Optimising the use of the prostate- specific antigen blood test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection in primary care: report from a UK clinical consensus.

consensus early detection of cancer primary health care prostate cancer prostate-specific antigen screening

Journal

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN: 1478-5242
Titre abrégé: Br J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 21 11 2023
accepted: 27 03 2024
medline: 23 7 2024
pubmed: 23 7 2024
entrez: 22 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Screening is not recommended for prostate cancer in the UK. Asymptomatic men aged ≥50 years can request a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test following counselling on potential harms and benefits. There are areas of clinical uncertainty among GPs, resulting in the content and quality of counselling varying. To produce a consensus that can influence guidelines for UK primary care on the optimal use of the PSA test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection. Prostate Cancer UK facilitated a RAND/UCLA consensus. Statements covering five topics were developed with a subgroup of experts. A panel of 15 experts in prostate cancer scored (round one) statements on a scale of one (strongly disagree) to nine (strongly agree). Panellists met to discuss statements before rescoring (round two). A lived experience panel of seven men scored a subset of statements with outcomes fed into the main panel. Of the initial 94 statements reviewed by the expert panel, a final 48/85 (56%) achieved consensus. In the absence of screening, there was consensus on proactive approaches to initiate discussions about the PSA test with men who were at higher-than-average risk. Improvements in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway may have reduced some of the harms associated with PSA testing; however, several areas of uncertainty remain in relation to screening, including optimal PSA thresholds for referral and intervals for retesting. There is consensus on proactive approaches to testing in higher-than-average risk groups. This should prompt a review of current guidelines.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Screening is not recommended for prostate cancer in the UK. Asymptomatic men aged ≥50 years can request a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test following counselling on potential harms and benefits. There are areas of clinical uncertainty among GPs, resulting in the content and quality of counselling varying.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To produce a consensus that can influence guidelines for UK primary care on the optimal use of the PSA test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection.
DESIGN AND SETTING METHODS
Prostate Cancer UK facilitated a RAND/UCLA consensus.
METHOD METHODS
Statements covering five topics were developed with a subgroup of experts. A panel of 15 experts in prostate cancer scored (round one) statements on a scale of one (strongly disagree) to nine (strongly agree). Panellists met to discuss statements before rescoring (round two). A lived experience panel of seven men scored a subset of statements with outcomes fed into the main panel.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the initial 94 statements reviewed by the expert panel, a final 48/85 (56%) achieved consensus. In the absence of screening, there was consensus on proactive approaches to initiate discussions about the PSA test with men who were at higher-than-average risk.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Improvements in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway may have reduced some of the harms associated with PSA testing; however, several areas of uncertainty remain in relation to screening, including optimal PSA thresholds for referral and intervals for retesting. There is consensus on proactive approaches to testing in higher-than-average risk groups. This should prompt a review of current guidelines.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39038964
pii: BJGP.2023.0586
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0586
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Authors.

Auteurs

Thomas A Harding (TA)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Richard M Martin (RM)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Samuel Wd Merriel (SW)

University of Manchester, Manchester.

Robert Jones (R)

School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

Joe M O'Sullivan (JM)

Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast.

Mike Kirby (M)

British Society for Sexual Medicine, Bygrave, Hertfordshire.

Oluwabunmi Olajide (O)

GP training programme director, Barking, Dagenham & Havering GP Vocational Training Scheme.

Alexander Norman (A)

Surrey and Sussex Cancer Alliance, Guildford.

Jaimin Bhatt (J)

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow; honorary clinical senior lecturer, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

Oliver Hulson (O)

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds.

Tanimola Martins (T)

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.

Vincent J Gnanapragasam (VJ)

University of Cambridge; honorary consultant urologist, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.

Jonathan Aning (J)

Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust and Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Meg Burgess (M)

Prostate Cancer UK, London.

Derek J Rosario (DJ)

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield.

Nora Pashayan (N)

Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; honorary professor of applied cancer research, Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London.

Abel Tesfai (A)

Prostate Cancer UK, London.

Amy Rylance (A)

Prostate Cancer UK, London.

Classifications MeSH