Evaluation of enhanced external counterpulsation for diabetic foot based on a patient-specific 0D-1D cardiovascular system model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Diabetic foot (DF) complications often lead to severe vascular issues. This study investigated the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) and its derived innovative compression strategies in addressing poor perfusion in DF. Although developing non-invasive and efficient treatment methods for DF is critical, the hemodynamic alterations during EECP remain underexplored despite promising outcomes in microcirculation. This research sought to address this gap by developing a patient-specific 0D-1D model based on clinical ultrasound data to identify potentially superior compression strategies that could substantially enhance blood flow in patients with DF complications.

METHODS

Data were gathered from 10 patients with DF utilizing ultrasound for blood flow rate and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to identify lower limb conditions. Clinical measurements during standard EECP, with varying cuff pressures, facilitated the creation of a patient-specific 0D-1D model through a two-step parameter estimation process. The accuracy of this model was verified via comparison with the clinical measurements. Four compression strategies were proposed and rigorously evaluated using this model: EECP-Simp-I (removing hip cuffs), EECP-Simp-II (further removing the cuffs around the lower leg), EECP-Impr-I (removing all cuffs around the affected side), and EECP-Impr-II (building a loop circulation from the healthy side to the affected side).

RESULTS

The predicted results under the rest and standard EECP states were generally closely aligned with clinical measurements. The patient-specific 0D-1D model demonstrated that EECP-Simp-I and EECP-Impr-I contributed similar enhancement to perfusion in the dorsal artery (DA) and were comparable to standard EECP, while EECP-Simp-II had the least effect and EECP-Impr-II displayed the most significant enhancement. Pressure at the aortic root (AO) remained consistent across strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

EECP-Simp-I is recommended for patients with DF, emphasizing device simplification. However, EECP-Simp-II is discouraged as it significantly diminished blood perfusion in this study, except in cases of limb fragility. EECP-Impr-II showed superior enhancement of blood perfusion in DA to all other strategies but required a more complex EECP device. Despite increased AO pressure in all the proposed compression strategies, safety could be guaranteed as the pressue remained within a safe range.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work.