Evaluating stereotactic accuracy with patient-specific MRI distortion corrections for frame-based radiosurgery.
MRI
SRS
distortions
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2024
23 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
15
04
2024
received:
25
10
2023
accepted:
15
06
2024
medline:
23
7
2024
pubmed:
23
7
2024
entrez:
23
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study examines how MRI distortions affect frame-based SRS treatments and assesses the need for clinical distortion corrections. The study included 18 patients with 80 total brain targets treated using frame-based radiosurgery. Distortion within patients' MRIs were corrected using Cranial Distortion Correction (CDC) software, which utilizes the patient's CT to alter planning MRIs to reduce inherent intra-cranial distortion. Distortion was evaluated by comparing the original planning target volumes (PTV PTV MRIs used for SRS target delineation exhibit notable geometric distortions that may compromise optimal dosimetric accuracy. A uniform 1 mm expansion may result in geometric misses; however, the CDC algorithm provides a feasible solution for rectifying distortions, thereby enhancing treatment precision.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14472Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Schmidt MA, Payne GS. Radiotherapy planning using MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(22):R323‐R32361. doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/60/22/R323
Hanssens P, Karlsson B, Yeo TT, Chou N, Beute G. Detection of brain micrometastases by high‐resolution stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on the timing of and risk for distant recurrences. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(3):499‐504. doi: 10.3171/2011.4.JNS101832
Khoo VS, Dearnaley DP, Finnigan DJ, Padhani A, Tanner SF, Leach MO. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 1997;42(1):1‐15. doi: 10.1016/s0167‐8140(96)01866‐x
Wang D, Doddrell DM. Geometric distortion in structural magnetic resonance imaging. Current Medical Imaging. 2005;1(1):49‐60.
Weygand J, Fuller CD, Ibbott GS, et al. Spatial precision in magnetic resonance imaging‐guided radiation therapy: the role of geometric distortion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(4):1304‐1316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.059
Walker A, Liney G, Metcalfe P, Holloway L. MRI distortion: considerations for MRI based radiotherapy treatment planning. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2014;37(1):103‐113. doi: 10.1007/s13246‐014‐0252‐2
Alzahrani M, Broadbent DA, Chuter R, et al. Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:80‐84. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004
Moutsatsos A, Karaiskos P, Petrokokkinos L, et al. Assessment and characterization of the total geometric uncertainty in Gamma Knife radiosurgery using polymer gels. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031704. doi: 10.1118/1.4789922
Wang H, Balter J, Cao Y. Patient‐induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(3):465‐477. doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/58/3/465
Seibert TM, White NS, Kim GY, et al. Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(6):e319‐e328. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.05.008
Karaiskos P, Moutsatsos A, Pappas E, et al. A simple and efficient methodology to improve geometric accuracy in gamma knife radiation surgery: implementation in multiple brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(5):1234‐1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.349
Brezovich IA, Wu X, Duan J, et al. End‐to‐end test of spatial accuracy in Gamma Knife treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. Med Phys. 2014;41(11):111703. doi: 10.1118/1.4896819
Dorenlot A, Champoudry J. End‐to‐end tests of the new Elekta gamma knife ICON. Physica Medica: Eur J Med Phys. 2016;32:353. 25.
Pappas EP, Alshanqity M, Moutsatsos A, et al. MRI‐related geometric distortions in stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning: evaluation and dosimetric impact. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16(6):1120‐1129. doi: 10.1177/1533034617735454
Jacobson S, Jones C, Lusk R, et al. Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging distortions on gamma knife radiosurgery. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68(3):274‐281. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.472
Retif P, Djibo Sidikou A, Mathis C, et al. Evaluation of the ability of the Brainlab elements cranial distortion correction algorithm to correct clinically relevant MRI distortions for cranial SRT. Strahlenther Onkol. 2022;198(10):907‐918. doi: 10.1007/s00066‐022‐01988‐1
Jackson E, Bronskill M, Drost D, et al. Acceptance testing andquality assurance procedures for magnetic resonance imagingfacilities. MD: College Park; 2010.
Chen CC, Wan YL, Wai YY, Liu HL. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17(4):279‐284. doi: 10.1007/s10278‐004‐1023‐5
Zeverino M, Jaccard M, Patin D, et al. Commissioning of the Leksell Gamma Knife((R)) icon. Med Phys. 2017;44(2):355‐363. doi: 10.1002/mp.12052
Hiepe P, Cranial distortion correction—Technical background. 2017. Accessed July 21, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317359164_Cranial_Distortion_Correction_‐_Technical_Background?channel=doi&linkId=593694aeaca272fc55739a28&showFulltext=true
Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26(3):297‐302.
Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1901;37:547‐579.
Student. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika. 1908;6(1):1‐25.
Sneed PK, Lamborn KR, Forstner JM, et al. Radiosurgery for brain metastases: is whole brain radiotherapy necessary? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43(3):549‐558. doi: 10.1016/s0360‐3016(98)00447‐7
Ilyas A, Chen CJ, Abecassis IJ, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for a randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations‐eligible patients: a meta‐analysis. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(5):684‐692. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002115
Kondziolka D, Zorro O, Lobato‐Polo J, et al. Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):758‐765. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS09694
Amaral T, Kiecker F, Schaefer S, et al. Combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without local therapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a DeCOG* study in 380 patients. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000333. doi: 10.1136/jitc‐2019‐000333
Lu SL, Xiao FR, Cheng JC, et al. Randomized multi‐reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(9):1560‐1568. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab071
Stanley J, Dunscombe P, Lau H, et al. The effect of contouring variability on dosimetric parameters for brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(5):924‐931. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.013
Yamazaki H, Shiomi H, Tsubokura T, et al. Quantitative assessment of inter‐observer variability in target volume delineation on stereotactic radiotherapy treatment for pituitary adenoma and meningioma near optic tract. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1748‐717X‐6‐10
Growcott S, Dembrey T, Patel R, Eaton D, Cameron A. Inter‐Observer variability in target volume delineations of benign and metastatic brain tumours for stereotactic radiosurgery: results of a national quality assurance programme. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020;32(1):13‐25. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.015
Ohira S, Suzuki Y, Washio H, et al. Impact of magnetic resonance imaging‐related geometric distortion of dose distribution in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024;200(1):39‐48. doi: 10.1007/s00066‐023‐02120‐7
Calvo‐Ortega JF, Mateos J, Alberich A, et al. Evaluation of a novel software application for magnetic resonance distortion correction in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Dosim. 2019;44(2):136‐143. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.04.002
Pappas EP, Seimenis I, Moutsatsos A, Georgiou E, Nomikos P, Karaiskos P. Characterization of system‐related geometric distortions in MR images employed in Gamma Knife radiosurgery applications. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(19):6993‐7011. doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/61/19/6993
Glide‐Hurst CK, Paulson ES, McGee K, et al. Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance. Med Phys. 2021;48(7):e636‐e670. doi: 10.1002/mp.14695
Lu L, Yang X, Raterman B, et al. Assessment of MRI image distortion based on 6 consecutive years of annual QAs and measurements on 14 MRI scanners used for radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(1):e13843. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13843
Hsu SH, Cao Y, Huang K, Feng M, Balter JM. Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(23):8419‐8435. doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/58/23/8419