Evaluating a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Insert as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammation and Pain Post-Corneal Transplantation.
DMEK
DSEK
Dextenza
PKP
corneal transplantation
Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
27
02
2024
accepted:
10
07
2024
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
25
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the efficiency and safety of an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc) supplemented with a reduced-frequency topical drop regimen in mitigating pain and inflammation post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), compared to standard topical corticosteroid therapy. Eyes were categorized within the DSEK, DMEK, or PKP groups based on ocular characteristics and surgical indications. Randomized in a 1:1 ratio, the intervention group received Dextenza alongside a lowered drop frequency, while the control group followed a conventional drop protocol with no Dextenza. Primary outcomes included average pain scores and absence of anterior chamber cell and flare. Secondary outcomes included delayed re-epithelialization, corneal rejection episodes, instances of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation >10mmHg above baseline, cystoid macular edema (CME) occurrence, and the necessity for steroid rescue. The study included 30 eyes (10 PKP, 10 DSEK, 10 DMEK). Mean pain scores (0-100 scale; (0-39 = mild pain, 40-69 = moderate pain, 70-100 = severe pain) in the Dextenza group were 3.6 (PKP), 12 (DSEK), 8 (DMEK), compared to 1.2 (PKP), 0 (DSEK), and 4 (DMEK) in controls. PKP control (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 IOP elevation, 2 CME. DSEK control (n=5): 1 corneal rejection, 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK control (n=5): 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK Dextenza (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 CME. No cases required steroid rescue, and no cell or flare was observed one-week post-surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in pain, delayed re-epithelialization, IOP elevation, corneal rejection, or CME between the Dextenza and control groups regardless of the type of corneal transplantation performed. Dextenza, when combined with a lower-frequency drop regimen, demonstrates a safety profile comparable to that of a traditional higher-frequency drop protocol in terms of pain management and the adverse events explored in this study, potentially enhancing postoperative drop adherence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39051020
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S466118
pii: 466118
pmc: PMC11268718
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2083-2091Informations de copyright
© 2024 Alsetri et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Eye (Lond). 2020 Mar;34(3):442-450
pubmed: 31332293
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;140(3):509-16
pubmed: 16196117
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):204-212
pubmed: 30367938
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 10;16:4065-4074
pubmed: 36532822
Dermatol Clin. 1992 Jul;10(3):505-12
pubmed: 1617809
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Jun 08;25:e2897
pubmed: 28614429
J Refract Surg. 2021 Sep;37(9):590-594
pubmed: 34506241
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Jul;150(1):7-22
pubmed: 31571625
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1232-6
pubmed: 26983976
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 13;16:2609-2615
pubmed: 35992569
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1857-61
pubmed: 25248295
Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):536-40
pubmed: 22218143