Lateral Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Acupuncture for Postcaesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Acupuncture Acute pain Caesarean section Quadratus lumborum block

Journal

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
ISSN: 2589-9333
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 15 03 2024
revised: 27 06 2024
accepted: 04 07 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Improved pain control after caesarean section remains a challenging objective. Although both the lateral quadratus lumborum block and acupuncture have been reported to provide superior postoperative analgesia after caesarean section when compared to placebo, the efficacy of these techniques has never been compared head-to-head. This study was conducted to investigate the comparative analgesic efficacy of lateral quadratus lumborum block and acupuncture following elective caesarean section. In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 190 patients with singleton term pregnancies scheduled for caesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to acupuncture group or lateral quadratus lumborum block group. Lateral quadratus lumborum block group received bilateral lateral quadratus lumborum block with 0.33% ropivacaine and sham acupuncture, acupuncture group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy and sham lateral quadratus lumborum block. All patients received the standard postoperative pain treatment. The primary outcome was pain scores on movement at 24 h. Secondary endpoints included pain scores in the first 48 h postoperatively, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia demands, analgesia-related adverse effects, postoperative complications, QoR-15, the time to mobilization, and gastrointestinal function. Median (IQR [range]) pain scores at 24 h on movement was similar in patients receiving acupuncture or lateral quadratus lumborum block (3 (2-4) vs. 3 (2-4), respectively; P = 0.40). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia consumption and pain scores within 48 h postoperatively also showed no difference between the two groups. The acupuncture improved QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.001), as well as shortened the time to first flatus (P=0.03) and first drinking (P<0.001) compared to lateral quadratus lumborum block. In addition, the median time to mobilization in the lateral quadratus lumborum block group was markedly prolonged compare with acupuncture group (17.0 (15.0-19.0) h vs. 15.3 (13.3-17.0) h, estimated median difference, 1.5; 95%CI, 1-2; P<0.001;). As a component of multimodal analgesia regimen after caesarean section, acupuncture did not lower postoperative pain scores or reduce analgesic medication consumption compared to lateral quadratus lumborum block.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Improved pain control after caesarean section remains a challenging objective. Although both the lateral quadratus lumborum block and acupuncture have been reported to provide superior postoperative analgesia after caesarean section when compared to placebo, the efficacy of these techniques has never been compared head-to-head.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to investigate the comparative analgesic efficacy of lateral quadratus lumborum block and acupuncture following elective caesarean section.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 190 patients with singleton term pregnancies scheduled for caesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to acupuncture group or lateral quadratus lumborum block group. Lateral quadratus lumborum block group received bilateral lateral quadratus lumborum block with 0.33% ropivacaine and sham acupuncture, acupuncture group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy and sham lateral quadratus lumborum block. All patients received the standard postoperative pain treatment. The primary outcome was pain scores on movement at 24 h. Secondary endpoints included pain scores in the first 48 h postoperatively, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia demands, analgesia-related adverse effects, postoperative complications, QoR-15, the time to mobilization, and gastrointestinal function.
RESULTS RESULTS
Median (IQR [range]) pain scores at 24 h on movement was similar in patients receiving acupuncture or lateral quadratus lumborum block (3 (2-4) vs. 3 (2-4), respectively; P = 0.40). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia consumption and pain scores within 48 h postoperatively also showed no difference between the two groups. The acupuncture improved QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.001), as well as shortened the time to first flatus (P=0.03) and first drinking (P<0.001) compared to lateral quadratus lumborum block. In addition, the median time to mobilization in the lateral quadratus lumborum block group was markedly prolonged compare with acupuncture group (17.0 (15.0-19.0) h vs. 15.3 (13.3-17.0) h, estimated median difference, 1.5; 95%CI, 1-2; P<0.001;).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
As a component of multimodal analgesia regimen after caesarean section, acupuncture did not lower postoperative pain scores or reduce analgesic medication consumption compared to lateral quadratus lumborum block.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39019211
pii: S2589-9333(24)00159-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101433
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101433

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Auteurs

Pei-Pei Qin (PP)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Bing-Yu Zou (BY)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Dan Liu (D)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Ming-Xi Li (MX)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Xiao-Nan Liu (XN)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Ke Wei (K)

The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: 418228652@qq.com.

Classifications MeSH