Measurement of Daily Actions Associated With Mental Health Using the Things You Do Questionnaire-15-Item: Questionnaire Development and Validation Study.

activities adult anxiety anxiety symptoms assessment confirmatory factor analysis daily actions depression depression symptoms digital digital psychology service goals habits healthy habits mental health plans psychology psychometric questionnaire survey treatment treatment-seeking

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 27 02 2024
accepted: 02 05 2024
revised: 25 04 2024
medline: 22 7 2024
pubmed: 22 7 2024
entrez: 22 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A large number of modifiable and measurable daily actions are thought to impact mental health. The "Things You Do" refers to 5 types of daily actions that have been associated with mental health: healthy thinking, meaningful activities, goals and plans, healthy habits, and social connections. Previous studies have reported the psychometric properties of the Things You Do Questionnaire (TYDQ)-21-item (TYDQ21). The 21-item version, however, has an uneven distribution of items across the 5 aforementioned factors and may be lengthy to administer on a regular basis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief version of the TYDQ. To accomplish this, we identified the top 10 and 15 items on the TYDQ21 and then evaluated the performance of the 10-item and 15-item versions of the TYDQ in community and treatment-seeking samples. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the top 2 or 3 items were used to develop the 10-item and 15-item versions, respectively. Model fit, reliability, and validity were examined for both versions in 2 samples: a survey of community adults (n=6070) and adults who completed an assessment at a digital psychology service (n=14,878). Treatment responsivity was examined in a subgroup of participants (n=448). Parallel analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the TYDQ. The brief (10-item and 15-item) versions were associated with better model fit than the 21-item version, as revealed by its comparative fit index, root-mean-square error of approximation, and Tucker-Lewis index. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance were supported. The 15-item version explained more variance in the 21-item scores than the 10-item version. Internal consistency was appropriate (eg, the 15-item version had a Cronbach α of >0.90 in both samples) and there were no marked differences between how the brief versions correlated with validated measures of depression or anxiety symptoms. The measure was responsive to treatment. The 15-item version is appropriate for use as a brief measure of daily actions associated with mental health while balancing brevity and clinical utility. Further research is encouraged to replicate our psychometric evaluation in other settings (eg, face-to-face services). Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000407796; https://tinyurl.com/2s67a6ps.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A large number of modifiable and measurable daily actions are thought to impact mental health. The "Things You Do" refers to 5 types of daily actions that have been associated with mental health: healthy thinking, meaningful activities, goals and plans, healthy habits, and social connections. Previous studies have reported the psychometric properties of the Things You Do Questionnaire (TYDQ)-21-item (TYDQ21). The 21-item version, however, has an uneven distribution of items across the 5 aforementioned factors and may be lengthy to administer on a regular basis.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief version of the TYDQ. To accomplish this, we identified the top 10 and 15 items on the TYDQ21 and then evaluated the performance of the 10-item and 15-item versions of the TYDQ in community and treatment-seeking samples.
METHODS METHODS
Using confirmatory factor analysis, the top 2 or 3 items were used to develop the 10-item and 15-item versions, respectively. Model fit, reliability, and validity were examined for both versions in 2 samples: a survey of community adults (n=6070) and adults who completed an assessment at a digital psychology service (n=14,878). Treatment responsivity was examined in a subgroup of participants (n=448).
RESULTS RESULTS
Parallel analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the TYDQ. The brief (10-item and 15-item) versions were associated with better model fit than the 21-item version, as revealed by its comparative fit index, root-mean-square error of approximation, and Tucker-Lewis index. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance were supported. The 15-item version explained more variance in the 21-item scores than the 10-item version. Internal consistency was appropriate (eg, the 15-item version had a Cronbach α of >0.90 in both samples) and there were no marked differences between how the brief versions correlated with validated measures of depression or anxiety symptoms. The measure was responsive to treatment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The 15-item version is appropriate for use as a brief measure of daily actions associated with mental health while balancing brevity and clinical utility. Further research is encouraged to replicate our psychometric evaluation in other settings (eg, face-to-face services).
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000407796; https://tinyurl.com/2s67a6ps.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39038286
pii: v8i1e57804
doi: 10.2196/57804
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e57804

Informations de copyright

©Madelyne A Bisby, Michael P Jones, Lauren Staples, Blake Dear, Nickolai Titov. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.07.2024.

Auteurs

Madelyne A Bisby (MA)

MindSpot Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

Michael P Jones (MP)

School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

Lauren Staples (L)

MindSpot Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

Blake Dear (B)

MindSpot Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

Nickolai Titov (N)

MindSpot Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

Classifications MeSH