Open access segmentations of intraoperative brain tumor ultrasound images.
brain tumor
intraoperative ultrasound
segmentations
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jul 2024
24 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
04
04
2024
received:
04
10
2023
accepted:
04
06
2024
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
24
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Registration and segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) images could play an essential role in surgical planning and resectioning brain tumors. However, validating these techniques is challenging due to the scarcity of publicly accessible sources with high-quality ground truth information. To this end, we propose a unique set of segmentations (RESECT-SEG) of cerebral structures from the previously published RESECT dataset to encourage a more rigorous development and assessment of image-processing techniques for neurosurgery. The RESECT database consists of MR and intraoperative US (iUS) images of 23 patients who underwent brain tumor resection surgeries. The proposed RESECT-SEG dataset contains segmentations of tumor tissues, sulci, falx cerebri, and resection cavity of the RESECT iUS images. Two highly experienced neurosurgeons validated the quality of the segmentations. Segmentations are provided in 3D NIFTI format in the OSF open-science platform: https://osf.io/jv8bk. The proposed RESECT-SEG dataset includes segmentations of real-world clinical US brain images that could be used to develop and evaluate segmentation and registration methods. Eventually, this dataset could further improve the quality of image guidance in neurosurgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Organisme : French National Research Agency
ID : ANR-11-LABX-0004 CAMI Labex
Organisme : Multidisciplinary Institute in Artificial Intelligence
ID : ANR-19-P3IA-0003
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro‐Oncology. 2021;23:1231‐1251.
Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:1842‐1850.
Schneider T, Mawrin C, Scherlach C, Skalej M, Firsching R. Gliomas in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:799‐808.
Gerard IJ, Kersten‐Oertel M, Hall JA, Sirhan D, Collins DL. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: an updated review of intra‐operative ultrasound applications. Front Oncol. 2021;10:618837.
Nabavi A, Black PM, Gering DT, et al. Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:787‐798.
Reinertsen I, Collins DL, Drouin S. The essential role of open data and software for the future of ultrasound‐based neuronavigation. Front Oncol. 2021;10:619274.
Bastos DCDA, Juvekar P, Tie Y, et al. Challenges and opportunities of intraoperative 3D ultrasound with neuronavigation in relation to intraoperative MRI. Front Oncol. 2021;11:656519.
Yeole U, Singh V, Mishra A, Shaikh S, Shetty P, Moiyadi A. Navigated intraoperative ultrasonography for brain tumors: a pictorial essay on the technique, its utility, and its benefits in neuro‐oncology. Ultrasonography. 2020;39:394‐406.
Zhang J, Chen X, Zhao Y, Wang F, Li F, Xu B. Impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and functional neuronavigation on surgical outcome in patients with gliomas involving language areas. Neurosurg Rev. 2015;38:319‐330.
Šteňo A, Buvala J, Babková V, Kiss A, Toma D, Lysak A. Current Limitations of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Tumor Surgery. Front Oncol. 2021;11:659048.
Rubin J, Mirfakhraee M, Duda EE, Dohrmann GJ, Brown F. Intraoperative ultrasound examination of the brain. Radiology. 1980;137:831‐832.
Sastry R, Bi WL, Pieper S, et al. Applications of ultrasound in the resection of brain tumors. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27:5‐15.
Carton F‐X, Chabanas M, Le Lann F, Noble JH. Automatic segmentation of brain tumor resections in intraoperative ultrasound images using U‐Net. J Med Imaging. 2020;7:031503.
Namburete AIL, Xie W, Yaqub M, Zisserman A, Noble JA. Fully‐automated alignment of 3D fetal brain ultrasound to a canonical reference space using multi‐task learning. Med Image Anal. 2018;46:1‐14.
Ilunga‐Mbuyamba E, Avina‐Cervantes JG, Lindner D, Arlt F, Ituna‐Yudonago JF, Chalopin C. Patient‐specific model‐based segmentation of brain tumors in 3D intraoperative ultrasound images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13:331‐342.
Canalini L, Klein J, Miller D, Kikinis R. Segmentation‐based registration of ultrasound volumes for glioma resection in image‐guided neurosurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14:1697‐1713.
Canalini L, Klein J, Miller D, Kikinis R. Enhanced registration of ultrasound volumes by segmentation of resection cavity in neurosurgical procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:1963‐1974.
Milletari F, Ahmadi S, Kroll C, et al. Hough‐CNN: deep learning for segmentation of deep brain regions in MRI and ultrasound. CVIU. 2017;164:92‐102. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2017.04.002
Li Z, Kamnitsas K, Glocker B. Overfitting of neural nets under class imbalance: analysis and improvements for segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention, Springer; 2019:402‐410.
Spitzer H, Kiwitz K, Amunts K, Harmeling S, Dickscheid T. Improving cytoarchitectonic segmentation of human brain areas with self‐supervised siamese networks. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention, Springer; 2018:663‐671.
Tajbakhsh N, Jeyaseelan L, Li Q, Chiang JN, Wu Z, Ding X. Embracing imperfect datasets: a review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2020;63:101693.
Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34:1993‐2024.
Mercier L, Del Maestro RF, Petrecca K, Araujo D, Haegelen C, Collins DL. Online database of clinical MR and ultrasound images of brain tumors. Med Phys. 2012;39:3253‐3261.
Xiao Y, Fortin M, Unsgård G, Rivaz H, Reinertsen I. REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors (RESECT): a clinical database of pre‐operative MRI and intra‐operative ultrasound in low‐grade glioma surgeries. Med Phys. 2017;44:3875‐3882.
Juvekar P, Dorent R, Kögl F, et al. ReMIND: the brain resection multimodal imaging database. Sci. Data. 2024;11:494
Munkvold BKR, Bø HK, Jakola AS, et al. Tumor volume assessment in low‐grade gliomas: a comparison of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to coregistered intraoperative 3‐dimensional ultrasound recordings. Neurosurgery. 2018;83:288‐296.
Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Cody Hazlett H, et al. User‐guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1116‐1128.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy‐Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1323‐1341.
Selbekk T, Jakola AS, Solheim O, et al. Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approaches to minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection control. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155:973‐980.
Egger J, Kapur T, Fedorov A, et al. GBM volumetry using the 3D Slicer medical image computing platform. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1364.
Chen C, Wang B, Lu CX, Trigoni N, Markham A. A survey on deep learning for localization and mapping: towards the age of spatial machine intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12567. 2020.