Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage during caesarean section in patients at high risk of bleeding.

Bleeding risk factors Carbetocin Cesarean section Oxytocin Postpartum hemorrhage

Journal

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 10 08 2023
revised: 30 06 2024
accepted: 07 07 2024
medline: 20 7 2024
pubmed: 20 7 2024
entrez: 19 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the efficacy of carbetocin versus oxytocin in preventing postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in women with risk factors for PPH who were delived by caesarean section. This retrospective, monocentric, before-and-after cohort study assessed patients with haemorrhagic risk factors who underwent caesarean section after 24 weeks of gestation and who had haemorrhagic risk factors between August 2014 to December 2019. This study enrolled 518 patients, including 250 in the oxytocin group and 268 in the carbetocin group. The use of carbetocin was independently associated with a PPH decrease compared to oxytocin use (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.79; p = 0.002). Carbetocin use was associated with a reduction in the need for therapy escalation (6 % vs 10.8 %; p = 0.046). Carbetocin was more effective than oxytocin in preventing PPH after caesarean section in high-risk patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39029242
pii: S0301-2115(24)00350-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

206-210

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mélanie Delavallade (M)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

Agathe Vaunois (A)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

Mathilde Cellier (M)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

Yasmine Boukerfa-Bennacer (Y)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

Céline Chauleur (C)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France; INSERM U1059 Sainbiose, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France.

Tiphaine Raia-Barjat (T)

Department of Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France; INSERM U1059 Sainbiose, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France. Electronic address: tiphaine.barjat@chu-st-etienne.fr.

Classifications MeSH