The enduring world forest carbon sink.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
22
05
2023
accepted:
24
05
2024
medline:
18
7
2024
pubmed:
18
7
2024
entrez:
17
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The uptake of carbon dioxide (CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 39020035
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Fossil Fuels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
563-569Informations de copyright
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
IPCC Working Group II. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Pörtner, H. O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023),
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 1917–2005 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
Peng, L., Searchinger, T. D., Zionts, J. & Waite, R. The carbon costs of global wood harvests Nature 620, 110–115 (2023).
pubmed: 37407827
pmcid: 10396961
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06187-1
NOAA. Monthly Average Mauna Loa CO
Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
McKay, D. I. A. et al. Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points Science 377, eabn7950 (2022).
doi: 10.1126/science.abn7950
United Nations/Framework Convention on Climate Change. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (United Nations, 2015).
Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f
IPCC Working Group I. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Walker, W. S. et al. The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2111312119 (2022).
pubmed: 35639697
pmcid: 9191349
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111312119
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).
pubmed: 21764754
doi: 10.1126/science.1201609
Araza, A. et al. Past decade above-ground biomass change comparisons from four multi-temporal global maps. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 118, 103274 (2023).
Suarez, D. R. et al. Estimating aboveground net biomass change for tropical and subtropical forests: refinement of IPCC default rates using forest plot data. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 3609–3624 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14767
IPCC. Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_full_report.pdf (1992).
Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO
pubmed: 25548156
pmcid: 4299228
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407302112
Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).
doi: 10.5194/bg-12-653-2015
Pan, Y. et al. Contrasting responses of woody and grassland ecosystems to increased CO
pubmed: 35027723
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01642-6
Walker, A. P. et al. Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO
pubmed: 32789857
doi: 10.1111/nph.16866
Shvetsov, E. G., Kukavskaya, E. A., Shestakova, T. A., Laflamme, J. & Rogers, B. M. Increasing fire and logging disturbances in Siberian boreal forests: a case study of the Angara region. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 115007 (2021).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2e37
Fan, L. et al. Siberian carbon sink reduced by forest disturbances. Nat. Geosci. 16, 56–62 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41561-022-01087-x
Wang, J. A., Baccini, A., Farina, M., Randerson, J. T. & Friedl, M. A. Disturbance suppresses the aboveground carbon sink in North American boreal forests. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 435–441 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01027-4
Kurz, W. A. et al. Carbon in Canada’s boreal forest — a synthesis. Environ. Rev. 21, 260–292 (2013).
doi: 10.1139/er-2013-0041
Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate1633
Gutman, G. & Radeloff, V. (eds) Land-cover and Land-use Changes in Eastern Europe after the Collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 (Springer, 2017).
Walker, X. J. et al. Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils. Nature 572, 520–523 (2019).
pubmed: 31435055
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1474-y
Kauppi, P. E. et al. Managing existing forests can mitigate climate change. For. Ecol. Manage. 513, 120186 (2022).
Henttonen, H. M., Nöjd, P. & Mäkinen, H. Environment-induced growth changes in forests of Finland revisited – a follow-up using an extended data set from the 1960s to the 2020s. For. Ecol. Manage. 551, 121515 (2024).
Korosuo, A. et al. The role of forests in the EU climate policy: are we on the right track? Carbon Balance Manage. 18, 15 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00234-0
Yang, C. et al. Updated estimation of forest biomass carbon pools in China, 1977–2018. Biogeosciences 19, 2989–2999 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/bg-19-2989-2022
Domke, G. C. et al. in Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report (eds Cavallaro, N. et al.) Ch. 9 (U.S. Global Change Research Program, 2018). https://doi.org/10.7930/SOCCR2.2018.Ch9 .
Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 792–796 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate1853
Hlásny, T. et al. Living With Bark Beetles: Impacts, Outlook and Management Options. From Science to Policy 8 (European Forest Institute, 2019).
Salomón, R. L. et al. The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests. Nat. Commun. 13, 28 (2022).
pubmed: 35013178
pmcid: 8748979
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27579-9
Forestry Agency, Japan. State of Japan’s Forests and Forest Management: 3rd Country Report of Japan to the Montreal Process https://www.maff.go.jp/e/policies/forestry/attach/pdf/index-8.pdf (2019).
Vijay, V., Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N. & Smith, S. J. The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PLoS ONE 11, e0159668 (2016).
pubmed: 27462984
pmcid: 4963098
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159668
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).
pubmed: 32132693
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0
Phillips, O. L. et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323, 1344–1347 (2009).
pubmed: 19265020
doi: 10.1126/science.1164033
Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F. & Nepstad, D. The 2010 Amazon drought. Science 331, 554 (2011).
pubmed: 21292971
doi: 10.1126/science.1200807
IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/ (2019).
Brienen, R. J. W. et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 519, 344–348 (2015).
pubmed: 25788097
doi: 10.1038/nature14283
IPCC. Climate Change 2014–Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects: Working Group II contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (eds Barros, V. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415386
Phillips, C. A. et al. Escalating carbon emissions from North American boreal forest wildfires and the climate mitigation potential of fire management. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl7161 (2022).
pubmed: 35476444
pmcid: 9045718
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl7161
Law, B. E. et al. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3663–3668 (2018).
pubmed: 29555758
pmcid: 5889652
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720064115
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
pubmed: 24233722
doi: 10.1126/science.1244693
Arneth, A. et al. Restoring degraded lands. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 569–599 (2021).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809
Sasaki, N. et al. Sustainable management of tropical forests can reduce carbon emissions and stabilize timber production. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00050 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00050
Hurteau, M. D., North, M. P., Koch, G. W. & Hungate, B. A. Managing for disturbance stabilizes forest carbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10193–10195 (2019).
pubmed: 31113888
pmcid: 6535006
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905146116
Thom, D. et al. The climate sensitivity of carbon, timber, and species richness covaries with forest age in boreal–temperate North America. Global Change Biol. 25, 2446–2458 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14656
Birdsey, R. et al. Climate, economic, and environmental impacts of producing wood for bioenergy. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 050201 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab9d5
Food and Agriculture Organization Global Forest Resource Assessment 2020: Main Report https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en (2020).
Murdiyarso, D., Kauffman, J. B. & Verchot, L. Climate change mitigation strategies should include tropical wetlands. Carbon Manage. 4, 491–499 (2014).
doi: 10.4155/cmt.13.46
IPCC. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (eds Penman, J. et al.) http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.html (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2003).
IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006).
Houghton, R. A. & Castanho, A. Annual emissions of carbon from land use, land-use change, and forestry from 1850 to 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 2025–2054 (2023).
doi: 10.5194/essd-15-2025-2023
Houghton, R. A. Terrestrial fluxes of carbon in GCP carbon budgets. Global Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.1505 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.1505
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
pubmed: 32968258
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x
King, A. W. et al. (eds) The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The North American Carbon Budget and Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Climatic Data Center, 2007).
Lang, N. et al. Global canopy height regression and uncertainty estimation from GEDI LIDAR waveforms with deep ensembles. Remote Sens. Environ. 268, 112760 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112760
Bastos, A. et al. Sources of uncertainty in regional and global terrestrial CO
doi: 10.1029/2019GB006393
Ciais, P. et al. Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-II). Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 1289–1316 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022
O’Sullivan, M. et al. Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 13, 4781 (2022).
pubmed: 35970991
pmcid: 9378641
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32416-8
Fatichi, S., Pappas, C., Zscheischler, J. & Leuzinger, S. Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation. New Phytol. 221, 652–668 (2019).
pubmed: 30339280
doi: 10.1111/nph.15451