Can machine learning predict the accuracy of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty, basing on patient-related factors? An explorative investigation on Supervised machine learning classification models.

Artificial intelligence K-Nearest Neighbors Preoperative planning Supervised machine learning Total hip arthroplasty

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 17 01 2024
revised: 10 05 2024
accepted: 23 06 2024
pmc-release: 24 06 2025
medline: 24 7 2024
pubmed: 24 7 2024
entrez: 24 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The success of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is influenced by preoperative planning, with traditional 2D approaches displaying varied reliability as well. The present study investigates the use of Supervised Machine Learning (SML) models with patient-related features to improve accuracy. Preoperative and perioperative data, as well as planning and final implant information, were obtained from 800 consecutive cementless primary THA, which was performed uniformly by a specialized surgical team. Six Supervised Machine Learning models were trained and validated using patient characteristics and implant data: Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (CART), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GN), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). The models' ability to predict planning reliability and leg length disparity was evaluated. KNN performed better on the cup model (97.9 %), femur model (96.7 %), and femur size (99.2 %). SVM emerged as the model with the highest accuracy for cup size (60.4 %) and head size (62.1 %). CART had the best accuracy (99 %) when determining leg length discrepancy. The study demonstrates the utility of Supervised Machine Learning models, specifically KNN, in predicting the accuracy of preoperative planning in THA. The accuracy of these models, which are driven by patient-related characteristics, provides useful information for optimizing patients' selection and improving surgical outcome.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The success of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is influenced by preoperative planning, with traditional 2D approaches displaying varied reliability as well. The present study investigates the use of Supervised Machine Learning (SML) models with patient-related features to improve accuracy.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Preoperative and perioperative data, as well as planning and final implant information, were obtained from 800 consecutive cementless primary THA, which was performed uniformly by a specialized surgical team. Six Supervised Machine Learning models were trained and validated using patient characteristics and implant data: Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (CART), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GN), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). The models' ability to predict planning reliability and leg length disparity was evaluated.
Results UNASSIGNED
KNN performed better on the cup model (97.9 %), femur model (96.7 %), and femur size (99.2 %). SVM emerged as the model with the highest accuracy for cup size (60.4 %) and head size (62.1 %). CART had the best accuracy (99 %) when determining leg length discrepancy.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The study demonstrates the utility of Supervised Machine Learning models, specifically KNN, in predicting the accuracy of preoperative planning in THA. The accuracy of these models, which are driven by patient-related characteristics, provides useful information for optimizing patients' selection and improving surgical outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39045495
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102470
pii: S0976-5662(24)00139-5
pmc: PMC11261062
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102470

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Auteurs

B Zampogna (B)

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
BIOMORF Department, Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Images, Italy.
University of Messina. A.O.U. Policlinico "G.Martino" Messina, Italy.

G Torre (G)

Villa Stuart Sport Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Rome, Italy.
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.

A Zampoli (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

F Parisi (F)

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

A Ferrini (A)

Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

S Shanmugasundaram (S)

Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.

E Franceschetti (E)

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

R Papalia (R)

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH