EVALUATION OF ANTICANCER THERAPY- RELATED DERMATOLOGIC ADVERSE EVENTS: INSIGHTS FROM FDA's FAERS DATASET.

Anticancer drugs FAERS adverse events cutaneous toxicities skin

Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 03 04 2024
revised: 10 06 2024
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 23 7 2024
pubmed: 23 7 2024
entrez: 22 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

New anticancer therapies have improved patient outcomes but associated dermatologic adverse events (AEs) may cause morbidity and treatment discontinuation. A comprehensive estimation of associations between cancer drugs and skin AEs is lacking. This study utilized the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (January 2013-September 2022), with 3,399,830 reports involving 3,084 drugs and 16,348 AEs. A nearest neighbor matching model was employed to select 10 controls for each case report, utilizing the cosine similarity of demographic and AE severity factors to minimize false positives/ negatives. There were 10,698 unique anticancer drugs (n=212) to skin AE (n=873) pairs, of which 676 had significant Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) >1, comprising 113 drugs and 144 AEs. The minimum ROR was 1.25, and 50% of associations displayed a ROR >10. The most common were rash (51 agents) and dry skin (28 drugs). Methotrexate induced the most distinct AEs (34), then mechlorethamine (33), and vemurafenib (24). Targeted therapies accounted for 49% of pairs, cytotoxic chemotherapies for 35.9%, and immunotherapies for 11%. 113 anticancer drugs were identified as significantly associated with skin AEs, most frequently rash and dry skin. Data are likely underreported but enable quick post-marketing identification of skin toxicity signals.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
New anticancer therapies have improved patient outcomes but associated dermatologic adverse events (AEs) may cause morbidity and treatment discontinuation. A comprehensive estimation of associations between cancer drugs and skin AEs is lacking.
METHODS METHODS
This study utilized the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (January 2013-September 2022), with 3,399,830 reports involving 3,084 drugs and 16,348 AEs. A nearest neighbor matching model was employed to select 10 controls for each case report, utilizing the cosine similarity of demographic and AE severity factors to minimize false positives/ negatives.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 10,698 unique anticancer drugs (n=212) to skin AE (n=873) pairs, of which 676 had significant Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) >1, comprising 113 drugs and 144 AEs. The minimum ROR was 1.25, and 50% of associations displayed a ROR >10. The most common were rash (51 agents) and dry skin (28 drugs). Methotrexate induced the most distinct AEs (34), then mechlorethamine (33), and vemurafenib (24). Targeted therapies accounted for 49% of pairs, cytotoxic chemotherapies for 35.9%, and immunotherapies for 11%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
113 anticancer drugs were identified as significantly associated with skin AEs, most frequently rash and dry skin. Data are likely underreported but enable quick post-marketing identification of skin toxicity signals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39038557
pii: S0190-9622(24)02532-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.07.1456
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Samir Salah (S)

La Roche-Posay Laboratoire Dermatologique, Levallois Perret, France. Electronic address: samir.salah@loreal.com.

Delphine Kerob (D)

La Roche-Posay Laboratoire Dermatologique, Levallois Perret, France.

Cecile Pages Laurent (C)

Departments of Oncodermatology and Clinical Research, Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse Oncopole, France.

Mario Lacouture (M)

New York University Langone, New York, USA.

Vincent Sibaud (V)

Departments of Oncodermatology and Clinical Research, Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse Oncopole, France.

Classifications MeSH