Trends in Black-White Differences of Antihypertensive Treatment in Individuals With and Without History of Stroke.
Humans
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Male
Female
Middle Aged
White People
Aged
Stroke
/ drug therapy
Hypertension
/ drug therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Black or African American
Black People
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ therapeutic use
antihypertensive agents
calcium channel blockers
hypertension
racial groups
stroke
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
22
7
2024
pubmed:
22
7
2024
entrez:
22
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent hypertension guidelines for the general population have included race-specific recommendations for antihypertensives, whereas current stroke-specific recommendations for antihypertensives do not vary by race. The impact of these guidelines on antihypertensive regimen changes over time, and if this has varied by prevalent stroke status, is unclear. The use of antihypertensive medications was studied cross-sectionally among self-identified Black and White participants, aged ≥45 years, with and without history of stroke, from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Participants completed an in-home examination in 2003-2007 (visit 1) with/without an examination in 2013-2016 (visit 2). Stratified by prevalent stroke status, logistic regression mixed models examined associations between antihypertensive class use for visit 2 versus visit 1 and Black versus White individuals with an interaction adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and vascular risk factors/vital signs. Of 17 244 stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had greater adjusted odds of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage than White participants (odds ratio [OR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.77]). This difference was smaller in the 7476 stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]). In stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of calcium channel blocker (CCB) usage than White participants (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]), but CCB usage did not differ significantly between Black and White stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09]). Among 1437 stroke survivor participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of CCB use than White participants (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.26-0.45]). In 689 stroke survivor participants at visit 2, CCB use did not differ between Black and White participants (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-1.06]). Racial differences in the use of guideline-recommended antihypertensives decreased between 2003-2007 and 2013-2016 in stroke-free individuals. In stroke survivors, racial differences in CCB usage narrowed over the time periods. These findings suggest there is still a mismatch between race-specific hypertension guidelines and recent clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
Recent hypertension guidelines for the general population have included race-specific recommendations for antihypertensives, whereas current stroke-specific recommendations for antihypertensives do not vary by race. The impact of these guidelines on antihypertensive regimen changes over time, and if this has varied by prevalent stroke status, is unclear.
METHODS
UNASSIGNED
The use of antihypertensive medications was studied cross-sectionally among self-identified Black and White participants, aged ≥45 years, with and without history of stroke, from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Participants completed an in-home examination in 2003-2007 (visit 1) with/without an examination in 2013-2016 (visit 2). Stratified by prevalent stroke status, logistic regression mixed models examined associations between antihypertensive class use for visit 2 versus visit 1 and Black versus White individuals with an interaction adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and vascular risk factors/vital signs.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
Of 17 244 stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had greater adjusted odds of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage than White participants (odds ratio [OR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.77]). This difference was smaller in the 7476 stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]). In stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of calcium channel blocker (CCB) usage than White participants (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]), but CCB usage did not differ significantly between Black and White stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09]). Among 1437 stroke survivor participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of CCB use than White participants (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.26-0.45]). In 689 stroke survivor participants at visit 2, CCB use did not differ between Black and White participants (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-1.06]).
CONCLUSIONS
UNASSIGNED
Racial differences in the use of guideline-recommended antihypertensives decreased between 2003-2007 and 2013-2016 in stroke-free individuals. In stroke survivors, racial differences in CCB usage narrowed over the time periods. These findings suggest there is still a mismatch between race-specific hypertension guidelines and recent clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39038094
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046877
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2034-2044Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Royan receives salary support as an Assistant Editor at JAMA Network Open. Dr Long receives grant/contract support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and Amgen, and reports employment by West Virginia University. Dr Levine receives grant/contract support from the National Institutes of Health and compensation from Northwestern University for consultant services. Dr Gorelick receives consultant support from AbbVie and End Point Review Committee support from Bausch Health US, LLC, ICON Pharma, LabCorp (aka Lab Corporation), Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Sanofi and Genzyme US Companies, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, and Union Chimique Belge (UCB). The other authors report no conflicts.