A comparison between IBEX bone health applied to digital radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the distal-third and ultra-distal regions of the radius.
DXA
Forearm
Opportunistic screening
Osteoporosis
T-score
Wrist
aBMD
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jul 2024
24 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
09
11
2023
accepted:
08
07
2024
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
25
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In an ageing population, low impact fragility fractures are becoming increasingly common. However, fracture risk can be reduced where low bone density can be identified at an early stage. In this study we aim to demonstrate that IBEX Bone Health (IBEX BH) can provide a clinically useful prediction from wrist radiographs of aBMD and T-score at the ultra-distal (UD) and distal-third (DT) regions of the radius. A 261-participant single-centre, non-randomised, prospective, study was carried out to compare a) IBEX BH, a quantitative digital radiography software device, to b) Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). A total of 257 participants with wrist digital radiograph (DR), forearm DXA pairs were included in the analysis after exclusions. The adjusted R From a DR of the wrist, IBEX BH provides a clinically useful i) estimate of aBMD at the two regions of interest on the radius and ii) risk prediction model of forearm T-score ≤ - 2.5 at the UD and DT regions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In an ageing population, low impact fragility fractures are becoming increasingly common. However, fracture risk can be reduced where low bone density can be identified at an early stage. In this study we aim to demonstrate that IBEX Bone Health (IBEX BH) can provide a clinically useful prediction from wrist radiographs of aBMD and T-score at the ultra-distal (UD) and distal-third (DT) regions of the radius.
METHODS
METHODS
A 261-participant single-centre, non-randomised, prospective, study was carried out to compare a) IBEX BH, a quantitative digital radiography software device, to b) Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). A total of 257 participants with wrist digital radiograph (DR), forearm DXA pairs were included in the analysis after exclusions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The adjusted R
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
From a DR of the wrist, IBEX BH provides a clinically useful i) estimate of aBMD at the two regions of interest on the radius and ii) risk prediction model of forearm T-score ≤ - 2.5 at the UD and DT regions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39049030
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07670-0
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07670-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
575Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Harvey N, McCloskey EV. Gaps and solutions in bone health: a global framework for improvement. https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/sites/iofbonehealth/files/2019-06/2016GapsAndSolutionsInBoneHealthTREnglish1.pdf . Accessed: 2023-07-10.
Sözen T, Özışık L, Başaran NÇ. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017;4(1):46. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.048 .
doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.048
pubmed: 28293453
Willers C, Norton N, Harvey NC, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, Mccloskey EV, Borgstr¨om F, Kanis JA, review panel of the IOF, S. Osteoporosis in europe: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporosis. 2022;17(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00969-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00969-8
NOGG: Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporo-sis. https://www.nogg.org.uk/full-guideline . 2021. Accessed: 2023–07–01.
FRAX tool. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX . Accessed: 2023–07–10.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet CE, Johansson H, Odén A, Delmas P, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, Kroger H, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024
pubmed: 15268886
Mclellan AR, Wolowacz S, Zimovetz E, Beard S, Lock S, McCrink L, Adekunle F, Roberts D. Fracture liaison services for the evalu-ation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2083.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1534-0
pubmed: 21607809
FLS Data Base annual report 2023. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/fls-db-annual-report-2023 . Accessed: 2023-05-01.
Hanley DA, McClung MR, Davison KS, Dian L, Harris ST, Miller PD, Lewiecki EM, Kendler DL, et al. Western osteoporo-sis alliance clinical practice series: evaluating the balance of benefits and risks of long-term osteoporosis therapies. Am J Med. 2017;130(7):862–18627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.002
Cui L, Jackson M, Wessler Z, Gitlin M, Xia W. Estimating the future clinical and economic benefits of improving osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among women in china: a simulation projection model from 2020 to 2040. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00958-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00958-x
Rinaldi C, Bortoluzzi S, Airoldi C, Leigheb F, Nicolini D, Russotto S, Vanhaecht K, Panella M. The early detection of osteoporosis in a cohort of healthcare workers: is there room for a screening program? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031368 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031368
pubmed: 33540940
pmcid: 7908569
Rangan A, Tuck SP, Scott PD, Kottam L, Jafari M, Watson T, Lopez B, Crone B, Whitbread T, Ratcliffe A. Prospective com-parative study of quantitative x-ray (qxr) versus dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to determine the performance of qxr as a predictor of bone health for adult patients in secondary care. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12): 051021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051021 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051021
Lopez B. A bayes linear approach to making inferences from x-rays. PhD thesis, Durham University; 2018.
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well mea-sures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic frac-tures. BMJ. 1996;312(7041):1254–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254
pubmed: 8634613
pmcid: 2351094
Davidsson L. Dual energy x ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density and body composition assessment. 2010.
Wilson J, Bonner TJ, Head M, Fordham J, Brealey S, Rangan A. Variation in bone mineral density by anatomical site in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):772–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22346 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22346
pubmed: 19483231
Bridge PD, Sawilowsky SS. Increasing physicians’ awareness of the impact of statistics on research outcomes: comparative power of the t-test and wilcoxon rank-sum test in small samples applied research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(3):229–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00168-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00168-1
pubmed: 10210240
Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–35.
pubmed: 24009950
pmcid: 3755824
Bendel RB, Afifi AA. Comparison of stopping rules in forward “step-wise” regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72(357):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1977.10479905 .
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1977.10479905
DiCiccio TJ, Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat Sci. 1996;11(3):189–228. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1032280214 .
doi: 10.1214/ss/1032280214
R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical comput-ing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. https://www.R-project.org/ .
Shepherd JA, Cheng XG, Lu Y, Njeh C, Toschke J, Engelke K, Grigorian M, Genant HK. Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(4):734–45. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.734 .
doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.734
pubmed: 11918231
Nicks KM, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Khosla S. Relationship of age to bone microstructure independent of areal bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(3):637–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1468 .
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1468
pubmed: 22095490
Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, Muñoz del Rio A, Lauder T, Bruce RJ, Summers RM, Pooler BD, Binkley N. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at ct colonography: bone mineral density assessment using mdct attenuation techniques compared with the dxa reference standard. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(9):2194–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.428 .
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.428
pubmed: 21590738
England N, Improvement N. Diagnostic Imaging Dataset Statistical Release. 2022. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/Statistical-Release-21st-July-2022-PDF-875KB.pdf . Accessed: 2023-07-10.
Behrens M, Felser S, Mau-Moeller A, Weippert M, Pollex J, Skripitz R, Herlyn PK, Fischer D-C, Bruhn S, Schober H-C, et al. The bindex® ultrasound device: reliability of cortical bone thick-ness measures and their relationship to regional bone mineral density. Physiol Meas. 2016;37(9): 1528. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/37/9/1528 .
doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/9/1528
pubmed: 27511629
Cortet B, Dennison E, Diez-Perez A, Locquet M, Muratore M, Nogu´es X, Crespo DO, Quarta E, Brandi ML. Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry (rems) for the diagnosis of osteoporo-sis in a european multicenter clinical context. Bone. 2021;143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115786 .
Watts N, Dore R, Baim S, Mitlak B, Hattersley G, Wang Y, Rozental T, LeBoff M. Forearm bone mineral density and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the activextend phase 3 trial. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05555-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05555-1
pubmed: 32935170
Kanis JA, Kanis J. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a who report. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:368–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01622200 .
doi: 10.1007/BF01622200
pubmed: 7696835