Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aneurysm
angiography
device
flow diverter
intervention
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2024
25 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
25
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (PVED) is a novel coated flow diverter with reduced wire diameters to improve neoendothelialization and stent porosity. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of the PVED based on the current literature. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The random effects model was used to calculate estimates with major neurological complications within 30 days of treatment as the primary safety endpoint and ≤1-year complete occlusion rate as the primary efficacy endpoint. Six single-arm studies (5 retrospective, 1 prospective) with 392 patients and 439 aneurysms (6.8% ruptured) were included. Antiplatelet regimens varied, but dual antiplatelet therapy was administered in the majority. The pooled technical success rate was 99.0% (95%CI, 98.0%-100%) with an average of 1.2 devices implanted per procedure. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 17.0% (95%CI, 6.4-27.6%) and adjunctive coiling in 28.0% (95%CI, 17.8-38.2%), with significant heterogeneity for both variables. Pooled estimates for major neurological complications were 3.5% (95%CI, 1.7%-5.2%) with total ischemic events in 4.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-6.6%) and hemorrhagic events in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-1.9%). The rate of complete angiographic occlusion was 75.7% (95%CI, 70.7%-80.6%) at a mean follow-up of 7 months, with in-stent stenoses in 8.1% (95%CI, 4.5%-11.8%). The safety and efficacy profile of the PVED appears comparable to competing devices, with potentially fewer complications than first-generation flow diverters. Long-term and comparative studies are needed to further confirm these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39051598
doi: 10.1177/15910199241264340
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15910199241264340Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interestSH received travel support by Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). DZ is on the speaker's bureau of Philips (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and lecturer for Amboss GmbH (Cologne, Germany). TL serves or previously served as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), CERUS Endovascular (Fremont, CA, USA), Phenox (Bochum, Germany), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). CK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.