0.993) for R1 and 0.942 (0.884-1.00) for R2 when comparing ML versus others and 0.792 (0.596-0.987) and 0.833 (0.659-1) when comparing ML versus FA. The ICC showed an almost perfect inter-reader (0.978) and intra-reader agreement (>0.879 for both readers). In nc-SBCT malignant lesions have higher density values compared to normal tissue and measurements of density values are reproducible between different readers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39018650
pii: S0720-048X(24)00330-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111614
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111614

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Julia Weber (J)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Giulia Zanetti (G)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Elizabet Nikolova (E)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Thomas Frauenfelder (T)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Andreas Boss (A)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; GZO AG Spital Wetzikon, Spitalstrasse 66, Wetzikon 8620, Switzerland.

Jann Wieler (J)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Magda Marcon (M)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Radiology, Spital Lachen, Oberdorfstrasse 41, Lachen 8853, Switzerland. Electronic address: magda.marcon@usz.ch.

Classifications MeSH