Endocannabinoid analysis in GlucoEXACT plasma: Method validation and sample handling recommendations.

Endocannabinoids GlucoEXACT plasma sampling Inflammatory skin disease Method validation Pre-analytical sample handling UHPLC-MS/MS

Journal

Talanta
ISSN: 1873-3573
Titre abrégé: Talanta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 2984816R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 26 03 2024
revised: 02 07 2024
accepted: 04 07 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Endocannabinoids (ECs), such as anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), contribute to the pathology of inflammatory, malignant, cardiovascular, metabolic and mental diseases. The reliability of quantitative analyses in biological fluids of ECs and endocannabinoid-like (EC-like) substances depends on pre-analytical conditions such as temperature and "time-to-centrifugation". Standardization of these parameters is critical for valid quantification and implementation in clinical research. In this study, we compared concentrations obtained with GlucoEXACT blood collection tubes versus K3EDTA tubes and employed the optimized procedure to assess ECs profiles in patients with inflammatory skin disease and healthy controls. A UHPLC-MS/MS method was validated for human plasma from GlucoEXACT blood collection tubes according to EMA and FDA guidelines, and pre-analytical conditions were systematically modified to assess analyte stability and optimize the procedures. The results showed significantly lower concentrations of ECs and EC-like substance concentrations with GlucoEXACT tubes compared with K3EDTA tubes, and GlucoEXACT extended the time window of stable concentrations. The strongest method-disagreement occurred for 1/2-AG suggesting that GlucoEXACT delayed ex vivo isomer rearrangement. Hence, GlucoExact tubes were superior in terms of stability and reliability. However, although absolute concentrations obtained with GlucoExact and K3EDTA differed, linear regression studies showed high agreement (except for 1/2-AG), and both methods showed similar EC profiles and similar disease-dependent pro-inflammatory patterns in dermatology patients. Hence, despite the obstacles in EC analyses, implementation of optimized pre-analytical blood collection and sample processing procedures provide reliable insight into peripheral ECs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39018759
pii: S0039-9140(24)00897-X
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126518
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126518

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

A Sens (A)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

D Thomas (D)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

S M G Schäfer (SMG)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

A König (A)

Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

A Pinter (A)

Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

I Tegeder (I)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

G Geisslinger (G)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

R Gurke (R)

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Electronic address: gurke@med.uni-frankfurt.de.

Classifications MeSH