Supportive care interventions in metastatic bone disease: scoping review.

Bone Fatigue Pain Palliative Care Spiritual care Supportive care

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
accepted: 21 05 2024
medline: 23 7 2024
pubmed: 23 7 2024
entrez: 22 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research. We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design. After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong. Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research.
METHODS METHODS
We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design.
RESULTS RESULTS
After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39038991
pii: spcare-2024-004965
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004965
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AF is supported in part by the UC Davis Paul Calabresi Career Development Program for Clinical Oncology funded by the National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health (5K12-CA138464).

Auteurs

Samuel K Simister (SK)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Rahul Bhale (R)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Amy M Cizik (AM)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Barton L Wise (BL)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Department or Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Steven W Thorpe (SW)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Betty Ferrell (B)

Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.

R Lor Randall (RL)

Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Alex Fauer (A)

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA ajfauer@ucdavis.edu.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH