Uterine displacement as fertility sparing technique for pelvic malignancies: Demonstration of the surgical options on a human cadaver.

Pelvic cancer Radiotherapy Uterine displacement Uterine suspension Uterine transposition Uterine ventrofixation

Journal

Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 26 04 2024
revised: 09 06 2024
accepted: 16 06 2024
medline: 22 7 2024
pubmed: 22 7 2024
entrez: 22 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Preservation of fertility without compromising oncological outcomes is a major objective in young patients at the time of cancer treatment (Azaïs et al., 2018, Bizzarri et al., 2022). Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (anus, rectum, sarcoma). Direct irradiation results in a damage to ovarian (Bizzarri et al., 2023) and endometrial function (Lohynska et al., 2021), compromising the fertility of female patients of reproductive age. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field (Morice et al., 2022, Pavone et al., 2023), corresponding surgical procedures displacing the uterus are investigational (Pavone et al., 2023, Querleu et al., 2010, Ribeiro et al., 2017, Ribeiro et al., 2024). In a human female cadaver model, the reported laparoscopic techniques of uterine displacement were carried out to demonstrate their feasibility and the step-by-step surgical techniques. The surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room which enables to perform CT-scan and evaluate the uterine positions according to anatomical landmarks. The following procedures were performed in the same cadaveric model and were described in the video: 1. Uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 2. Uterine ventrofixation of the fundus at the level of the umbilical line 3. Uterine transposition according to the technique reported by Ribeiro et al. All procedures were completed without technical complications. All of these uterine displacement procedures are technically feasible. Uterine transposition is the most technically complex procedure, and its effectiveness in protecting the endometrium should be evaluated in comparison to the simpler techniques (Table 1). Future studies incorporating radiotherapy simulations are needed to define which technique represents the best compromise between surgical complexity and positioning the uterus at a level that receives the lowest possible radiation dose.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39035034
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101436
pii: S2352-5789(24)00115-2
pmc: PMC11259779
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101436

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Matteo Pavone (M)

Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
IRCAD, Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) France, Strasbourg, France.
UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Lise Lecointre (L)

Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
ICube UMR 7357-Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Barbara Seeliger (B)

Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
IRCAD, Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) France, Strasbourg, France.
ICube UMR 7357-Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Nicolò Bizzarri (N)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Jacques Marescaux (J)

IRCAD, Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) France, Strasbourg, France.

Giovanni Scambia (G)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Cherif Akladios (C)

Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Denis Querleu (D)

Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH