Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine on patient-centred outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

adult anaesthesia chronic postsurgical pain clinical pharmacology dexmedetomidine opioid minimisation strategies pain management patient-centred outcomes

Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 03 04 2024
revised: 23 05 2024
accepted: 13 06 2024
medline: 18 7 2024
pubmed: 18 7 2024
entrez: 17 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Dexmedetomidine is increasingly used for surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia. However, its effectiveness on patient-centred outcomes remains uncertain. Our main objective was to evaluate the patient-centred effectiveness of intraoperative dexmedetomidine for adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine with placebo, opioid, or usual care in adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. We synthesised data using a random-effects Bayesian regression framework to derive effect estimates and the probability of a clinically important effect. For continuous outcomes, we pooled instruments with similar constructs using standardised mean differences (SMDs) and converted SMDs and credible intervals (CrIs) to their original scale when appropriate. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Our primary outcome was quality of recovery after surgery. To guide interpretation on the original scale, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) instrument was used (range 0-150 points, minimally important difference [MID] of 6 points). We identified 49,069 citations, from which 44 RCTs involving 5904 participants were eligible. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration was associated with improvement in postoperative QoR-15 (mean difference 9, 95% CrI 4-14, n=21 RCTs, moderate certainty of evidence). We found 99% probability of any benefit and 88% probability of achieving the MID. There was a reduction in chronic pain incidence (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% CrI 0.19-0.79, n=7 RCTs, low certainty of evidence). There was also increased risk of clinically significant hypotension (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 0.84-3.92, posterior probability of harm 94%, n=8 RCTs) and clinically significant bradycardia (OR 1.74, 95% CrI 0.93-3.34, posterior probability of harm 95%, n=10 RCTs), with very low certainty of evidence for both. There was limited evidence to inform other secondary patient-centred outcomes. Compared with placebo or standard of care, intraoperative dexmedetomidine likely results in meaningful improvement in the quality of recovery and chronic pain after surgery. However, it might increase clinically important bradycardia and hypotension. PROSPERO (CRD42023439896).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine is increasingly used for surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia. However, its effectiveness on patient-centred outcomes remains uncertain. Our main objective was to evaluate the patient-centred effectiveness of intraoperative dexmedetomidine for adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine with placebo, opioid, or usual care in adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. We synthesised data using a random-effects Bayesian regression framework to derive effect estimates and the probability of a clinically important effect. For continuous outcomes, we pooled instruments with similar constructs using standardised mean differences (SMDs) and converted SMDs and credible intervals (CrIs) to their original scale when appropriate. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Our primary outcome was quality of recovery after surgery. To guide interpretation on the original scale, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) instrument was used (range 0-150 points, minimally important difference [MID] of 6 points).
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 49,069 citations, from which 44 RCTs involving 5904 participants were eligible. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration was associated with improvement in postoperative QoR-15 (mean difference 9, 95% CrI 4-14, n=21 RCTs, moderate certainty of evidence). We found 99% probability of any benefit and 88% probability of achieving the MID. There was a reduction in chronic pain incidence (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% CrI 0.19-0.79, n=7 RCTs, low certainty of evidence). There was also increased risk of clinically significant hypotension (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 0.84-3.92, posterior probability of harm 94%, n=8 RCTs) and clinically significant bradycardia (OR 1.74, 95% CrI 0.93-3.34, posterior probability of harm 95%, n=10 RCTs), with very low certainty of evidence for both. There was limited evidence to inform other secondary patient-centred outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Compared with placebo or standard of care, intraoperative dexmedetomidine likely results in meaningful improvement in the quality of recovery and chronic pain after surgery. However, it might increase clinically important bradycardia and hypotension.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL UNASSIGNED
PROSPERO (CRD42023439896).

Identifiants

pubmed: 39019769
pii: S0007-0912(24)00346-5
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Michael Verret (M)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada; Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Quebec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Electronic address: Michael.verret.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.

John B P Le (JBP)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Manoj M Lalu (MM)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Matthew S Jeffers (MS)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Daniel I McIsaac (DI)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Stuart G Nicholls (SG)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Alexis F Turgeon (AF)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada; Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Rashi Ramchandani (R)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Hongda Li (H)

MDCM, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Brian Hutton (B)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Fiona Zivkovic (F)

Patient Partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ONT, Canada.

Megan Graham (M)

Patient Partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ONT, Canada.

Maxime Lê (M)

Patient Partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ONT, Canada.

Allison Geist (A)

Patient Partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ONT, Canada.

Mélanie Bérubé (M)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada; Quebec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Katie O'Hearn (K)

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ian Gilron (I)

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ONT, Canada.

Patricia Poulin (P)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Pain Clinic, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Helena Daudt (H)

Pain Canada, Pain BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Guillaume Martel (G)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Jason McVicar (J)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Royal Inland Hospital, Kamloops, BC, Canada.

Husein Moloo (H)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Dean A Fergusson (DA)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH