Development and testing of an efficient micropollutant monitoring strategy across a large watershed.

Composite sampling Deriving emission factors Persistent organic pollutants – POP Potentially toxic elements – PTE Regionalized pathway analysis Smart monitoring

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 15 01 2024
revised: 09 07 2024
accepted: 11 07 2024
medline: 19 7 2024
pubmed: 19 7 2024
entrez: 18 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In recent decades, extensive monitoring programmes have been conducted at the national, international, and project levels with the objective of expanding our understanding of the contamination of surface waters with micropollutants, which are often referred to as hazardous substances (HS). It has been demonstrated that HS enter surface waters via a number of pathways, including groundwater, atmospheric deposition, soil erosion, and urban systems. Given the ever-growing list of substances and the high resource demand associated with laboratory analysis, it is common practice to quantify the listed pathways based on emission factors derived from temporally and spatially constrained monitoring programmes. The derivation calculations are subject to high uncertainties, and substantial knowledge gaps remain regarding the relative importance of the unique pathways, territories, and periods. This publication presents a monitoring method designed to quantify the unique emission pathways of HS in large geographical areas characterized by differences in land use, population, and economic development. The method will be tested for a wide range of HS (ubiquitous organic and inorganic pollutants, pesticides, pharmaceuticals) throughout small sub-catchments located on tributaries. The results of the test application demonstrate a high diversity of both emission loads and instream concentrations throughout different regions for numerous substances. Riverine concentrations are found to be highly dependent on the flow status. Soil concentration levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are found to be in proportion, whereas that of potentially toxic elements (PTE) in a reverse relationship with economic development. In many instances, concentration levels are also contingent upon land use. The findings of this study reinforce the necessity for the implementation of harmonised and concerted HS monitoring programmes, which should encompass a diverse range of substances, emission sources, pathways and geographical areas. This is essential for the reliable development of emission factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39025144
pii: S0048-9697(24)04909-X
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174760
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

174760

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Máté Krisztián Kardos (MK)

National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Security, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Műegyetem rakpart 3, 1111 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: kardos.mate@emk.bme.hu.

Adrienne Clement (A)

National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Security, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Műegyetem rakpart 3, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.

Zsolt Jolánkai (Z)

National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Security, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Műegyetem rakpart 3, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.

Matthias Zessner (M)

TU Wien, Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Wien, Austria.

Steffen Kittlaus (S)

TU Wien, Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Wien, Austria.

Nikolaus Weber (N)

TU Wien, Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Wien, Austria.

Oliver Gabriel (O)

Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Marianne Bertine Broer (MB)

Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Florentina Soare (F)

National Administration Romanian Waters, Str. Edgar Quinet no. 6, Sector 1, 010018 Bucharest, Romania.

Carmen Hamchevici (C)

National Administration Romanian Waters, Str. Edgar Quinet no. 6, Sector 1, 010018 Bucharest, Romania.

Mugurel Sidau (M)

National Administration Romanian Waters, Str. Edgar Quinet no. 6, Sector 1, 010018 Bucharest, Romania.

Radoslav Tonev (R)

Bulgarian Water Association, Hristo Smirnenski blvd 1, 1046 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Radmila Milačič (R)

Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Janez Ščančar (J)

Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Milena Horvat (M)

Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Katarina Marković (K)

Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Sandra Kulcsar (S)

Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Andrea Schuhmann (A)

Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Gábor Bordós (G)

Eurofins Analytical Services Hungary Ltd., Anonymus utca 6., 1045 Budapest, Hungary.

Eszter Pataj (E)

Eurofins Analytical Services Hungary Ltd., Anonymus utca 6., 1045 Budapest, Hungary.

Ottavia Zoboli (O)

TU Wien, Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Wien, Austria.

Classifications MeSH