Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Recurrence and Survival Following Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6 Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 23 7 2024
pubmed: 23 7 2024
entrez: 23 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study investigated the correlation between positive resection margins and outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pivotal trial PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6. The primary focus is on elucidating the prognostic significance of specific resection margins, including those associated with the superior-mesenteric vein (SMV), medial, and posterior pancreas. The analysis involved 400 patients across multiple centers in France and Canada. Surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy were core interventions. This study assessed the prognostic impact of resection margins, highlighting the significance of standardized pathology assessments. Additionally, the influence of chemotherapy regimen choice, comparing gemcitabine to mFOLFIRINOX, on the implications of positive resection margins was examined. Only three margins, SMV (HR=1.48 95% CI [1.11;1.96], P<.001), medial (HR=1.92 95% CI [1.36;2.73], P<.001) and posterior (HR=1.65 95% CI [1.21;2.24], P=.002), had a significant prognostic impact on disease-free survival and were sufficient compared with the seven recommended margins (Kappa=0.90 95% CI [0.87; 0.94]). R1 status was significant independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in gemcitabine-treasted patients (HR=1.97 95% CI [1.23;3.16], P=.005) but lost its significance with mFOLFIRINOX (HR=1.46 95% CI [0.91;2.35], P=.114). All efforts should be made to evaluate the three margins of the highest prognostic value, with the others being secondary. A key finding of this study is the likely effect of mFOLFIRINOX on local invasion in operated patients, which seems to correct the impairment related to margin involvement, probably explaining the improvements in DFS and OS.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study investigated the correlation between positive resection margins and outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pivotal trial PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The primary focus is on elucidating the prognostic significance of specific resection margins, including those associated with the superior-mesenteric vein (SMV), medial, and posterior pancreas.
METHODS METHODS
The analysis involved 400 patients across multiple centers in France and Canada. Surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy were core interventions. This study assessed the prognostic impact of resection margins, highlighting the significance of standardized pathology assessments. Additionally, the influence of chemotherapy regimen choice, comparing gemcitabine to mFOLFIRINOX, on the implications of positive resection margins was examined.
RESULTS RESULTS
Only three margins, SMV (HR=1.48 95% CI [1.11;1.96], P<.001), medial (HR=1.92 95% CI [1.36;2.73], P<.001) and posterior (HR=1.65 95% CI [1.21;2.24], P=.002), had a significant prognostic impact on disease-free survival and were sufficient compared with the seven recommended margins (Kappa=0.90 95% CI [0.87; 0.94]). R1 status was significant independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in gemcitabine-treasted patients (HR=1.97 95% CI [1.23;3.16], P=.005) but lost its significance with mFOLFIRINOX (HR=1.46 95% CI [0.91;2.35], P=.114).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
All efforts should be made to evaluate the three margins of the highest prognostic value, with the others being secondary. A key finding of this study is the likely effect of mFOLFIRINOX on local invasion in operated patients, which seems to correct the impairment related to margin involvement, probably explaining the improvements in DFS and OS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39041211
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006449
pii: 00000658-990000000-00992
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no conflict of interest regarding the subject of this work.

Auteurs

Aurélien Lambert (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and INSERM, UMR 1319 INSPIIRE, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Julia Salleron (J)

Biostatistic Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Alexandre Harlé (A)

Service de Biologie Moléculaire des Tumeurs, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN-Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

James J Biagi (JJ)

Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Canada.

Agnès Leroux (A)

Department of Biopathology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Jacques Thomas (J)

Department of Biopathology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Laure Monard (L)

R&D UNICANCER, Paris, France.

Jérôme Cros (J)

Department of Pathology, Hopital Beaujon - Université de Paris, INSERM U1149, Clichy, France.

Frédéric Marchal (F)

Departement of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Ahmet Ayav (A)

Department of Hepatobiliary, Colorectal, and Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Thierry Conroy (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and INSERM, UMR 1319 INSPIIRE, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Classifications MeSH