Use of autologous tooth-derived material as a graft in the post-extraction socket. Split-mouth study with radiological and histological analysis.
Alveolar preservation
Autologous dentin graft
Dentin
Dimensional changes
Histology
Post-extraction socket
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2024
23 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
06
02
2024
accepted:
04
07
2024
medline:
24
7
2024
pubmed:
24
7
2024
entrez:
23
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The healing process after tooth removal involves bone remodelling which implies some loss of alveolar bone volume. Among materials proposed for minimising this remodelling and preserving the bone, autologous dental tissue is a promising option, but more data are needed. In this context, we evaluated size and density changes using cone beam computed tomography in autologous dental material (ADM)-preserved sockets compared to controls, and assessed biological responses by histological analysis. A split-mouth study was conducted including 22 patients, who underwent removal of ≥ 2 single-rooted teeth with intact sockets, assigning one socket to the experimental group which received ADM for alveolar preservation and another to the control group, which only underwent blood clot stabilisation. Cone beam computed tomography was performed postoperatively (week 0) and at weeks 8 and 16 to assess socket size and bone density. Histological analysis was carried out on trephine biopsies taken (Ø4 × 4.5 mm) from the experimental group. Less horizontal shrinkage was observed in the ADM group, especially at week 16 considering the group-by-time interaction for the following variables: difference in height between the lingual and buccal alveolar crests (-1.00; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.28 - -1.73), and half-widths, measured as the distance from the long axis of the missing tooth to the buccal alveolar crest at 1 mm (-0.61; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.18 - -1.04) and at 3 mm (-0.56; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.15 - -0.97) below the crest, with mean decreases of 1.07 and 2.14 mm in height difference, 0.66 and 1.32 mm in half-width at 1 mm and 0.43 and 1.02 mm in half-width at 3 mm in ADM and control groups respectively. Densitometry analysis showed higher bone densities in Hounsfield units in the ADM group considering all factors analysed regardless of time point and socket third (coronal, middle, or apical). Histologically, there were no signs of inflammation or foreign body reaction, and dentin particles were surrounded by and in close contact with bone tissue. These results add to the evidence that dentin can be used successfully as a material for alveolar socket preservation, given its desirable mechanical and biological properties, and warrant larger studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The healing process after tooth removal involves bone remodelling which implies some loss of alveolar bone volume. Among materials proposed for minimising this remodelling and preserving the bone, autologous dental tissue is a promising option, but more data are needed. In this context, we evaluated size and density changes using cone beam computed tomography in autologous dental material (ADM)-preserved sockets compared to controls, and assessed biological responses by histological analysis.
METHODS
METHODS
A split-mouth study was conducted including 22 patients, who underwent removal of ≥ 2 single-rooted teeth with intact sockets, assigning one socket to the experimental group which received ADM for alveolar preservation and another to the control group, which only underwent blood clot stabilisation. Cone beam computed tomography was performed postoperatively (week 0) and at weeks 8 and 16 to assess socket size and bone density. Histological analysis was carried out on trephine biopsies taken (Ø4 × 4.5 mm) from the experimental group.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Less horizontal shrinkage was observed in the ADM group, especially at week 16 considering the group-by-time interaction for the following variables: difference in height between the lingual and buccal alveolar crests (-1.00; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.28 - -1.73), and half-widths, measured as the distance from the long axis of the missing tooth to the buccal alveolar crest at 1 mm (-0.61; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.18 - -1.04) and at 3 mm (-0.56; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.15 - -0.97) below the crest, with mean decreases of 1.07 and 2.14 mm in height difference, 0.66 and 1.32 mm in half-width at 1 mm and 0.43 and 1.02 mm in half-width at 3 mm in ADM and control groups respectively. Densitometry analysis showed higher bone densities in Hounsfield units in the ADM group considering all factors analysed regardless of time point and socket third (coronal, middle, or apical). Histologically, there were no signs of inflammation or foreign body reaction, and dentin particles were surrounded by and in close contact with bone tissue.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
These results add to the evidence that dentin can be used successfully as a material for alveolar socket preservation, given its desirable mechanical and biological properties, and warrant larger studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39044178
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04576-0
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04576-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
832Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
pubmed: 15691354
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2003;23:313–23.
Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46 Suppl 21:195–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13057 . Erratum in: J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(1):129. PMID: 30623987.
Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):84–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12170 . PMID: 28000278.
Kalsi AS, Kalsi JS, Bassi S. Alveolar ridge preservation: why, when and how. Br Dent J. 2019;227(4):264–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0647-2 . PMID: 31444438.
Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:779–88.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
pubmed: 21091540
Caiazzo A, Canullo L, Consensus Meeting Group, Pesce P. Consensus Report by the Italian Academy of Osseointegration on the Use of Graft Materials in Postextraction Sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jan-Feb;37(1):98–102. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9290 . PMID: 35235626.
Marconcini S, Denaro M, Cosola S, Gabriele M, Toti P, Mijiritsky E, et al. Myofibroblast gene expression Profile after tooth extraction in the rabbit. Mater (Basel). 2019;12(22):3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12223697 . PMID: 31717520; PMCID: PMC6888118.
doi: 10.3390/ma12223697
Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Prunotto M, Desmoulière A, Varga J, et al. Recent developments in myofibroblast biology: paradigms for connective tissue remodeling. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(4):1340–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.004 . Epub 2012 Mar 2. PMID: 22387320; PMCID: PMC3640252.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.004
pubmed: 22387320
pmcid: 3640252
Nikoloudaki G, Creber K, Hamilton DW. Wound healing and fibrosis: a contrasting role for periostin in skin and the oral mucosa. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318(6):C1065–77. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00035.2020 . Epub 2020 Apr 8. PMID: 32267719; PMCID: PMC7311745.
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00035.2020
pubmed: 32267719
pmcid: 7311745
Menchini-Fabris GB, Toti P, Crespi R, Crespi G, Cosola S, Covani U. A Retrospective Digital Analysis of Contour Changing after tooth extraction with or without using Less Traumatic Surgical procedures. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):922. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040922 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm11040922
pubmed: 35207192
pmcid: 8875248
Crippa R, Aiuto R, Dioguardi M, Nieri M, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M, et al. Immediate dental implant placement in post-extraction-infected sites decontaminated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser: a retrospective cohort study. Odontology. 2023;111(1):255–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00734-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00734-4
pubmed: 36074306
Menchini-Fabris G-B, Cosola S, Toti P, Hwan Hwang M, Crespi R, Covani U. Immediate Implant and customized Healing Abutment for a Periodontally compromised socket: 1-Year Follow-Up retrospective evaluation. J Clin Med. 2023;12:2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082783 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm12082783
pubmed: 37109120
pmcid: 10144425
Minetti E, Celko M, Contessi M, Carini F, Gambardella U, Giacometti E, et al. Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated sites with innovative graft biomaterials: 1 year Follow-Up. Mater (Basel). 2021;14(18):5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185292 .
doi: 10.3390/ma14185292
Bianchi AE, Bassetti A. Flap design for guided tissue regeneration surgery in the esthetic zone: the whale’s tail technique. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2009;29(2):153–9.
Cosola S, Di Dino B, Traini T, Kim YS, Park YM, Marconcini S, et al. Radiographic and histomorphologic evaluation of the Maxillary bone after Crestal Mini Sinus lift using Absorbable collagen-retrospective evaluation. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(4):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040058 .
doi: 10.3390/dj10040058
pubmed: 35448052
Covani U, Giammarinaro E, Panetta D, Salvadori PA, Cosola S, Marconcini S. Alveolar bone remodeling with or without collagen filling of the extraction socket: a high-resolution X-ray Tomography Animal Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092493 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092493
pubmed: 35566619
pmcid: 9100251
Niedzielska I, Ciapiński D, Bąk M, Niedzielski D. The Assessment of the usefulness of platelet-rich fibrin in the Healing process bone resorption. Coatings. 2022;12:247. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12020247 .
doi: 10.3390/coatings12020247
Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:55–66.
pubmed: 8820123
Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2003;23:361–9.
Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2003;23:599–605.
Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjorting-Hansen E, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:237–43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x
pubmed: 16672017
Jensen SS, Bornstein MM, Dard M, Bosshardt DD, Buser D. Comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphates with different HA/TCP ratios in mandibular bone defects. A long-term histomorphometric study in minipigs. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2009;90:171–81.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31271
pubmed: 19085941
Binderman I, Hallel G, Nardy C, Yaffe A, Sapoznikov L. A Novel Procedure to process extracted Teeth for Immediate Grafting of Autogenous Dentin. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci. 2014;2(6):154.
Hussain I, Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, José de Oliveira Neto P, Salata LA. Evaluation of osteoconductive and osteogenic potential of a dentin-based bone substitute using a calvarial defect model. Int J Dent 2012.
Kim Y, Um I, Lee JK, Kim K, Murata M. Healing mechanism and clinical application of autogenous tooth bone graft material. INTECH Open Access; 2013.
Al-Namnam NM, Shanmuhasuntharam P, Ha KO, Siar CH. Processed allogenic dentine as a Scaffold for Bone Healing: an in vivo study. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2010;4(12):5932–40.
Murata M, Um I, Kim K, Mitsugi M, Akazawa T, Kim Y. Human dentin as novel biomaterial for bone regeneration. INTECH Open Access; 2011.
Yeomans JD, Urist MR. (1967) Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12(8):999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7 . PMID: 4226721.
Calvo-Guirado JL, Ballester-Montilla A, De Aza N, Fernández-Domínguez P, Alexandre Gehrke M, Cegarra-Del Pino S. Particulated, extracted human teeth characterization by SEM⁻EDX evaluation as a Biomaterial for Socket Preservation: an in vitro study. Mater (Basel). 2019;12(3):380.
doi: 10.3390/ma12030380
Cervera-Maillo JM, Morales-Schwarz D, Morales-Melendez H, Mahesh L, Calvo-Guirado JL. Autologous tooth dentin graft: a retrospective study in humans. Med (Kaunas). 2021;58(1):56.
Cardaropoli D, Nevins M, Schupbach P. New Bone Formation Using an Extracted Tooth as a Biomaterial: A Case Report with Histologic Evidence. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;39(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4045 . PMID: 30794251.
Canto-Diaz A, Elio-Oliveros J, Canto-Diaz M, Alobera-Gracia MA, Canto-Pingarrón M, Martínez-González JM. Use of autologous tooth-derived graft material in the post-extraction dental socket. Pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):53–60.
Joshi CP, D’Lima CB, Samat UC, Karde PA, Patil AG, Dani NH. Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):211–217. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17 . Erratum in: Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):509. PMID: 28839405; PMCID: PMC5551324.
Singh N, Sonkesriya S, Bagewadi SB, Anwar S, Abraham S, Parihar AS, et al. Clinical Assessment of Bone Quality at Implant Site using CBCT and Hounsfield Unit. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(Suppl 2):S1305–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_109_23 . Epub 2023 Apr 28. PMID: 37693972; PMCID: PMC10485442.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_109_23
pubmed: 37693972
pmcid: 10485442
Yadegari A, Safi Y, Shahbazi S, Yaghoutiazar S, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M. Assessment of CBCT gray value in different regions-of-interest and fields-of-view compared to Hounsfield unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52(8):20230187. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230187 . Epub 2023 Oct 24. PMID: 37874074.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230187
pubmed: 37874074
Pang KM, Um IW, Kim YK, Woo JM, Kim SM, Lee JH. Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):809–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12885 . Epub 2016 Jun 8. PMID: 27279547.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12885
pubmed: 27279547
Couso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G. Post-extraction dimensional changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(1):126–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13390 . Epub 2020 Nov 4. PMID: 33067890.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13390
pubmed: 33067890
Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167 . PMID: 28000281.
40, Feletto L, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Ezzeddin-Ayoub M, Zaragozi-Alonso R, et al. Influence of the use of autogenous bone particles to close the access window after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a micro-computed tomography and positron emission tomography study in rabbits. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;27(2):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01063-0 . Epub 2022 Apr 28. Erratum in: Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;: PMID: 35482147; PMCID: PMC10234857.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01063-0
Cervera-Maillo JM, Morales-Schwarz D, Morales-Melendez H, Mahesh L, Calvo-Guirado JL. Autologous tooth dentin graft: a retrospective study in humans. Med (Kaunas). 2021;58(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010056 . PMID: 35056364; PMCID: PMC8778028.
doi: 10.3390/medicina58010056
Mazor Z, Horowitz RA, Prasad H, Kotsakis GA. Healing Dynamics Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Autologous Tooth Structure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Sep/Oct;39(5):697–702. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4138 . PMID: 31449581.
Tanoue R, Ohta K, Miyazono Y, Iwanaga J, Koba A, Natori T, et al. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the interface between an implanted demineralised dentin matrix and the surrounding newly formed bone. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2858. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21291-3 . PMID: 29434259; PMCID: PMC5809602.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21291-3
pubmed: 29434259
pmcid: 5809602