Honey bee colonies can buffer short-term stressor effects of pollen restriction and fungicide exposure on colony development and the microbiome.

Apis mellifera Brood development Combined stressors Nectar yeast Resource limitation

Journal

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
ISSN: 1090-2414
Titre abrégé: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7805381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 19 04 2024
revised: 04 07 2024
accepted: 09 07 2024
medline: 19 7 2024
pubmed: 19 7 2024
entrez: 18 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) have to withstand various environmental stressors alone or in combination in agriculture settings. Plant protection products are applied to achieve high crop yield, but residues of their active substances are frequently detected in bee matrices and could affect honey bee colonies. In addition, intensified agriculture could lead to resource limitation for honey bees. This study aimed to compare the response of full-sized and nucleus colonies to the combined stressors of fungicide exposure and resource limitation. A large-scale field study was conducted simultaneously at five different locations across Germany, starting in spring 2022 and continuing through spring 2023. The fungicide formulation Pictor® Active (active ingredients boscalid and pyraclostrobin) was applied according to label instructions at the maximum recommended rate on oil seed rape crops. Resource limitation was ensured by pollen restriction using a pollen trap and stressor responses were evaluated by assessing colony development, brood development, and core gut microbiome alterations. Furthermore, effects on the plant nectar microbiome were assessed since nectar inhabiting yeast are beneficial for pollination. We showed, that honey bee colonies were able to compensate for the combined stressor effects within six weeks. Nucleus colonies exposed to the combined stressors showed a short-term response with a less favorable brood to bee ratio and reduced colony development in May. No further impacts were observed in either the nucleus colonies or the full-sized colonies from July until the following spring. In addition, no fungicide-dependent differences were found in core gut and nectar microbiomes, and these differences were not distinguishable from local or environmental effects. Therefore, the provision of sufficient resources is important to increase the resilience of honey bees to a combination of stressors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39024947
pii: S0147-6513(24)00799-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116723
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

116723

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Karoline Wueppenhorst (K)

Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig 38104, Germany; Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelsohnstraße 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. Electronic address: karoline.wueppenhorst@gmail.com.

Abdulrahim T Alkassab (AT)

Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig 38104, Germany.

Hannes Beims (H)

Fachberatung für Imkerei, Bezirk Oberbayern, Prinzregentenstraße 14, München 80538, Germany; Institute for Apicuture, Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Herzogin-Eleonore-Allee 5, Celle 29221, Germany.

Ulrich Ernst (U)

State Institute of Bee Research, University of Hohenheim, Erna-Hruschka-Weg 6, Stuttgart 70599, Germany; KomBioTa - Center for Biodiversity and Integrative Taxonomy, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Elsa Friedrich (E)

State Institute of Bee Research, University of Hohenheim, Erna-Hruschka-Weg 6, Stuttgart 70599, Germany.

Ingrid Illies (I)

Institute for Bee Research and Beekeeping, Bavarian State Institute for Viticulture and Horticulture, An der Steige 15, Veitshöchheim 97209, Germany.

Martina Janke (M)

Institute for Apicuture, Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Herzogin-Eleonore-Allee 5, Celle 29221, Germany.

Wolfgang H Kirchner (WH)

Behavioral Biology and Biology Education, Ruhr-University-Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44780, Germany.

Kim Seidel (K)

Institute for Apicuture, Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Herzogin-Eleonore-Allee 5, Celle 29221, Germany.

Michael Steinert (M)

Institute for Microbiology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Spielmannstraße 7, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.

Andrey Yurkov (A)

DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Leibnitz Institute, Inhoffenstraße 7b, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.

Silvio Erler (S)

Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig 38104, Germany; Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelsohnstraße 4, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.

Richard Odemer (R)

Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig 38104, Germany.

Classifications MeSH