Real life clinical outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: The STRIDER study.
Humans
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
/ drug therapy
Male
Female
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Adult
Aged, 80 and over
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Young Adult
Prednisone
/ therapeutic use
Salvage Therapy
Italy
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Vincristine
/ therapeutic use
Progression-Free Survival
Doxorubicin
/ therapeutic use
chemotherapy
diffuse large B cell lymphoma
real world
refractory disease
relapse
rituximab
transplantation
Journal
Cancer medicine
ISSN: 2045-7634
Titre abrégé: Cancer Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595310
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
11
06
2024
received:
13
03
2024
accepted:
24
06
2024
medline:
20
7
2024
pubmed:
20
7
2024
entrez:
20
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Relapse and refractory (R/R) rates after first-line R-CHOP in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are ~40% and ~15% respectively. We conducted a retrospective real-world analysis aimed at evaluating clinical outcomes of R/R DLBCL patients. Overall, 403 consecutive DLBCL patients treated in two large hematological centers in Torino, Italy were reviewed. At a median follow up of 50 months, 5-year overall survival from diagnosis (OS-1) was 66.5%, and 2-year progression free survival (PFS-1) was 68%. 134 (34.4%) patients relapsed (n = 46, 11.8%) or were refractory (n = 88, 22.6%) to R-CHOP. Most employed salvage treatments included platinum salt-based regimens in 38/134 (28.4%), lenalidomide in 14 (10.4%). Median OS and PFS after disease relapse or progression (OS-2 and PFS-2) were 6.7 and 5.1 months respectively. No significant difference in overall response rate, OS-2 or PFS-2 in patients treated with platinum-based regimens versus other regimens was observed. By multivariate analysis, age between 60 and 80 years, germinal center B cell type cell of origin and extranodal involvement of <2 sites were associated with better OS-2. Our findings confirm very poor outcomes of R/R DLBCL in the rituximab era. Widespread approval by national Medicine Agencies of novel treatments such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies as second-line is eagerly awaited to improve these outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Relapse and refractory (R/R) rates after first-line R-CHOP in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are ~40% and ~15% respectively.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a retrospective real-world analysis aimed at evaluating clinical outcomes of R/R DLBCL patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Overall, 403 consecutive DLBCL patients treated in two large hematological centers in Torino, Italy were reviewed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At a median follow up of 50 months, 5-year overall survival from diagnosis (OS-1) was 66.5%, and 2-year progression free survival (PFS-1) was 68%. 134 (34.4%) patients relapsed (n = 46, 11.8%) or were refractory (n = 88, 22.6%) to R-CHOP. Most employed salvage treatments included platinum salt-based regimens in 38/134 (28.4%), lenalidomide in 14 (10.4%). Median OS and PFS after disease relapse or progression (OS-2 and PFS-2) were 6.7 and 5.1 months respectively. No significant difference in overall response rate, OS-2 or PFS-2 in patients treated with platinum-based regimens versus other regimens was observed. By multivariate analysis, age between 60 and 80 years, germinal center B cell type cell of origin and extranodal involvement of <2 sites were associated with better OS-2.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings confirm very poor outcomes of R/R DLBCL in the rituximab era. Widespread approval by national Medicine Agencies of novel treatments such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies as second-line is eagerly awaited to improve these outcomes.
Substances chimiques
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
R-CHOP protocol
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e7448Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, et al. Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR‐1 study. Blood. 2017;130:1800‐1808. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620
Feugier P, van Hoof A, Sebban C, et al. Long‐term results of the R‐CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a study by the groupe d'etude des lymphomes de l'adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4117‐4126. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131
Petrich AM, Gandhi M, Jovanovic B, et al. Impact of induction regimen and stem cell transplantation on outcomes in double‐hit lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Blood. 2014;124:2354‐2361. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-05-578963
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:2375‐2390. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569
Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ, et al. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Med. 2018;24:679‐690. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0016-8
Lacy SE, Barrans SL, Beer PA, et al. Targeted sequencing in DLBCL, molecular subtypes, and outcomes: a Haematological malignancy research network report. Blood. 2020;135:1759‐1771. doi:10.1182/BLOOD.2019003535
Schmitz R, Wright GW, Huang DW, et al. Genetics and pathogenesis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1396‐1407. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1801445
Wright GW, Huang DW, Phelan JD, et al. A probabilistic classification tool for genetic subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma with therapeutic implications. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:551‐568.e14. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.015
Coiffier B, Lepage E, Brière J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large‐B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:235‐242. doi:10.1056/nejmoa011795
Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, et al. Long‐term outcome of patients in the LNH‐98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab‐CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Blood. 2010;116(12):2040‐2045. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-03-276246
Pfreundschuh M, Trümper L, Osterborg A, et al. CHOP‐like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP‐like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good‐prognosis diffuse large‐B‐cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera international trial (MInT) group. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:379‐391. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70664-7
Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Sehn LH, et al. Polatuzumab vedotin in previously untreated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:351‐363. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2115304
Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, et al. Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v116‐v125. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv304
Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, et al. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B‐cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4184‐4190. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1618
Kewalramani T, Zelenetz AD, Nimer SD, et al. Rituximab and ICE as second‐line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood. 2004;103(10):3684‐3688.
Crump M, Baetz T, Couban S, et al. Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory aggressive histology B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group (NCIC‐CTG). Cancer. 2004;101:1835‐1842. doi:10.1002/cncr.20587
Arboe B, Olsen MH, Gørløv JS, et al. Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in Denmark: A Real‐Life Populationbased Study. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:207‐216. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S178003
Pettengell R, Coiffier B, Narayanan G, et al. Pixantrone dimaleate versus other chemotherapeutic agents as a single‐agent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3, multicentre, open‐label, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:696‐706.
Czuczman MS, Trněný M, Davies A, et al. A phase 2/3 multicenter, randomized, open‐label study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4127‐4137. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2818
Klyuchnikov E, Bacher U, Kroll T, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for diffuse large B cell lymphoma: who, when and how. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:1‐7. doi:10.1038/bmt.2013.72
Izumi K, Kanda J, Nishikori M, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for DLBCL: a multi‐center study from the Kyoto stem cell transplantation group. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:2815‐2823. doi:10.1007/s00277-019-03835-3
Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T‐cell therapy in refractory large B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2531‐2544. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1707447
Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:45‐56. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1804980
Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B‐cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): A Multicentre Seamless Design Study. Lancet. 2020;396:839‐852. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0
Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second‐line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B‐cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open‐label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;399:2294‐2308.
Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, et al. Long‐term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B‐cell lymphoma (ZUMA‐1): a single‐arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:31‐42. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7
Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, et al. Long‐term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphomas (JULIET): A Multicentre, Open‐Label, Single‐Arm, Phase 2 Study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1403‐1415. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2
Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel as second‐line therapy for large B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:640‐654. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2116133
Salles G, Duell J, González Barca E, et al. Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (L‐MIND): A Multicentre, Prospective, Single‐Arm, Phase 2 Study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:978‐988. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30225-4
Sehn LH, Herrera AF, Flowers CR, et al. Polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:155‐165. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.00172
Caimi PF, Ai W, Alderuccio JP, et al. Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (LOTIS‐2): a multicentre, open‐label, single‐arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:790‐800. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00139-X
Kalakonda N, Maerevoet M, Cavallo F, et al. Selinexor in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (SADAL): a single‐arm, multinational, multicentre, open‐label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e511‐e522. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30120-4
Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI sponsored international working group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1244.
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of hodgkin and non‐hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059‐3067. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800
Crump M, Kuruvilla J, Couban S, et al. Randomized comparison of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin versus dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin chemotherapy before autologous stem‐cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive lymphomas: NCIC‐CTG LY.12. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3490‐3496. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.9593
Mounier N, el Gnaoui T, Tilly H, et al. Rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma who are not candidates for high‐dose therapy. A phase II lymphoma study association trial. Haematologica. 2013;98:1726‐1731. doi:10.3324/haematol.2013.090597
Blay JY, Gomez F, Sebban C, et al. The International Prognostic Index correlates to survival in patients with aggressive lymphoma in relapse: analysis of the PARMA trial. Blood. 1998;92:3562‐3568.
Hamlin PA, Zelenetz AD, Kewalramani T, et al. Age‐adjusted international prognostic index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood. 2003;102:1989‐1996. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-12-3837
Thieblemont C, Briere J, Mounier N, et al. The germinal center/activated B‐cell subclassification has a prognostic impact for response to salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: A Bio‐Coral Study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4079‐4087. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4423
Guglielmi C, Gomez F, Philip T, et al. Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the parma trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3264‐3269. doi:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3264
Martín A, Conde E, Arnan M, et al. R‐ESHAP as salvage therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: the influence of prior exposure to rituximab on outcome. A GEL/TAMO Study. Haematologica. 2008;93:1829‐1836. doi:10.3324/haematol.13440
Merli F, Luminari S, Tucci A, et al. Simplified geriatric assessment in older patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: the prospective elderly project of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1214‐1222. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.02465
Wildes TM, Augustin KM, Sempek D, et al. Comorbidities, not age, impact outcomes in autologous stem cell transplant for relapsed non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:840‐846. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.05.002
Mondello P, Steiner N, Willenbacher W, et al. Lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: is it a valid treatment option? Oncologist. 2016;21:1107‐1112. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0103
Broccoli A, Casadei B, Chiappella A, et al. Lenalidomide in pretreated patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: An Italian Observational Multicenter Retrospective Study in daily clinical practice. Oncologist. 2019;24:1246‐1252. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0603
Chihara D, Liao L, Tkacz J, et al. Real‐world experience of CAR T‐cell therapy in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood. 2023;142:1047‐1055. doi:10.1182/blood.2023020197
Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403:503‐511. doi:10.1038/35000501
Lenz G, Wright GW, Emre NCT, et al. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma arise by distinct genetic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:13520‐13525. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804295105
Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large‐B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1937‐1947. doi:10.1056/nejmoa012914