The validity of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for assessing aerobic capacity in neuromuscular diseases.

Maximal exercise test VO(2max) aerobic exercise cardiorespiratory fitness measurement properties neuromuscular disorders rehabilitation

Journal

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 30 12 2023
revised: 03 07 2024
accepted: 03 07 2024
medline: 22 7 2024
pubmed: 22 7 2024
entrez: 21 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the content validity of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for assessing peak oxygen uptake (VO Baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Academic hospital. Eighty-six adults (age: 58.0 ± 13.9 years) with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (n=35), post-polio syndrome (n=26), or other NMD (n=25). Not applicable. Workload, gas exchange variables, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion were measured during CPET on a cycle ergometer, supervised by an experienced trained assessor. Muscle strength of the knee extensors was assessed isometrically with a fixed dynamometer. Criteria for confirming maximal cardiorespiratory effort during CPET were established during 3 consensus meetings with an expert group. The percentage of participants meeting these criteria was assessed to quantify content validity. The following criteria were established for maximal cardiorespiratory effort; a plateau in oxygen uptake (VO Most people with NMD achieved maximal cardiorespiratory effort during CPET. Therewith, this study provides high quality evidence of sufficient content validity of VO

Identifiants

pubmed: 39033949
pii: S0003-9993(24)01124-9
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.07.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Auteurs

Tim Veneman (T)

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Fieke S Koopman (FS)

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sander Oorschot (S)

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jos J de Koning (JJ)

Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, The Netherlands.

Bart C Bongers (BC)

Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Institute for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, NUTRIM, Institute for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Frans Nollet (F)

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Eric L Voorn (EL)

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.l.voorn@amsterdamumc.nl.

Classifications MeSH