Multiomic profiling of medulloblastoma reveals subtype-specific targetable alterations at the proteome and N-glycan level.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jul 2024
24 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
09
02
2023
accepted:
11
07
2024
medline:
24
7
2024
pubmed:
24
7
2024
entrez:
23
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medulloblastomas (MBs) are malignant pediatric brain tumors that are molecularly and clinically heterogenous. The application of omics technologies-mainly studying nucleic acids-has significantly improved MB classification and stratification, but treatment options are still unsatisfactory. The proteome and their N-glycans hold the potential to discover clinically relevant phenotypes and targetable pathways. We compile a harmonized proteome dataset of 167 MBs and integrate findings with DNA methylome, transcriptome and N-glycome data. We show six proteome MB subtypes, that can be assigned to two main molecular programs: transcription/translation (pSHHt, pWNT and pG3myc), and synapses/immunological processes (pSHHs, pG3 and pG4). Multiomic analysis reveals different conservation levels of proteome features across MB subtypes at the DNA methylome level. Aggressive pGroup3myc MBs and favorable pWNT MBs are most similar in cluster hierarchies concerning overall proteome patterns but show different protein abundances of the vincristine resistance-associated multiprotein complex TriC/CCT and of N-glycan turnover-associated factors. The N-glycome reflects proteome subtypes and complex-bisecting N-glycans characterize pGroup3myc tumors. Our results shed light on targetable alterations in MB and set a foundation for potential immunotherapies targeting glycan structures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39043693
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50554-z
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-50554-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polysaccharides
0
Proteome
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6237Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 416054672
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Louis, D. N. et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 23, 1231–1251 (2021).
pubmed: 34185076
pmcid: 8328013
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106
Taylor, M. D. et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 123, 465–472 (2012).
pubmed: 22134537
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z
Schwalbe, E. C. et al. Novel molecular subgroups for clinical classification and outcome prediction in childhood medulloblastoma: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 18, 958–971 (2017).
pubmed: 28545823
pmcid: 5489698
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30243-7
Hovestadt, V. et al. Medulloblastomics revisited: biological and clinical insights from thousands of patients. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 42–56 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0223-8
Cavalli, F. M. G. et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 31, 737–754.e6 (2017).
pubmed: 28609654
pmcid: 6163053
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.005
Northcott, P. A. et al. The whole-genome landscape of medulloblastoma subtypes. Nature 547, 311–317 (2017).
pubmed: 28726821
pmcid: 5905700
doi: 10.1038/nature22973
Louis, D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131, 803–820 (2016).
pubmed: 27157931
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Delaidelli, A. et al. Clinically Tractable Outcome Prediction of Non-WNT/Non-SHH Medulloblastoma Based on TPD52 IHC in a Multicohort Study. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 116–128 (2022).
pubmed: 34702771
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2057
McCabe, M. G., Bäcklund, L. M., Leong, H. S., Ichimura, K. & Collins, V. P. Chromosome 17 alterations identify good-risk and poor-risk tumors independently of clinical factors in medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 13, 376–383 (2011).
pubmed: 21292688
pmcid: 3064691
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq192
Ramaswamy, V. et al. Risk stratification of childhood medulloblastoma in the molecular era: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 821–831 (2016).
pubmed: 27040285
pmcid: 4867119
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1569-6
Goschzik, T. et al. Genetic alterations of TP53 and OTX2 indicate increased risk of relapse in WNT medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. 144, 1143–1156 (2022).
pubmed: 36181537
pmcid: 9637613
doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02505-5
Gajjar, A. et al. Outcomes by clinical and molecular features in children with medulloblastoma treated with risk-adapted therapy: results of an international phase III trial (SJMB03). J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 822–835 (2021).
pubmed: 33405951
pmcid: 10166353
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01372
Goschzik, T. et al. Molecular stratification of medulloblastoma: comparison of histological and genetic methods to detect Wnt activated tumours. Neuropathol. Appl Neurobiol. 41, 135–144 (2015).
pubmed: 24894640
doi: 10.1111/nan.12161
Ellison, D. W. et al. β-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 7951–7957 (2005).
pubmed: 16258095
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5479
Petralia, F. et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization across major histological types of pediatric brain cancer. Cell 183, 1962–1985.e31 (2020).
pubmed: 33242424
pmcid: 8143193
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.044
Archer, T. C. et al. Proteomics, post-translational modifications, and integrative analyses reveal molecular heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 34, 396–410.e8 (2018).
pubmed: 30205044
pmcid: 6372116
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.004
Forget, A. et al. Aberrant ERBB4-SRC signaling as a hallmark of group 4 medulloblastoma revealed by integrative phosphoproteomic profiling. Cancer Cell 34, 379–395.e7 (2018).
pubmed: 30205043
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.002
Magdeldin, S. & Yamamoto, T. Toward deciphering proteomes of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Proteomics 12, 1045–1058 (2012).
pubmed: 22318899
pmcid: 3561704
doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100550
Chen, Q., Tan, Z., Guan, F. & Ren, Y. The Essential Functions and Detection of Bisecting GlcNAc in Cell Biology. Front. Chem. 8, 511 (2020).
pubmed: 32719771
pmcid: 7350706
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00511
Vreeker, G. C. M. et al. Serum N-glycan profiles differ for various breast cancer subtypes. Glycoconj. J. 38, 387–395 (2021).
pubmed: 33877489
pmcid: 8116229
doi: 10.1007/s10719-021-10001-3
RodrÍguez, E., Schetters, S. T. T. & van Kooyk, Y. The tumour glyco-code as a novel immune checkpoint for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 204–211 (2018).
pubmed: 29398707
doi: 10.1038/nri.2018.3
Dotz, V. & Wuhrer, M. N-glycome signatures in human plasma: associations with physiology and major diseases. FEBS Lett. 593, 2966–2976 (2019).
pubmed: 31509238
doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13598
Kailemia, M. J., Park, D. & Lebrilla, C. B. Glycans and glycoproteins as specific biomarkers for cancer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 409, 395–410 (2017).
pubmed: 27590322
doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9880-6
Capper, D. et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555, 469–474 (2018).
pubmed: 29539639
pmcid: 6093218
doi: 10.1038/nature26000
Lee, H. G. et al. State-of-the-art housekeeping proteins for quantitative western blotting: revisiting the first draft of the human proteome. Proteomics 16, 1863–1867 (2016).
pubmed: 27125885
doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500344
Voß, H. et al. HarmonizR enables data harmonization across independent proteomic datasets with appropriate handling of missing values. Nat. Commun. 13, 3523 (2022).
pubmed: 35725563
pmcid: 9209422
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31007-x
Ellison, D. W. et al. Medulloblastoma: clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups. Acta Neuropathol. 121, 381–396 (2011).
pubmed: 21267586
pmcid: 3519926
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0800-8
Menyhárt, O. & Győrffy, B. Principles of tumorigenesis and emerging molecular drivers of SHH-activated medulloblastomas. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 6, 990–1005 (2019).
pubmed: 31139698
pmcid: 6529984
doi: 10.1002/acn3.762
Waszak, S. M. et al. Germline Elongator mutations in Sonic Hedgehog medulloblastoma. Nature 580, 396–401 (2020).
pubmed: 32296180
pmcid: 7430762
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2164-5
Krämer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. J. & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530 (2014).
pubmed: 24336805
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703
Rohart, F., Gautier, B., Singh, A. & Lê Cao, K.-A. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005752 (2017).
pubmed: 29099853
pmcid: 5687754
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752
Kool, M. et al. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell 25, 393–405 (2014).
pubmed: 24651015
pmcid: 4493053
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.004
Ramaswamy, V., Nör, C. & Taylor, M. D. P53 and meduloblastoma. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, 1–9 (2016).
Bailey, S. et al. Clinical trials in high-risk medulloblastoma: evolution of the SIOP-Europe HR-MB Trial. Cancers 14, 374 (2022).
pubmed: 35053536
pmcid: 8773789
doi: 10.3390/cancers14020374
Northcott, P. A. et al. Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1408–1414 (2011).
pubmed: 20823417
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4324
Menyhárt, O., Giangaspero, F. & Gyorffy, B. Molecular markers and potential therapeutic targets in non-WNT/non-SHH (group 3 and group 4) medulloblastomas. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 29 (2019).
pubmed: 30876441
pmcid: 6420757
doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0712-y
Sun, R., Kim, A. M. J. & Lim, S.-O. Glycosylation of immune receptors in cancer. Cells 10, 1100 (2021).
pubmed: 34064396
pmcid: 8147841
doi: 10.3390/cells10051100
Klein, J. A., Meng, L. & Zaia, J. Deep sequencing of complex proteoglycans: a novel strategy for high coverage and site-specific identification of glycosaminoglycan-linked peptides. Mol. Cell Proteom. 17, 1578–1590 (2018).
doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000766
Munkley, J. & Scott, E. Targeting aberrant sialylation to treat cancer. Medicines 6, 102 (2019).
pubmed: 31614918
pmcid: 6963943
doi: 10.3390/medicines6040102
Gustafsson, O. J. R., Arentz, G. & Hoffmann, P. Proteomic developments in the analysis of formalin-fixed tissue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 1854, 559–580 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.10.003
Sprung, R. W. et al. Equivalence of protein inventories obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and frozen tissue in multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomic analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 8, 1988–1998 (2009).
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800518-MCP200
Juric, V. & Murphy, B. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in brain cancer: current state and future directions. Cancer Drug Resist. 3, 48–62 (2020).
pubmed: 35582046
pmcid: 9094053
Ding, L. et al. The roles of cyclin-dependent kinases in cell-cycle progression and therapeutic strategies in human breast cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1960 (2020).
pubmed: 32183020
pmcid: 7139603
doi: 10.3390/ijms21061960
Brown, P. D. et al. Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neuro Oncol. 15, 1429–1437 (2013).
pubmed: 23956241
pmcid: 3779047
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not114
Cook Sangar, M. L. et al. Inhibition of CDK4/6 by palbociclib significantly extends survival in medulloblastoma patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 5802–5813 (2017).
pubmed: 28637687
pmcid: 6939669
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2943
Vasaikar, S. et al. Proteogenomic analysis of human colon cancer reveals new therapeutic opportunities. Cell 177, 1035–1049.e19 (2019).
pubmed: 31031003
pmcid: 6768830
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.030
Mertins, P. et al. Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1632–1661 (2018).
pubmed: 29988108
pmcid: 6211289
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0006-9
Hovestadt, V. et al. Decoding the regulatory landscape of medulloblastoma using DNA methylation sequencing. Nature 510, 537–541 (2014).
pubmed: 24847876
doi: 10.1038/nature13268
Clifford, S. C. et al. Wnt/Wingless pathway activation and chromosome 6 loss characterize a distinct molecular sub-group of medulloblastomas associated with a favorable prognosis. Cell Cycle 5, 2666–2670 (2006).
pubmed: 17172831
doi: 10.4161/cc.5.22.3446
Richard W. Olsen and Timothy M. DeLorey. Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. 6th edition (Lippincott-Raven, 1999).
Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 573, 539–545 (2019).
pubmed: 31534222
pmcid: 7038898
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1563-y
Venkataramani, V. et al. Glioblastoma hijacks neuronal mechanisms for brain invasion. Cell 185, 2899–2917.e31 (2022).
pubmed: 35914528
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.054
Akar, S., Harmankaya, İ., Uğraş, S. & Çelik, Ç. Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase expression and its association with phospho-Akt, p53 expression, and survival in high-grade endometrial cancer. Turk. J. Med Sci. 49, 1547–1554 (2019).
pubmed: 31652035
pmcid: 7018241
doi: 10.3906/sag-1907-166
Moore, S. et al. The CHD6 chromatin remodeler is an oxidative DNA damage response factor. Nat. Commun. 10, 241 (2019).
pubmed: 30651562
pmcid: 6335469
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08111-y
Alexiou, G. A. et al. Expression of heat shock proteins in medulloblastoma: Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 12, 452–457 (2013).
pubmed: 23992239
doi: 10.3171/2013.7.PEDS1376
Nobre, L. et al. Pattern of relapse and treatment response in WNT-activated medulloblastoma. Cell Rep. Med. 1, 100038 (2020).
pubmed: 32743560
pmcid: 7394286
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100038
Meredith, D. M. & Alexandrescu, S. Embryonal and non-meningothelial mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system—advances in diagnosis and prognostication. Brain Pathol. 32, e13059 (2022).
pubmed: 35266242
pmcid: 9245947
doi: 10.1111/bpa.13059
D’Arcy, C. E. et al. Immunohistochemical and nanostring-based subgrouping of clinical medulloblastoma samples. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 79, 437–447 (2020).
pubmed: 32053195
doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlaa005
Northcott, P. A. et al. Rapid, reliable, and reproducible molecular sub-grouping of clinical medulloblastoma samples. Acta Neuropathol. 123, 615–626 (2012).
pubmed: 22057785
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0899-7
Yoshida, T., Akatsuka, T. & Imanaka-Yoshida, K. Tenascin-C and integrins in cancer. Cell Adhes. Migr. 9, 96–104 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1008332
Linke, F. et al. 3D hydrogels reveal medulloblastoma subgroup differences and identify extracellular matrix subtypes that predict patient outcome. J. Pathol. 253, 326–338 (2021).
pubmed: 33206391
doi: 10.1002/path.5591
Phoenix, T. N. et al. Medulloblastoma genotype dictates blood brain barrier phenotype. Cancer Cell 29, 508–522 (2016).
pubmed: 27050100
pmcid: 4829447
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.002
Fujimoto, M. et al. Deficiency of tenascin-C and attenuation of blood-brain barrier disruption following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in mice. J. Neurosurg. 124, 1693–1702 (2016).
pubmed: 26473781
doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15484
Bai, R.-Y., Staedtke, V., Rudin, C. M., Bunz, F. & Riggins, G. J. Effective treatment of diverse medulloblastoma models with mebendazole and its impact on tumor angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol. 17, 545–554 (2015).
pubmed: 25253417
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou234
Shalabi, H., Nellan, A., Shah, N. N. & Gust, J. Immunotherapy associated neurotoxicity in pediatric oncology. Front. Oncol. 12, 836452 (2022).
pubmed: 35265526
pmcid: 8899040
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836452
Schwalbe, E. C. et al. Rapid diagnosis of medulloblastoma molecular subgroups. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 1883–1894 (2011).
pubmed: 21325292
pmcid: 3071325
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2210
Wang, J. et al. Effective inhibition of MYC-amplified group 3 medulloblastoma by FACT-targeted curaxin drug CBL0137. Cell Death Dis. 11, 1029 (2020).
pubmed: 33268769
pmcid: 7710710
doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03201-6
Patil, S. et al. Combination of clotam and vincristine enhances anti-proliferative effect in medulloblastoma cells. Gene 705, 67–76 (2019).
pubmed: 30991098
pmcid: 6594553
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.04.037
Sengupta, S., Pomeranz Krummel, D. & Pomeroy, S. The evolution of medulloblastoma therapy to personalized medicine. F1000Research 6, 490 (2017).
pubmed: 28713553
pmcid: 5490254
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10859.1
Bassiouni, R. et al. Chaperonin containing TCP-1 protein level in breast cancer cells predicts therapeutic application of a cytotoxic peptide. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4366–4379 (2016).
pubmed: 27012814
pmcid: 5010522
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2502
Carr, A. C. et al. Targeting chaperonin containing TCP1 (CCT) as a molecular therapeutic for small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 8, 110273–110288 (2017).
pubmed: 29299146
pmcid: 5746381
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22681
Ohtsubo, K. & Marth, J. D. Glycosylation in cellular mechanisms of health and disease. Cell 126, 855–867 (2006).
pubmed: 16959566
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.019
Greco, B. et al. Disrupting N-glycan expression on tumor cells boosts chimeric antigen receptor T cell efficacy against solid malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabg3072 (2022).
pubmed: 35044789
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg3072
Thurin, M. Tumor-associated glycans as targets for immunotherapy: the Wistar institute experience/legacy. Monoclon. Antib. Immunodiagn. Immunother. 40, 89–100 (2021).
pubmed: 34161162
pmcid: 8336226
doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0024
Marada, S. et al. Functional divergence in the role of N-linked glycosylation in smoothened signaling. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005473 (2015).
pubmed: 26291458
pmcid: 4546403
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005473
Williams, S. E. et al. Mammalian brain glycoproteins exhibit diminished glycan complexity compared to other tissues. Nat. Commun. 13, 275 (2022).
pubmed: 35022400
pmcid: 8755730
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27781-9
Rodrigues, E. & Macauley, M. S. Hypersialylation in cancer: modulation of inflammation and therapeutic opportunities. Cancers 10, 207 (2018).
pubmed: 29912148
pmcid: 6025361
doi: 10.3390/cancers10060207
Sharma, T. et al. Second-generation molecular subgrouping of medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis of Group 3 and Group 4 subtypes. Acta Neuropathol. 138, 309–326 (2019).
pubmed: 31076851
pmcid: 6660496
doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-02020-0
Mcalister, G. C. et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150–7158 (2014).
pubmed: 24927332
pmcid: 4215866
doi: 10.1021/ac502040v
Hughes, C. S. et al. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. Nat. Protoc. 14, 68–85 (2019).
pubmed: 30464214
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x
van Pijkeren, A. et al. Proteome coverage after simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid-liquid extraction. J. Proteome Res. 22, 951–966 (2023).
pubmed: 36763818
pmcid: 9990123
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00758
Yurekten, O. et al. MetaboLights: open data repository for metabolomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D640–D646 (2024).
pubmed: 37971328
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1045
Guan, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, J. & Schlüter, H. Comparative analysis of different n-glycan preparation approaches and development of optimized solid-phase permethylation using mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2914–2922 (2021).
pubmed: 33829797
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00135
Watanabe, Y., Aoki-Kinoshita, K. F., Ishihama, Y. & Okuda, S. GlycoPOST realizes FAIR principles for glycomics mass spectrometry data. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1523–D1528 (2021).
pubmed: 33174597
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1012
Aryee, M. J. et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30, 1363–1369 (2014).
pubmed: 24478339
pmcid: 4016708
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049
Ritchie, M. E. et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792
pmcid: 4402510
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2301–2319 (2016).
pubmed: 27809316
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).
pubmed: 31768060
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x
Guan, Y. et al. An integrated strategy reveals complex glycosylation of erythropoietin using mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 20, 3654–3663 (2021).
pubmed: 34110173
pmcid: 9472269
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00221
Community, T. G. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W345–W351 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac247
Triche, T. J. J., Weisenberger, D. J., Van Den Berg, D., Laird, P. W. & Siegmund, K. D. Low-level processing of illumina infinium DNA methylation beadarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e90 (2013).
pubmed: 23476028
pmcid: 3627582
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt090
Lagnoux, A., Mercier, S. & Vallois, P. Statistical significance based on length and position of the local score in a model of i.i.d. sequences. Bioinformatics 33, 654–660 (2017).
pubmed: 28035025
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw699
Tyanova, S. & Cox, J. Perseus: a bioinformatics platform for integrative analysis of proteomics data in cancer research. Methods Mol. Biol. 1711, 133–148 (2018).
pubmed: 29344888
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_7
Schumann, Y., Neumann, J. E. & Neumann, P. Robust classification using average correlations as features (ACF). BMC Bioinform. 24, 101 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05224-0
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).
pubmed: 27207943
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313
Wilkerson, M. D. & Hayes, D. N. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics 26, 1572–1573 (2010).
pubmed: 20427518
pmcid: 2881355
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq170
Jassal, B. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D498–D503 (2020).
pubmed: 31691815
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Reimand, J. et al. Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g:Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap. Nat. Protoc. 14, 482–517 (2019).
pubmed: 30664679
pmcid: 6607905
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0103-9
Paul Shannon, 1 et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models. Genome Res. 13, 426 (1971).
Franch-Expósito, S. et al. CNApp, a tool for the quantification of copy number alterations and integrative analysis revealing clinical implications. Elife 9, e50267 (2020).
pubmed: 31939734
pmcid: 7010409
doi: 10.7554/eLife.50267
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019