Early cardiac mechanics abnormalities in patients with mitochondrial diseases.

BACKGROUND

Evidence about early cardiac mechanics abnormalities in patients with mitochondrial diseases (MDs) before overt cardiomyopathy is limited METHODS: In this prospective study, we performed a comparative analysis of conventional and speckle tracking echocardiographic parameters between patients with genetically identified MDs and no overt cardiomyopathy vs controls matched for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors. The Newcastle mitochondrial disease adult scale (NMDAS) was calculated, using a threshold of > 21 as indicator of high disease severity.

RESULTS

We enrolled 24 MDs patients (50 % males, mean age 47.2 ± 14.3 years), the most prevalent mutation was the MT-TL1 m.3243A.G (37.5 %). In MDs patients all dimensional echocardiographic parameters were similar to controls. Conversely, albeit normal, Tissue Doppler septal systolic (p = 0.002) and early diastolic velocities (p = 0.016) were significantly lower and E/e' ratio was higher (p = 0.032) in MDs. Moreover, LV-GLS was significantly reduced in MDs as compared to their counterparties (20.2 ± 1.6 vs 22.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). Similarly, LA reservoir and conduit strain were significantly lower in MDs (31.7 ± 7.0 vs 35.9 ± 6.6, p = 0.038; 19.7 ± 5.6 vs 23.1 ± 6.0, p = 0.049 respectively), while LA contractile strain was similar between the two groups. Lower values of LV-GLS were observed in patients with NMDAS > 21 vs patients with NMDAS ≤ 21 (19.0 ± 1.2 vs 21.0 ± 1.3, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MDs and no overt cardiomyopathy Tissue Doppler and speckle tracking analysis unveil worse LV systolic and diastolic function indices as compared to controls. Reduced LV-GLS values were found especially in those with worse disease burden.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.