Metrics for Success in a Surgical Innovation Fellowship.

The nature of a dedicated research time during surgical residency has evolved from a traditional basic science laboratory experience to include translational and outcomes research, investigations in improving surgical education, secondary degrees, and other clinical fellowships as trainees have sought an increasingly wide range of experiences. Moreover, many surgical specialties have seen a burst of innovation with new devices, implants, tools, and software to improve the care of surgical patients and minimize complications. This environment has led to a surge in interest in innovation, often focused on surgical device development. Despite this groundswell of interest in innovation at the trainee and program level, there is little structure or curriculum available which outlines a formalized pathway for innovation within a surgical residency, nor is there information on how the success of that program may be evaluated. We present the model we developed for a Surgical Innovation Fellowship and propose means for evaluation of the success of that fellowship.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.