"Let's Chat!" Improving Emergency Department Staff Satisfaction with the Medication Reconciliation Process.
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
25
05
2023
revised:
16
02
2024
accepted:
28
02
2024
medline:
19
7
2024
pubmed:
19
7
2024
entrez:
19
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients who stay in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods of time require verification of home medications, a process known as medication reconciliation. The complex nature of medication reconciliation can lead to adverse events and staff dissatisfaction. A multidisciplinary team was formed to improve accuracy, timing, and staff satisfaction with the medication reconciliation process. Between November 2021-January 2022, stakeholders were surveyed to identify gaps in the medication reconciliation process. This project implemented education on role-specific tasks, as well as a "Let's chat!" huddle, bringing together the entire care team to perform medication reconciliation. We used real-time evaluations by frontline staff to evaluate effectiveness during plan- do-study-act cycles and obtain feedback. Following the implementation period, stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey between June-July 2022, using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = very dissatisfied to 3 = very satisfied). We calculated the change in staff satisfaction from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Differences in proportions and 95% confidence intervals are reported. This study adhered to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) and followed the Lean Six Sigma rapid cycle process improvement (define-measure-analyze-improve-control). A total of 111 front-line ED staff (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, nurses) completed the pre-intervention survey (of 350 ED staff, corresponding to a 31.7% response rate), and 89 stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey (a 25.4% response rate). Subjective feedback from staff identifying causes of low satisfaction with the initial process included the following: complexity of process; unclear delineation of staff roles; time burden to completion; high patient volume; and lack of standardized communication of task completion. Overall satisfaction improved after the intervention. The greatest improvement was seen in the correct medication (difference 20.7%, confidence interval [CI] 6.3-33.9%, There is a steep learning curve to educate multidisciplinary staff on a new process and implement the associated changes. With goals to impact the safety of our patients and reduce negative outcomes, engagement and awareness of the team involved in the medication reconciliation process is critical to improve staff satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39028249
doi: 10.5811/westjem.18324
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
624-633Références
C Baloescu, J Kinsman, S Ravi, et al. The cost of waiting: association of ED boarding with hospitalization costs. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;40:169–72.
J Koehl, A Steffenhagen, J Halfpap. Implementation and impact of pharmacist-initiated home medication ordering in an emergency department observation unit. J Pharm Pract. 2021;34(3):459–64.
JE Prey, F Polubriaginof, L Grossman, et al. Engaging hospital patients in the medication reconciliation process using tablet computers, JAMIA. 2018;25(11):1460–9.
S Kripalani, K Hart, C Schaninger, et al. Use of a tablet computer application to engage patients in updating their medication list. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019;76(5):293–300.
The Joint Commission. National patient safety goals
A Chhabra, A Quinn, A Ries, et al. Evaluation of time spent by pharmacists and nurses based on the location of pharmacist involvement in medication history collection. J Pharm Pract. 2019;32(4):394–8.
The Joint Commission. 2022 National Patient Safety Goals. 2018. Updated October 25, 2021. pg. 5. Accessed July 21, 2022. dc8fdcbf-7cab-426c-b0d7-ee12c5b6817c (jointcommission.org).
DJ Van der Nat, M Taks, V Huiskes, et al. Risk factors for clinically relevant deviations in patients’ medication lists reported by patients in personal health records: a prospective cohort study in a hospital setting. Int J Clinical pharmacy. 2022;44(2):539–47.
C Moore, J Wisnivesky, S Williams, et al. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.
C Ellison, K Hackett, D Lendrem, et al. Exploring medicines reconciliation in the emergency assessment unit: staff perceptions and actual waiting times. Emerg Nurse. 2020;28(5):28–33.
Minesota Legislature. Minnesota administrative rules: § 6800.3850 Pharmacy Technicians. 2017. Available at: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/6800.3850/#rule.6800.3850.2. Accessed July 21, 2022.
PJ Bridgeman, KO Rynn. Medication reconciliation in the emergency department. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(24),2325–6.
BD Hayes, JL Donovan, BS Smith. Pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation in an emergency department. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(16):1720–3.
MA Pérez-Moreno, JM Rodríguez-Camacho, B Calderón-Hernanz, et al. Clinical relevance of pharmacist intervention in an emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2017;34(8):495–501.
D Eisenmann, F Stroben, JD Gerken, et al. Interprofessional emergency training leads to changes in the workplace. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):185–92.
G Ogrinc, L Davies, D Goodman, et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–92.
Qualtrics. Copyright 2020. Updated May 2022. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com. Accessed May 20, 2022.
F Federico. The five rights of medication administration. 2007. Available at: ∼https://www.ihi.org/insights/five-rights-medication-administration#:∼:text=One%20of%20the%20recommendations%20to,route%2C%20and%20the%20right%20time. Accessed May 24, 2023.
LT Southerland, KM Hunold, J Van Fossen, et al. An implementation science approach to geriatric screening in an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(1):178–87.
E Hitti, H Tamim, R Bakhti, et al. Impact of internally developed electronic prescription on prescribing errors at discharge from the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5):943–50.
CR Carpenter, LT Southerland, BP Lucey, et al. Around the EQUATOR with clinician-scientists transdisciplinary aging research (Clin-STAR) principles: implementation science challenges and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(12):3620–30.
H Pinnock, M Barwick, CR Carpenter, et al. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.