Effects of magnification on restorative dental preparation performance: a scoping review and level of evidence mapping.
Lenses
Magnification
Restorative procedures
Visual acuity
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2024
25 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
05
05
2024
accepted:
22
07
2024
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
25
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This scoping review aimed to identify and describe the available evidence on the effect of magnifying devices (loupe or microscope) on the performance of restorative dental preparations. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews and registered on the INPLASY database. An electronic search was performed in four databases and Grey literature for articles published until November 2023. Eligibility criteria were determined using the PICOS strategy and comprised studies that evaluated the performance of magnification devices for restorative dental preparations. A bibliographic mapping of the evidence was conducted. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies (n = 12) compared the performance of dental preparations using magnification loupes vs. no magnification. The magnification for loupes and microscopes ranged from 2.5x to 4.0x and 6.4x to 10x, respectively. The use of magnifying loupes improved the performance of restorative preparations in 66.6% of the evaluated studies. However, when the magnifications were compared, the greater magnification provided by microscopes did not improve preparation performance compared to magnification loupes. Regarding the place of publication, the American continent concentrates the most significant number of evidence. Although evidence for magnification improving the performance of dental preparations has increased over the last decade, basically only in vitro studies (most of which have taken place in the Americas) have been reported in the literature. The evidence suggests that magnification significantly improves restorative preparation performance when compared to non-magnification. However, higher magnifications (e.g., microscopes) do not appear to improve tooth preparation performance compared with lower magnification devices (e.g., magnification loupes). Available evidence supports that using magnification can improve the performance of restored tooth preparations. However, high magnifications have no advantages over lower magnifications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39052037
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05852-7
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05852-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
447Subventions
Organisme : Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
ID : 200183/23
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, Hardouin JB, Cheraud-Carpentier M, Mbodj EB et al (2022) Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 127:71–79
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017
pubmed: 33143901
Hasanzade M, Aminikhah M, Afrashtehfar KI, Alikhasi M (2021) Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 126:360–368
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.007
pubmed: 32928518
Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B (2015) Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations — a literature review. Clin Oral Invest 19:959–968
doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1439-y
Renne W, McGill ST, Forshee KV, DeFee MR, Mennito AS (2012) Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent 108:310–315
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60183-8
pubmed: 23107239
Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V et al (2013) Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod 39:332–339
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044
pubmed: 23402503
Branson BG, Abnos RM, Simmer-Beck ML, King GW, Siddicky SF (2018) Using motion capture technology to measure the effects of magnification loupes on dental operator posture: a pilot study. Work 59:131–139
doi: 10.3233/WOR-172681
pubmed: 29355132
Plessas A, Bernardes Delgado M (2018) The role of ergonomic saddle seats and magnification loupes in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 16:430–440
doi: 10.1111/idh.12327
pubmed: 29318741
Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2011) Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt 16:35003
doi: 10.1117/1.3555190
Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2013) Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clin Oral Investig 17:725–729
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0753-x
pubmed: 22638771
Urlic I, Pavan J, Verzak Z, Karlovic Z, Negovetic Vranic D (2021) The best Dentistry Professional Visual Acuity measured under simulated clinical conditions provides Keplerian Magnification Loupe: a cross-sectional study. Dent J (Basel) 11:69
doi: 10.3390/dj9060069
Atlas AM, Janyavula S, Elsabee R, Alper E, Isleem WF, Bergler M et al (2022) Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: a microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.008
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.008
pubmed: 35643825
Eggmann F, Irani DR, Fehlbaum PA, Neuhaus KW (2022) Do magnification loupes affect the precision of cavity preparations made by undergraduates? A randomized crossover study. BMC Oral Health 22:189
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02232-z
pubmed: 35590298
pmcid: 9118579
Pecheva A, Tsanova S, Raycheva R (2020) In vitro evaluation of the impact of optical magnification on the preparation for veneers. J IMAB 26:3155–3159
doi: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3155
Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB (2015) Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 13:141–146
doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
pubmed: 26134548
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 169:467–473
doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
pubmed: 30178033
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) (2017) Critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies (non-randomized experimental studies). https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Forgie AH, Pine CM, Longbottom C, Pitts NB (1999) The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland–a survey report. J Dent 27:497–502
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00030-5
pubmed: 10507205
Leknius C, Geissberger M (1995) The effect of magnification on the performance of fixed prosthodontic procedures. J Calif Dent Assoc 23:66–70
pubmed: 9052031
Forgie AH, Pine CM, Pitts NB (2001) Restoration removal with and without the aid of magnification. J Oral Rehabil 28:309–313
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00680.x
pubmed: 11350582
Lussi A, Kronenberg O, Megert B (2003) The effect of magnification on the iatrogenic damage to adjacent tooth surfaces during class II preparation. J Dent 31:291–296
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00029-0
pubmed: 12735924
Ayar M, Güvenç P, Wajngarten D (2022) Effect of the use of dental loupe on cavity size after removal of the aged composite resin restorations. Selcuk Dent J 9:423–427
doi: 10.15311/selcukdentj.953659
Narula K, Kundabala M, Shetty N, Shenoy R (2015) Evaluation of tooth preparations for class II cavities using magnification loupes among dental interns and final year BDS students in preclinical laboratory. J Conserv Dent 18:284–287
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.159724
pubmed: 26180411
pmcid: 4502122
Braga T, Robb N, Love RM, Amaral RR, Rodrigues VP, de Camargo JMP et al (2021) The impact of the use of magnifying dental loupes on the performance of undergraduate dental students undertaking simulated dental procedures. J Dent Educ 85:418–426
doi: 10.1002/jdd.12437
pubmed: 32984960
Pazos JM, Wajngarten D, Dovigo LN, Garcia PPNS (2020) Implementing magnification during pre-clinical training: effects on procedure quality and working posture. Eur J Dent Educ 24:425–432
doi: 10.1111/eje.12517
pubmed: 32080964
Wajngarten D, Pazos JM, Menegazzo VP, Novo JPD, Garcia PPNS (2021) Magnification effect on fine motor skills of dental students. PLoS ONE 16:e0259768
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259768
pubmed: 34748614
pmcid: 8575251
Wajngarten D, Pazos JM, Garcia PPNS (2021) The effects of Magnification and Operator’s experience on the quality of Preclinical Dental procedures. JAMMR 33:16–23
doi: 10.9734/jammr/2021/v33i2231155
Wajngarten D, Botta AC, Garcia PPNS (2021) Magnification loupes in dentistry: a qualitative study of dental students’ perspectives. Eur J Dent Educ 25:305–309
doi: 10.1111/eje.12605
pubmed: 32976674
Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB (2011) The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence Int 42:45–55
pubmed: 21206933
Eichenberger M, Biner N, Amato M, Lussi A, Perrin P (2018) Effect of magnification on the precision of tooth preparation in dentistry. Oper Dent 43:501–507
doi: 10.2341/17-169-C
pubmed: 29513642
Ge YJ, Liu XQ (2019) Effects of loupes and microscope on laminate veneer preparation. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 51:100–104
pubmed: 30773552
Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S (2010) Endodontic therapy using magnification devices: a systematic review. J Dent 38:269–275
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.008
pubmed: 20117164
Removal of fiber (2018) Posts during endodontic retreatments using ultrasonic tips: a comparison between two different endodontic fiber posts. G Ital Endod 32:47–50
doi: 10.1016/j.gien.2018.04.002
Schubert O, Erdelt KJ, Tittenhofer R, Hajtó J, Bergmann A, Güth JF (2020) Influence of intraoral scanning on the quality of preparations for all-ceramic single crowns. Clin Oral Investig 24:4511–4518
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03316-2
pubmed: 32436159
pmcid: 7666666