Safety and effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies after switching from natalizumab.

One strategy to mitigate progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk is to switch to other highly effective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). However, the optimal switch DMT following natalizumab (NTZ) discontinuation is yet to be determined. The objective of the study is to determine the most effective and tolerable DMTs to switch to following NTZ discontinuation due to John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibody positivity. This is a multicenter observational cohort study that included all stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who were treated with NTZ for at least 6 months before switching therapy due to JCV antibody positivity. Of 321 patients, 255 switched from NTZ to rituximab/ocrelizumab, 52 to fingolimod, and 14 to alemtuzumab, with higher annualized relapse rate (ARR) in fingolimod switchers (0.193) compared with rituximab/ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab (0.028 and 0.032, respectively). Fingolimod switchers also had increased disability progression ( Our study shows superior effectiveness of rituximab/ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab compared with fingolimod in stable patients switching from NTZ due to JC virus antibody positivity.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M.Z. has received honoraria for lectures from Biologix, Biogen, Janssen, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Merck, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. She received travel grants from Novartis, Merck, and Roche and a research grant from Biogen. She received two research grants from Biogen, one research grant from Merck, and two research grants from MENACTRIMS. She has no conflict of interest related to this study. B.Y. has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; research grants from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer; and advisory board honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. He has no conflict of interest related to this study. A.A.-A. has received honoraria from Novartis, Sanofi, Biologix, Merck, Roche, Biogen, and Bayer. He serves on the scientific advisory boards of Novartis, Merck, and Roche. He has no conflict of interest related to this study. R.G. has received research grant from Roche and advisory board honoraria from Biogen, Hikma, Merck, Roche, and Sanofi. He has no conflict of interest related to this study. S.M. received a MENACTRIMS clinical research grant (2020) but has no conflict of interest related to this study. R.A.-R., S.F.A., S.K., N.E.-A., A.A.-M., J.A.-K., A.C., J.I., N.S., J.M., F.M.R.H.M., A.A.-H., P.S., H.D., and F.B. declare that there is no conflict of interest.