Reporting guidelines for precision medicine research of clinical relevance: the BePRECISE checklist.
Journal
Nature medicine
ISSN: 1546-170X
Titre abrégé: Nat Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502015
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
21
03
2024
accepted:
29
04
2024
medline:
20
7
2024
pubmed:
20
7
2024
entrez:
19
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Precision medicine should aspire to reduce error and improve accuracy in medical and health recommendations by comparison with contemporary practice, while maintaining safety and cost-effectiveness. The etiology, clinical manifestation and prognosis of diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and fatty liver disease are heterogeneous. Without standardized reporting, this heterogeneity, combined with the diversity of research tools used in precision medicine studies, makes comparisons across studies and implementation of the findings challenging. Specific recommendations for reporting precision medicine research do not currently exist. The BePRECISE (Better Precision-data Reporting of Evidence from Clinical Intervention Studies & Epidemiology) consortium, comprising 23 experts in precision medicine, cardiometabolic diseases, statistics, editorial and lived experience, conducted a scoping review and participated in a modified Delphi and nominal group technique process to develop guidelines for reporting precision medicine research. The BePRECISE checklist comprises 23 items organized into 5 sections that align with typical sections of a scientific publication. A specific section about health equity serves to encourage precision medicine research to be inclusive of individuals and communities that are traditionally under-represented in clinical research and/or underserved by health systems. Adoption of BePRECISE by investigators, reviewers and editors will facilitate and accelerate equitable clinical implementation of precision medicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39030405
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03033-3
pii: 10.1038/s41591-024-03033-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1874-1881Subventions
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council)
ID : #2019-01348
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council)
ID : 2018-02837
Organisme : Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research)
ID : LUDC-IRC, 15-0067
Organisme : Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research)
ID : LUDC-IRC, 15-0067
Organisme : Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)
ID : 115974 - BEAt-DKD
Organisme : Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)
ID : 115974 - BEAt-DKD
Organisme : RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC)
ID : MR/N00633X/1
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation)
ID : NNF23SA0084103, NNF18CC0034900, NNF20OC0059313
Organisme : JDRF
ID : 2-SRA-202201260-S-B
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Références
Chung, W. K. et al. Precision medicine in diabetes: a consensus report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 43, 1617–1635 (2020).
doi: 10.2337/dci20-0022
pubmed: 32561617
pmcid: 7305007
Chung, W. K. et al. Precision medicine in diabetes: a consensus report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 63, 1671–1693 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05181-w
pubmed: 32556613
pmcid: 8185455
Tobias, D. K. et al. Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine. Nat. Med. 29, 2438–2457 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02502-5
pubmed: 37794253
pmcid: 10735053
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 396, 1204–1222 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
Sun, H. et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 183, 109119 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119
pubmed: 34879977
Ahmad, A. et al. Precision prognostics for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun. Med. 4, 11 (2024).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00429-z
pubmed: 38253823
pmcid: 10803333
Semnani-Azad, Z. et al. Precision stratification of prognostic risk factors associated with outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Commun. Med. 4, 9 (2024).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00427-1
pubmed: 38216688
pmcid: 10786838
Francis, E. C. et al. Refining the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun. Med. 3, 185 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00393-8
pubmed: 38110524
pmcid: 10728189
Misra, S. et al. Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Commun. Med. 3, 138 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00360-3
pubmed: 37798471
pmcid: 10556101
Benham, J. L. et al. Precision gestational diabetes treatment: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Commun. Med. 3, 135 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00371-0
pubmed: 37794196
pmcid: 10550921
Felton, J. L. et al. Disease-modifying therapies and features linked to treatment response in type 1 diabetes prevention: a systematic review. Commun. Med. 3, 130 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00357-y
pubmed: 37794169
pmcid: 10550983
Murphy, R. et al. The use of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes: a systematic review and expert opinion. Commun. Med. 3, 136 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00369-8
pubmed: 37794142
pmcid: 10550998
Lim, S. et al. Participant characteristics in the prevention of gestational diabetes as evidence for precision medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun. Med. 3, 137 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00366-x
pubmed: 37794119
pmcid: 10551015
Jacobsen, L. M. et al. Utility and precision evidence of technology in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Commun. Med. 3, 132 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00358-x
pubmed: 37794113
pmcid: 10550996
Semple, R. K., Patel, K. A., Auh, S., Ada/Easd, P. & Brown, R. J. Genotype-stratified treatment for monogenic insulin resistance: a systematic review. Commun. Med. 3, 134 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00368-9
pubmed: 37794082
pmcid: 10550936
Naylor, R. N. et al. Systematic review of treatment of beta-cell monogenic diabetes. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.12.23289807 (2023).
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D.& the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 7, e1000251 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251
pubmed: 20352064
pmcid: 2844794
Cuschieri, S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J. Anaesth. 13, S31–S34 (2019).
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18
pubmed: 30930717
pmcid: 6398292
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br. Med. J. 372, n71 (2021).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
O’Neill, J. et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 56–64 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005
pubmed: 24189091
Mirzayi, C. et al. Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist. Nat. Med. 27, 1885–1892 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01552-x
pubmed: 34789871
pmcid: 9105086
Hart, J. T. The inverse care law. Lancet i, 405–412 (1971).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92410-X
Kamiza, A. B. et al. Transferability of genetic risk scores in African populations. Nat. Med. 28, 1163–1166 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01835-x
pubmed: 35654908
pmcid: 9205766
Choudhury, A. et al. Meta-analysis of sub-Saharan African studies provides insights into genetic architecture of lipid traits. Nat. Commun. 13, 2578 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30098-w
pubmed: 35546142
pmcid: 9095599
Aiyegbusi, O. L. et al. Considerations for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research. Nat. Med. 29, 1922–1929 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02445-x
pubmed: 37474660
Retzer, A. et al. A toolkit for capturing a representative and equitable sample in health research. Nat. Med. 29, 3259–3267 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02665-1
pubmed: 38066209
pmcid: 10719102
Calvert, M. et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 309, 814–822 (2013).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.879
Calvert, M. et al. Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: the SPIRIT-PRO extension. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 319, 483–494 (2018).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903
Rankin, N. M. et al. Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 16, 110 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0210-7
pubmed: 27566679
pmcid: 5002198
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).
doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
pubmed: 30178033
Welch, V. A. et al. CONSORT-Equity 2017 extension and elaboration for better reporting of health equity in randomised trials. Br. Med. J. 359, j5085 (2017).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5085
Little, J. et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 39, 247–266 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02125.x
pubmed: 19297801
pmcid: 2730482