An operator-independent quality assurance system for automatically generated structure sets.

Adaptive proton therapy Adaptive radiotherapy Deformable image registration Structure QA Structure propagation

Journal

Physics in medicine and biology
ISSN: 1361-6560
Titre abrégé: Phys Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 24 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study describes geometry-based and intensity-based tools for quality assurance (QA) of automatically generated structures for online adaptive radiotherapy, and designs an operator-independent traffic light system that identifies erroneous structure sets. 
Approach: A cohort of eight head and neck (HN) patients with daily CBCTs was selected for test development. Radiotherapy contours were propagated from planning CT to daily cone beam CT (CBCT) using deformable image registration (DIR). These propagated structures were visually verified for acceptability. For each CBCT, several error scenarios were used to generate what were judged unacceptable structures. Ten additional HN patients with daily CBCTs and different error scenarios were selected for validation. A suite of tests based on image intensity, intensity gradient, and structure geometry was developed using acceptable and unacceptable HN planning structures. Combinations of one test applied to one structure, referred to as structure-test combinations, were selected for inclusion in the QA system based on their discriminatory power. A traffic light system was used to aggregate the structure-test combinations, and the system was evaluated on all fractions of the ten validation HN patients. 
Results: The QA system distinguished between acceptable and unacceptable fractions with high accuracy, labeling 294/324 acceptable fractions as green or yellow and 19/20 unacceptable fractions as yellow or red. 
Significance: This study demonstrates a system to supplement manual review of radiotherapy planning structures. Automated QA is performed by aggregating results from multiple intensity- and geometry-based tests. &#xD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39047780
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad6742
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Creative Commons Attribution license.

Auteurs

Alexander Bookbinder (A)

Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139-4307, UNITED STATES.

Mislav Bobić (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2696, UNITED STATES.

Gregory C Sharp (GC)

Dept of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom Street, Cox Building, 302, Boston, MA 02114, USA, Boston, 02114, UNITED STATES.

Lena Nenoff (L)

Institut für Radioonkologie - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf e.V. (HZDR), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institut für Radioonkologie - OncoRay, Bautzner Landstr. 400, Dresden, 01328, GERMANY.

Classifications MeSH