Adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy of resected skin melanoma: an example of non-personalized medicine with no overall survival benefit.
adjuvant immunotherapy
anti-PD1
financial toxicity
melanoma
personalized medicine
Journal
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
26
03
2024
revised:
02
07
2024
accepted:
06
07
2024
medline:
19
7
2024
pubmed:
19
7
2024
entrez:
18
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to all comers based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39025250
pii: S1040-8428(24)00186-0
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104443
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104443Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SO received honoraria and travel grants from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, and Roche. MP received honoraria from: Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Astra Zeneca, Gilead, and Janssen. RPM received honoraria and travel grants from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Roche. ORM declares no conflict of interest.