Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With New-Generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors.

Abiraterone acetate Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor Apalutamide Enzalutamide Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 05 04 2024
revised: 13 05 2024
accepted: 12 06 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC. We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC. Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005). We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC.
RESULTS RESULTS
Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39018723
pii: S1558-7673(24)00111-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102140
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102140

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Auteurs

Kotaro Suzuki (K)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. Electronic address: pikataro1012@gmail.com.

Yusuke Shiraishi (Y)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Junya Furukawa (J)

Department of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.

Yasuyoshi Okamura (Y)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Yukari Bando (Y)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Takuto Hara (T)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Keisuke Okada (K)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Tomoaki Terakawa (T)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Yoji Hyodo (Y)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Koji Chiba (K)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Jun Teishima (J)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Yuzo Nakano (Y)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Hideaki Miyake (H)

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Classifications MeSH