A cross-sectional study of physicians on fluoride-related beliefs and practices, and experiences with fluoride-hesitant caregivers.
Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Male
Female
Caregivers
Fluorides
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Middle Aged
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ohio
Dental Caries
/ prevention & control
Physicians
/ psychology
Washington
Oral Health
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
09
05
2024
accepted:
29
06
2024
medline:
19
7
2024
pubmed:
19
7
2024
entrez:
19
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of this study was to describe medical providers' fluoride-related beliefs and practices, experiences with fluoride-hesitant caregivers, and barriers to incorporating oral health activities into their practice. In this cross-sectional study, we specifically tested the hypothesis of whether these factors differed between pediatric and family medicine providers. A 39-item online survey was administered to a convenience sample of pediatric and family medicine providers in Washington state and Ohio (U.S.A.). Responses to the fluoride survey were compared between pediatric and family medicine providers with a chi-square test (α = 0.05). Of the 354 study participants, 45% were pediatric providers and 55% were family medicine providers. About 61.9% of providers believed fluoridated water was highly effective at preventing tooth decay while only 29.1% believed prescription fluoride supplements were highly effective. Nearly all providers recommend over-the-counter fluoride toothpaste (87.3%), 44.1% apply topical fluoride in clinic, and 30.8% prescribe fluoride supplements. Most providers reported fluoride hesitancy was a small problem or not a problem (82.5%) and the most common concerns patients raise about fluoride were similar to those raised about vaccines. Lack of time was the most commonly reported barrier to incorporating oral health into practice, which was more commonly reported by family medicine providers than pediatric providers (65.6% vs. 50.3%; p = .005). Pediatric and family medicine providers have early and frequent access to children before children visit a dentist. Improving the use of fluorides through children's medical visits could improve pediatric oral health and reduce oral health inequities, especially for vulnerable populations at increased risk for tooth decay.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39028748
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307085
pii: PONE-D-24-16749
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorides
Q80VPU408O
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0307085Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Bass et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.