Uterine displacement as fertility sparing technique for pelvic malignancies: Demonstration of the surgical options on a human cadaver.
Pelvic cancer
Radiotherapy
Uterine displacement
Uterine suspension
Uterine transposition
Uterine ventrofixation
Journal
Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
26
04
2024
revised:
09
06
2024
accepted:
16
06
2024
medline:
22
7
2024
pubmed:
22
7
2024
entrez:
22
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preservation of fertility without compromising oncological outcomes is a major objective in young patients at the time of cancer treatment (Azaïs et al., 2018, Bizzarri et al., 2022). Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (anus, rectum, sarcoma). Direct irradiation results in a damage to ovarian (Bizzarri et al., 2023) and endometrial function (Lohynska et al., 2021), compromising the fertility of female patients of reproductive age. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field (Morice et al., 2022, Pavone et al., 2023), corresponding surgical procedures displacing the uterus are investigational (Pavone et al., 2023, Querleu et al., 2010, Ribeiro et al., 2017, Ribeiro et al., 2024). In a human female cadaver model, the reported laparoscopic techniques of uterine displacement were carried out to demonstrate their feasibility and the step-by-step surgical techniques. The surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room which enables to perform CT-scan and evaluate the uterine positions according to anatomical landmarks. The following procedures were performed in the same cadaveric model and were described in the video: 1. Uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 2. Uterine ventrofixation of the fundus at the level of the umbilical line 3. Uterine transposition according to the technique reported by Ribeiro et al. All procedures were completed without technical complications. All of these uterine displacement procedures are technically feasible. Uterine transposition is the most technically complex procedure, and its effectiveness in protecting the endometrium should be evaluated in comparison to the simpler techniques (Table 1). Future studies incorporating radiotherapy simulations are needed to define which technique represents the best compromise between surgical complexity and positioning the uterus at a level that receives the lowest possible radiation dose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39035034
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101436
pii: S2352-5789(24)00115-2
pmc: PMC11259779
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101436Informations de copyright
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.