"I've lost my children to vaping": A frame analysis of the Australian media's construction of the "Youth vaping crisis".

Australia E-cigarettes Framing analysis Media Nicotine vaping products

Journal

The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 16 01 2024
revised: 08 05 2024
accepted: 29 06 2024
medline: 19 7 2024
pubmed: 19 7 2024
entrez: 18 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Youth vaping has become an issue of extreme concern in the Australian public and political discourse, recently culminating in the announcement of further restrictions on the sale and use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) by the Federal Government. We examine how youth vaping has been framed in the Australian news media in the six months leading up to the announcement of these new measures in May 2023. Drawing a sample from the Factiva database, we conducted a frame analysis on articles published during this six month period, identifying media framings that included the necessary components of a distinct Problem Definition, Causal Attribution, Moral Evaluation, and Treatment Recommendation. We identified 123 relevant articles, and four dominant framings being applied. Most common was that of A Failure of Control, followed by A Poisonous Epidemic, A Health Behaviour Needing Regulation, and A Moral Failure. These findings are discussed in the context of moral panic theory and how framings are constructed by the media in collaboration with policy actors to support particular policy measures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Youth vaping has become an issue of extreme concern in the Australian public and political discourse, recently culminating in the announcement of further restrictions on the sale and use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) by the Federal Government. We examine how youth vaping has been framed in the Australian news media in the six months leading up to the announcement of these new measures in May 2023.
METHODS METHODS
Drawing a sample from the Factiva database, we conducted a frame analysis on articles published during this six month period, identifying media framings that included the necessary components of a distinct Problem Definition, Causal Attribution, Moral Evaluation, and Treatment Recommendation.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 123 relevant articles, and four dominant framings being applied. Most common was that of A Failure of Control, followed by A Poisonous Epidemic, A Health Behaviour Needing Regulation, and A Moral Failure.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These findings are discussed in the context of moral panic theory and how framings are constructed by the media in collaboration with policy actors to support particular policy measures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39024689
pii: S0955-3959(24)00198-1
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104513
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104513

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Samuel Brookfield (S)

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Electronic address: s.brookfield@uq.edu.au.

Nathan A Chye (NA)

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.

Nicholas Carah (N)

School of Communication and Arts, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Coral Gartner (C)

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.

Classifications MeSH