Optimal approaches for COVID-19 control: the use of vaccines and lockdowns across societal groups.

COVID-19 mathematical modelling non-pharmaceutical interventions optimal control population cohorts vaccination

Journal

Frontiers in epidemiology
ISSN: 2674-1199
Titre abrégé: Front Epidemiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918419158106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 07 10 2023
accepted: 04 06 2024
medline: 24 7 2024
pubmed: 24 7 2024
entrez: 24 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

By March 2023, the COVID-19 illness had caused over 6.8 million deaths globally. Countries restricted disease spread through non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs; e.g. social distancing). More severe "lockdowns" were also required to manage disease spread. Although lockdowns effectively reduce virus transmission, they substantially disrupt economies and individual well-being. Fortunately, the availability of vaccines provides alternative approaches to manage disease spread. Yet, vaccination programs take several months to implement fully, require further time for individuals to develop immunity following inoculation, may not have complete coverage and/or may be imperfectly efficacious against the virus. Given these aspects of a vaccination programme, it is important to understand how NPIs (such as lockdowns) can be used in conjunction with vaccination to achieve public health goals. We use mathematical methods to, investigate optimal approaches for vaccination under varying lockdown lengths and/or severities to prevent COVID-19-related deaths exceeding critical thresholds. We find that increases in vaccination rate cause a disproportionate decrease in the length and severity lockdowns to keep mortality levels below a critical threshold. With vaccination, severe lockdowns can further reduce infections by up to 89%. Notably, we include simple demographics, modelling three groups: vulnerable, front-line workers, and non-vulnerable. We investigate the sequence of vaccination. One counter-intuitive finding is that even though the vulnerable group is high risk, demographically, this is a small group and critically, per person, vaccination therefore occurs more slowly. Hence vaccinating this group first achieves limited gains in overall disease control. Importantly, we conclude that improved disease control may be best achieved by vaccinating the non-vulnerable group coupled with longer and/or more severe NPIs.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
By March 2023, the COVID-19 illness had caused over 6.8 million deaths globally. Countries restricted disease spread through non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs; e.g. social distancing). More severe "lockdowns" were also required to manage disease spread. Although lockdowns effectively reduce virus transmission, they substantially disrupt economies and individual well-being. Fortunately, the availability of vaccines provides alternative approaches to manage disease spread. Yet, vaccination programs take several months to implement fully, require further time for individuals to develop immunity following inoculation, may not have complete coverage and/or may be imperfectly efficacious against the virus. Given these aspects of a vaccination programme, it is important to understand how NPIs (such as lockdowns) can be used in conjunction with vaccination to achieve public health goals.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We use mathematical methods to, investigate optimal approaches for vaccination under varying lockdown lengths and/or severities to prevent COVID-19-related deaths exceeding critical thresholds.
Results UNASSIGNED
We find that increases in vaccination rate cause a disproportionate decrease in the length and severity lockdowns to keep mortality levels below a critical threshold. With vaccination, severe lockdowns can further reduce infections by up to 89%. Notably, we include simple demographics, modelling three groups: vulnerable, front-line workers, and non-vulnerable. We investigate the sequence of vaccination. One counter-intuitive finding is that even though the vulnerable group is high risk, demographically, this is a small group and critically, per person, vaccination therefore occurs more slowly. Hence vaccinating this group first achieves limited gains in overall disease control.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Importantly, we conclude that improved disease control may be best achieved by vaccinating the non-vulnerable group coupled with longer and/or more severe NPIs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39045311
doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1308974
pmc: PMC11263120
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1308974

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Bonsall, Huntingford and Rawson.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Michael B Bonsall (MB)

Mathematical Ecology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Chris Huntingford (C)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.

Thomas Rawson (T)

Mathematical Ecology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH