Needle-free jet injector treatment with bleomycin is efficacious in patients with severe keloids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Journal
Clinical and experimental dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2230
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7606847
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jul 2024
20 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
16
03
2024
revised:
21
05
2024
accepted:
18
07
2024
medline:
20
7
2024
pubmed:
20
7
2024
entrez:
20
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Severe keloids are difficult to treat. Corticosteroid injections with needles are painful and associated with frequent recurrences. Therefore, more effective, safe and patient friendly alternative treatments are urgently needed. To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of intralesional bleomycin treatment using a needle-free electronic pneumatic jet injector (EPI) in severe keloids. Patients with severe keloids were included in this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial with split-lesion design. Three EPI treatments with bleomycin or saline, were administered every four weeks in respectively the intervention and control side. Outcome measures were change in scar volume assessed by 3D-imaging, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), skin perfusion with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), spilled volume, procedure related pain, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Fourteen patients (9 female, 5 men) were included. The estimated mean keloid volume was significantly reduced with 20% after EPI-assisted bleomycin, compared to a slight increase of 3% in the control side (p<0.01). The estimated mean POSAS patient and observer scores decreased with respectively 26% and 28% (p = 0.02; p = 0.03). LSCI showed no significant change in perfusion. EPI treatment was preferred over previous needle injections in 85% of patients. The estimated mean spilled volume after EPI was around 50%, and NRS pain scores were moderate. Adverse events included bruising, hyperpigmentation, and transient superficial necrosis. Three EPI-assisted bleomycin treatments are efficacious and well-tolerated in severe keloids. Moreover, EPI treatment was preferred by most patients and may serve as a patient-friendly alternative treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Severe keloids are difficult to treat. Corticosteroid injections with needles are painful and associated with frequent recurrences. Therefore, more effective, safe and patient friendly alternative treatments are urgently needed.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of intralesional bleomycin treatment using a needle-free electronic pneumatic jet injector (EPI) in severe keloids.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with severe keloids were included in this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial with split-lesion design. Three EPI treatments with bleomycin or saline, were administered every four weeks in respectively the intervention and control side. Outcome measures were change in scar volume assessed by 3D-imaging, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), skin perfusion with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), spilled volume, procedure related pain, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fourteen patients (9 female, 5 men) were included. The estimated mean keloid volume was significantly reduced with 20% after EPI-assisted bleomycin, compared to a slight increase of 3% in the control side (p<0.01). The estimated mean POSAS patient and observer scores decreased with respectively 26% and 28% (p = 0.02; p = 0.03). LSCI showed no significant change in perfusion. EPI treatment was preferred over previous needle injections in 85% of patients. The estimated mean spilled volume after EPI was around 50%, and NRS pain scores were moderate. Adverse events included bruising, hyperpigmentation, and transient superficial necrosis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Three EPI-assisted bleomycin treatments are efficacious and well-tolerated in severe keloids. Moreover, EPI treatment was preferred by most patients and may serve as a patient-friendly alternative treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39030712
pii: 7717475
doi: 10.1093/ced/llae254
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.