Bone consolidation under septic condition and hardware retention: about 69 patients.
Bone
Fracture
Fracture fixation
Fracture healing
Osteitis
Surgical wound infection
Journal
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jul 2024
18 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
22
06
2023
revised:
12
04
2024
accepted:
18
04
2024
medline:
20
7
2024
pubmed:
20
7
2024
entrez:
19
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Management of infection on internal fixation hardware is particularly complex. The main aim of the present study was to assess bone consolidation rates under septic conditions in patients treated for bone and joint infection (BJI) with hardware retention. Secondary objectives were to determine a time limit beyond which it is unreasonable to retain hardware, and to assess risk factors for non-consolidation and functional results. The study hypothesis was that bone consolidation is possible under septic conditions without hardware exchange. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on 69 patients for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019. We included all patients aged over 15 years with infection after internal fixation or fusion whose files had been discussed in the multidisciplinary team meeting during the study period. Bone healing was screened for on X-ray or CT. Study data comprised type of fracture, smoking status, time to treatment for open fracture, initial surgery time, type of hardware, interval between fixation and revision, and type of irrigation. Functional results were assessed at follow-up: walking, pain, return to work and SF12 and QuickDASH scores. The bone healing rate was 73.5% (50/68 patients) at a mean 24 weeks (range, 6-68 weeks). Time to revision did not significantly impact consolidation: 60% for 2 weeks (6/10 cases), 80% for 2-10 weeks (35/40 cases), and 64% for >10 weeks (9/14 cases) (p = 0.28). Smoking, longer initial surgery time and Gustilo type IIIb or IIIc were significant risks factors for non-consolidation. Bone consolidation under septic conditions with hardware retention adhering to an established medical and surgical protocol was reliable and straightforward, without extra morbidity. These findings are encouraging, and in line with the literature. We were unable to determine a time limit beyond which hardware prevented healing. IV; descriptive epidemiological study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39030127
pii: S1877-0568(24)00198-1
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103942
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103942Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.