Monocentric retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, complications, and adjacent segment disease in 507 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

ACDF Adjacent Segment Disease Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Elderly Spine Surgery

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 23 02 2024
revised: 08 07 2024
accepted: 09 07 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Surgery aims to arrest neurological decline and improve conditions, but controversies surround risks and benefits in elderly patients, outcomes in mild myelopathy, and the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Retrospective data of patients who underwent ACDF for DCM in our hospital were collected. Patients were stratified by preoperative mJOA (mild, moderate, severe) and age (Under 70, Over 70). Clinical outcomes, complications, and ASD rate were analyzed. We evaluated the relationship between mJOA recovery rate and the risk of complications and various preoperative parameters. 507 consecutive patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 43.52 months (12-71). Improvement in all outcome variables was observed in mild, moderate and severe myelopathy categories, with elderly patients showing a lower improvement. Except for age, no other variable correlated with mJOA recovery rate. We observed 45 complications (11.1% of patients), with 14 in the U70 group and 31 in the O70 group (p-value<0.001). Age, Charlson Comorbidity index and ASA score were found to be predictors of complications. Fourteen patients (2.8% of total), mean age 54.2, developed radiological and clinical ASD. Most had cranial-level ASD with Pfirmann grade >= 2 before index surgery. Most myelopathic patients improve after ACDF. Elderly patients show a lower improvement and higher complication rates than younger counterparts. ASD rates are low, and younger patients with preexisting cranial level alterations are more susceptible.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Surgery aims to arrest neurological decline and improve conditions, but controversies surround risks and benefits in elderly patients, outcomes in mild myelopathy, and the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD).
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective data of patients who underwent ACDF for DCM in our hospital were collected. Patients were stratified by preoperative mJOA (mild, moderate, severe) and age (Under 70, Over 70). Clinical outcomes, complications, and ASD rate were analyzed. We evaluated the relationship between mJOA recovery rate and the risk of complications and various preoperative parameters.
RESULTS RESULTS
507 consecutive patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 43.52 months (12-71). Improvement in all outcome variables was observed in mild, moderate and severe myelopathy categories, with elderly patients showing a lower improvement. Except for age, no other variable correlated with mJOA recovery rate. We observed 45 complications (11.1% of patients), with 14 in the U70 group and 31 in the O70 group (p-value<0.001). Age, Charlson Comorbidity index and ASA score were found to be predictors of complications. Fourteen patients (2.8% of total), mean age 54.2, developed radiological and clinical ASD. Most had cranial-level ASD with Pfirmann grade >= 2 before index surgery.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Most myelopathic patients improve after ACDF. Elderly patients show a lower improvement and higher complication rates than younger counterparts. ASD rates are low, and younger patients with preexisting cranial level alterations are more susceptible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39019433
pii: S1878-8750(24)01219-1
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.079
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ali Baram (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Gabriele Capo (G)

Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Marco Riva (M)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Carlo Brembilla (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Elena Rosellini (E)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Mario De Robertis (M)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Franco Servadei (F)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Federico Pessina (F)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Maurizio Fornari (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital -, via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH