Fluoroscopy-only guided transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure: the importance of pre-procedural echocardiography.

PFO closure device closure fluoroscopy patent foramen ovale (PFO) percutaneous vlosure of PFO transesophageal echocardiography

Journal

The Journal of invasive cardiology
ISSN: 1557-2501
Titre abrégé: J Invasive Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8917477

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 07 2024
Historique:
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 25 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) to prevent recurrent paradoxical thromboembolic events has become the standard of care. However, it remains uncertain if transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) guidance improves procedural success with an existing comprehensive pre-procedural TOE. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous PFO closure guided by fluoroscopy (FS) only vs TOE plus FS. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure between February 2017 and April 2023 were analyzed. Based on pre-procedural echocardiography, patients were scheduled either for an FS-only or TOE/FS-guided procedure. The primary-endpoint was effective PFO-closure (residual-shunt grade 0/1 at 6-month follow-up). The secondary-endpoints included procedural safety/efficacy and major adverse cardiovascular events during hospital stay and at the 6-month follow-up. Two hundred-three patients (mean age 51.8 ± 12.5 years, 39.4% women, Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score = 7 [IQR = 6-7]) underwent PFO closure with FS-only guidance (88 patients, 43.3%) or TOE/FS guidance (115 patients, 56.7%). The main indications for PFO closure were cryptogenic stroke (179 patients, 88.2%) and peripheral embolism (13 patients, 6.4%). At baseline, a right-to-left shunt of grade 2 or higher was present in 199 patients (98%). The procedure time in the FS group was shorter (13 minutes in the FS group vs 16.5 minutes in the TOE/FS group, P = .002). The immediate procedural success was 99.5%. At 6 months, effective closure was achieved in 195 patients (96.1% [FS group: 97.7% vs TOE/FS group 97.8%, P = .29]). The rates of atrial fibrillation and recurrent thromboembolic events were not different among the procedural strategies (3.9% [P = .47] and 0.5% [P = .43]). After comprehensive pre-procedural echocardiography workup, PFO closure with FS guidance only seems equally safe and effective as TOE/FS guidance. A standardized pre-procedural echocardiography protocol facilitates procedural planning with excellent echocardiographic and clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39052516
doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00111
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Mathias Wolfrum (M)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Federico Moccetti (F)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Nina Conrad (N)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Lucca Loretz (L)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Mehdi Madanchi (M)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Matthias Bossard (M)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Adrian Attiger-Toller (A)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Florim Cuculi (F)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Simon F Stämpfli (SF)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Stefan Toggweiler (S)

Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH