Radiographic evaluation of anterior tibial translation in the prone position after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of BCS-TKA and PS-TKA.

Bi-cruciate substituting Posterior stabilized Prone position Total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Musculoskeletal surgery

ISSN: 2035-5114

Titre abrégé: Musculoskelet Surg

Pays: Italy

ID NLM: 101498346

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jul 2024

Historique:

received: 18 07 2023

accepted: 14 07 2024

medline: 19 7 2024

pubmed: 19 7 2024

entrez: 18 7 2024

Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anterior tibial translation (ATT) in the prone position after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Fifty subjects (50 knees) undergoing bi-cruciate substituting (BCS)-TKA (Journey II: Smith and Nephew) and age-gender matching 50 subjects (50 knees) undergoing posterior stabilizing (PS)-TKA, were included in this study. Approximately, six months after surgery, and when the subjects had recovered their range of knee motion, following the Mae's method, accurate lateral radiographic imaging of the knee was performed with full knee extension in both supine and prone positions. The maximal protrusion length of the femoral posterior component, posterior to the extension line parallel to the tibial shaft from the edge of the posterior tibial plateau, was measured on lateral radiographs. The difference in length between the prone and supine positions was regarded as the prone-ATT. The posterior protrusion length of the femoral component, and the prone-ATT were compared between BCS and PS-TKA. The posterior protrusion length of the femoral component in the supine position was BCS-TKA 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, and PS-TKA 8.7 ± 2.3 mm. The length in the prone position was BCS-TKA 4.8 ± 2.3 mm, and PS-TKA 10.7 ± 2.2 m. Posterior protrusion length of the femoral component was significantly larger in both positions in PS-TKA when compared with BCS-TKA. In PS-TKA, posterior protrusion length of the femoral condyle was significantly larger in the prone position when compared to the supine position. No significant difference was observed in BCS-TKA. Prone-ATT was significantly larger in PS-TKA (2 ± 1.9 mm) when compared to BCS-TKA (0.7 ± 2 mm). Even in a position corresponding to daily movement such as the prone position, ATT was significantly larger in PS-TKA, when compared to BCS-TKA.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1007/s12306-024-00849-7 PMID: 39026045

pubmed: 39026045

doi: 10.1007/s12306-024-00849-7

pii: 10.1007/s12306-024-00849-7

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Informations de copyright

Références

Dutka J, Sorysz T, Dobosz B, Skowronek M (2012) Total knee arthroplasty with application of anatomic endoprosthesis journey. Clinical and radiological assessment in a 2-year follow-up. Pol Orthop Traumatol 77:1–4

pubmed: 23306278

Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O (2013) I can’t get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J 95-B(11):148–152

doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32767 pubmed: 24187375

Thorborg K, Bandholm T, Holmich P (2013) Hip- and knee-strength assessments using a hand-held dynamometer with external belt-fixation are inter-tester reliable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:550–555

doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2115-2 pubmed: 22773065

Catani F, Innocenti B, Belvedere C, Labey L, Ensini A, Leardini A (2010) The mark coventry award: articular contact estimation in TKA using in vivo kinematics and finite element analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:19–28

doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0941-4 pubmed: 19548042

Digennaro V, Zambianchi F, Marcovigi A, Mugnai R (2014) Design and kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:227–233

doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2245-2 pubmed: 24420156 pmcid: 3923950

Halewood C, Risebury M, Thomas NP, Amis AA (2014) Kinematic behaviour and soft tissue management in guided motion total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3074–3082

doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2933-5 pubmed: 24643357

Kuroyanagi Y, Mu S, Hamai S, Robb WJ, Banks SA (2012) In vivo knee kinematics during stair and deep flexion activities in patients with bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:122–128

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.005 pubmed: 21507605

Morra EA, Rosca M, Greenwald JFI, Greenwald AS (2008) The influence of contemporary knee design on high flexion: a kinematic comparison with the normal knee. J Bone Joint Surg AM 90:195–201

doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00817 pubmed: 18984731

Mugnai R, Digennaro V, Ensini A, Leardini A, Catani F (2014) Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:581–589

doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2509-9 pubmed: 23632757

Christen B, Neukamp M, Aghayev E (2014) Consecutive series of 226 journey bicruciate substituting total knee replacements: early complication and revision rates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:395

doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-395 pubmed: 25424844 pmcid: 4289326

Mae T, Shino K, Hiramatsu K, Tachibana Y, Nakagawa S, Yoshikawa H (2018) Anterior laxity of the knee assessed with gravity stress radiograph. Skeletal Radiol 47(10):1349–1355

doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2941-5 pubmed: 29656302

Iriuchishima T, Ryu K (2019) Bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty improves stair climbing ability when compared with cruciate-retain or posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 53(5):641–645

doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_392_18 pubmed: 31488934 pmcid: 6699219

Iriuchishima T, Ryu K (2018) A Comparison of rollback ratio between bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty and oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31(6):568–572

doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604445 pubmed: 28743140

Takubo A, Ryu K, Iriuchishima T, Tokuhashi Y (2017) Comparison of muscle recovery following bicruciate substituting versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty in the asian population. J Knee Surg 30(7):725–729

doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597977 pubmed: 28068727