Short-term versus extended chemoprophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A retrospective study of 424 patients.

Breast cancer Breast reconstruction Cancer du sein Chemoprevention Hematoma Hématome Microchirurgie Microsurgery Reconstruction mammaire Thromboembolie veineuse anticoagulation Venous thromboembolism

Journal

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique
ISSN: 1768-319X
Titre abrégé: Ann Chir Plast Esthet
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8305839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 13 12 2023
revised: 06 07 2024
accepted: 09 07 2024
medline: 22 7 2024
pubmed: 22 7 2024
entrez: 21 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Autologous breast reconstruction is considered high-risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and thromboembolism (PE). It is therefore recommended to treat patients undergoing these complex and lengthy procedures with DVT chemoprophylaxis. The optimal anticoagulation protocol is still not established. The objective of our study was to evaluate the need of a prolonged anticoagulation in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction. This retrospective cohort study compares our former anticoagulation protocol, which was given during the in-hospital stay, with our new protocol consisting of extended anticoagulation until postoperative day 25, in terms of DVT/PE risk reduction. A logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk of DVT/PE between the two groups, while adjusting for several covariates. Our cohort consisted of 205 patients in the short-term anticoagulation group and 219 in the extended protocol group. Five patients (2.4%) in the short-term anticoagulation group had a DVT/PE event versus 4 patients (1.8%) in the extended protocol group. Logistic regression revealed no difference in the incidence of DVT/PE between the two groups. Similarly, there was no differences in terms of hematoma and infection rate between the two groups. Finally, we found an increased risk of DVT/PE in patients with a Caprini score equal or greater than 8. In our experience, short-term anticoagulation during the hospital stay is equivalent to extended thromboprophylaxis in terms of DVT/PE prevention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Autologous breast reconstruction is considered high-risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and thromboembolism (PE). It is therefore recommended to treat patients undergoing these complex and lengthy procedures with DVT chemoprophylaxis. The optimal anticoagulation protocol is still not established. The objective of our study was to evaluate the need of a prolonged anticoagulation in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective cohort study compares our former anticoagulation protocol, which was given during the in-hospital stay, with our new protocol consisting of extended anticoagulation until postoperative day 25, in terms of DVT/PE risk reduction. A logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk of DVT/PE between the two groups, while adjusting for several covariates.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our cohort consisted of 205 patients in the short-term anticoagulation group and 219 in the extended protocol group. Five patients (2.4%) in the short-term anticoagulation group had a DVT/PE event versus 4 patients (1.8%) in the extended protocol group. Logistic regression revealed no difference in the incidence of DVT/PE between the two groups. Similarly, there was no differences in terms of hematoma and infection rate between the two groups. Finally, we found an increased risk of DVT/PE in patients with a Caprini score equal or greater than 8.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In our experience, short-term anticoagulation during the hospital stay is equivalent to extended thromboprophylaxis in terms of DVT/PE prevention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39034221
pii: S0294-1260(24)00109-2
doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2024.07.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

C Awaida (C)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: cyril.awaida.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.

N Trabelsi (N)

University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

J Bou-Merhi (J)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

C Bernier (C)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A Gagnon (A)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

P Harris (P)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A Tchakmakian (A)

University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A Dragomir (A)

McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

A Odobescu (A)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH